Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:50:56.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two remarks on polynomially bounded reducts of the restricted analytic field with exponentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2016

Serge Randriambololona*
Affiliation:
Galatasaray Ünivertisesi, Matematik Bölümü, Örtaköy/Istanbul, Turkey, serge.randriambololona@ens-lyon.org, serge.randriambololona@math.cnrs.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article presents two constructions motivated by a conjecture of van den Dries and Miller concerning the restricted analytic field with exponentiation. The first construction provides an example of two o-minimal expansions of a real closed field that possess the same field of germs at infinity of one-variable functions and yet define different global one-variable functions. The second construction gives an example of a family of infinitely many distinct maximal polynomially bounded reducts (all this in the sense of definability) of the restricted analytic field with exponentiation.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2014

References

[1] Gabrielov, A., Complements of subanalytic sets and existential formulas for analytic functions, Invent. Math. 125 (1996), 112. MR 1389958. DOI 10.1007/s002220050066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Karpinski, M. and Macintyre, A., A generalization of Wilkie’s theorem of the complement, and an application to Pfaffian closure, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 5 (1999), 507516. MR 1740680. DOI 10.1007/s000290050055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Kuhlmann, F.-V. and Kuhlmann, S., Valuation theory of exponential Hardy fields, I, Math. Z. 243 (2003), 671688. MR 1974578. DOI 10.1007/s00209–002-0460–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Gal, O. Le, A generic condition implying o-minimality for restricted C-functions, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 19 (2010), 479492. MR 2790804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Miller, C., Expansions of the real field with power functions, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 68 (1994), 7994. MR 1278550. DOI 10.1016/0168-0072(94)90048–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Miller, C., Exponentiation is hard to avoid, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1994), 257259. MR 1195484. DOI 10.2307/2160869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Nesin, A. and Pillay, A., Some model theory of compact Lie groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 326 (1991), no. 1, 453463. MR 1002922. DOI 10.2307/2001873.Google Scholar
[8] Poizat, B., A Course in Model Theory: An Introduction to Contemporary Mathematical Logic, Springer, New York, 2000. MR 1757487. DOI 10.1007/978–1-4419–8622-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Randriambololona, S., o-Minimal structures: Low arity versus generation, Illinois J. Math. 49 (2005), 547558. MR 2164352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Soufflet, R., Asymptotic expansions of logarithmic-exponential functions, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 33 (2002), 125146. MR 1934286. DOI 10.1007/s005740200005.Google Scholar
[11] van den Dries, L., Dense pairs of o-minimal structures, Fund. Math. 157 (1998), 6178. MR 1623615.Google Scholar
[12] van den Dries, L., Tame Topology and o-Minimal Structures, London Math. Soc. LectureNote Ser. 248, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. MR 1633348. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511525919.Google Scholar
[13] van den Dries, L., Macintyre, A., and Marker, D., The elementary theory of restricted analytic fields with exponentiation, Ann. of Math. (2) 140 (1994), 183205. MR 1289495. DOI 10.2307/2118545.Google Scholar
[14] van den Dries, L. and Miller, C., On the real exponential field with restricted analytic functions, Israel J. Math. 85 (1994), 1956. MR 1264338. DOI 10.1007/BF02758635.Google Scholar
[15] van den Dries, L. and Miller, C., Geometric categories and o-minimal structures, Duke Math. J. 84 (1996), 497540. MR 1404337. DOI 10.1215/S0012–7094-96–08416-1.Google Scholar