Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T10:50:34.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks on Kähler-Einstein Manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Yozo Matsushima
Yozo Matsushima*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Notre Dame,
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The main purpose of this note is to characterize a compact Káhler-Einstein manifold in terms of curvature form. The curvature form Q is an EndT valued differential form of type (1,1) which represents the curvature class of the manifold. We shall prove that the curvature form of a Káhler metric is the harmonic representative of the curvature class if and only if the Káhler metric is an Einstein metric in the generalized sense (g.s.), that is, if the Ricci form of the metric is parallel. It is well known that a Káhler metric is an Einstein metric in the g. s. if and only if it is locally product (globally, if the manifold is simply connected and complete) of Kàhler-Einstein metrics. We obtain an integral formula, involving the integral of the trace of some operators defined by the curvature tensor, which measures the deviation of a Káhler-Einstein metric from a Hermitian symmetric metric. In the final section we shall prove the uniqueness up to equivalence of Kãhler-Einstein metrics in a simply connected compact complex homogeneous space. This result was proved by Berger in the case of a complex projective space and our proof is completely different from Berger’s.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 46 , March 1972 , pp. 161 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1972

References

[1] Atiyah, M.F., Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (1957), 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Apte, M., Sur certaines classes caractéristiques des variétés kaehleriennes compactes, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 240 (1955), 149–151.Google Scholar
[3] Berger, M., Sur les variétés d’Einstein compactes, C.R. IIP Reunion Math. Expression latine, Namur (1965), 35–55.Google Scholar
[4] Borei, A. and Remmert, R., Über kompakte homogène Kählersche Mannigfaltigkeiten, Math. Ann. 145 (1962), 429–439.Google Scholar
[5] Calabi, E., and Vesentini, E., On compact, locally symmetric Kaehler manifolds, Ann. of Math. 71 (1960), 472–507.Google Scholar
[6] Kobayashi, S. and Nomizu, K., Foundations of differential geometry, II, Interscience Publishers, 1969.Google Scholar
[7] Goldberg, S.L. and Kobayashi, S., On holomorphic bisectional curvature, J. Diff. Geom. 1 (1967), 225–233.Google Scholar
[8] Koszul, J. L., Sur la forme hermitienne cononique des espaces homogènes complexes, Canad. J. Math. 7 (1955), 562–576.Google Scholar
[9] Nomizu, K., On the spaces of generalized curvature tensor fields and second fundamental forms, to appear.Google Scholar
[10] Matsushima, Y., Sur la structure du groupe d’homéomorphismes analytiques d’une certaine variété kaehlerienne, Nagoya Math. J. 11 (1957), 145–150.Google Scholar
[11] Vitter, A. L., Affine Structures on compact complex manifolds, Thesis, Princeton Univ. (1970).Google Scholar