Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:16:15.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confidence Intervals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Extract

The National Institute has a long history of analysing its forecasting record; recent Reviews have contained accounts of the accuracy of our forecasts of inflation (February 1984) and GDP (Savage 1983). Earlier studies include Brooks and Cuthbertson (1981) and Osborn and Teal (1979). Such studies ask two fundamental questions: how good have our forecasts been in the past, and how much confidence can we hold for our forecasts for the future? In the case of the first question the above-mentioned studies provide an almost complete answer. The second question can only be answered by such studies on the assumption that our past record will be maintained in the future. This note approaches the second question from an entirely different viewpoint. An estimate of confidence bands for the National Institute's Model 7 will be derived by the use of stochastic simulations of the model. Just as the earlier studies offer only a partial guide to the accuracy of our forecasting ability in the future, so this note is also only a partial answer to the question. This is because our forecasts do not consist simply of a mechanical model run; instead the basic model forecast is supplemented by much other information. A good example of this is the recent miners' strike which could not have been included in the forecast on the basis of a purely mechanical model forecast. We would therefore expect the model to have a larger error bound than our final published forecasts. The scope of this note, it must be stressed, is strictly only applicable to the model we use to forecast and not to the finally published forecasts.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This note was prepared by S. G. Hall.

References

Brooks, S. and Cuthbertson, K. (1981), ‘Econometric models and economic forecasts’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 41 (summarised in National Institute Economic Review, no. 95, February).Google Scholar
Chow, G. and Corsi, P. (1982) (eds), Evaluating the reliabiliy of macro-economic models, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Fisher, P. and Salmon, M. (1984), ‘On valuating the importance of nonlinearity in large macroeconomic models’, ESRC Macroeconomic Modelling Bureau Discussion Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
Hall, S.G. (1984), ‘The application of stochastic simulation techniques to the National Institute's Model 7’, National Institute Discussion Paperno. 65.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.D. (1972), ‘Some notes on the generation of pseudo-structural errors for use in stochastic simulation studies’ in Hickman, B. G. (ed), Econometric Models in Cyclical Behaviour, National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth, no. 36, New York.Google Scholar
Osbom, D.R. and Teal, F. (1979), ‘An assessment of two econometric model forecasts’, National Institute Economic Review, no.89, August.Google Scholar
Salmon, M. and Wallis, K.F. (1982), ‘Model validation and forecasting comparisons: theoretical and practical considerations’. Chapter 12 of Evaluating the reliability of macro-economic models, op. cit.Google Scholar
Savage, D. (1983), ‘The assessment of the National Institute's forecasts of GDP, 1959-1982’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 105, August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar