Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:27:04.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domesday Economy: Analysis of the English Economy Early in the Second Millennium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

John McDonald
John McDonald*
Affiliation:
Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia
*
e-mail: john.mcdonald@flinders.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Domesday Survey of 1086 provides high quality and detailed information on the outputs, inputs and tax assessments of most English manors. These data can be used to reconstruct the eleventh century Domesday economy. This article describes the Survey, the contemporary institutional arrangements, and the main features of Domesday agricultural production. It shows how frontier methods can be used to assess the efficiency of production and the impact of the feudal and manorial systems on input productivities and production output. The frontier analysis suggests that the average efficiency level of Domesday estates relative to the best practice of the time was similar to, or more favourable than, that of production units in more modern primary industry. Also, input rigidities induced by feudalism and manorialism resulted in widely differing input productivities across estates, and a very significant reduction in overall output.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 172 , April 2000 , pp. 105 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

I would like to thank Eva Aker for excellent research assistance, Knox Lovell and Jonathan Pincus for their support throughout the project, S. Snap for her caring assistance, and the Australian Research Grants Council and Flinders University for financial support. Any errors are my responsibility.

References

Afriat, S. (1972), ‘Efficiency estimation of production functions’, International Economic Review, 13, pp. 568–98.Google Scholar
Aston, T.H. (ed.) (1987), Landlords, Peasants and Politics in Medieval England Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ballard, A. (1906), The Domesday Inquest, London, Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittnell, R.H. and Campbell, M.S. (eds) (1995), A Commercialising Economy: England 1086 to c. 1300 Manchester, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R.A. (1984), The Normans, Woodbridge, Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Byrnes, P., Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Lovell, C.A.K. (1988), ‘The effect of unions on productivity: US surface mining of coal’, Management Science, 34, pp. 1037–53.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M.T. (1983), England and its Rulers, 1066-12 72, Glasgow, Fontana.Google Scholar
Darby, H.C. (1952), The Domesday Geography of Eastern England, reprinted 1971, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (1977), Domesday England, reprinted 1979, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darby, H.C. and Maxwell, I.S. (eds) (1962), The Domesday Geography of Northern England, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1951), ‘The coefficient of resource utilization’, Review of Economic Studies, 9, pp. 300–12.Google Scholar
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Lovell, C.A.K. (1983), ‘The structure of technical efficiency’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 85, pp. 181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J. (1957), ‘The measurement of productive efficiency’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120, pp. 253–81.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J. and Fieldhouse, M. (1962), ‘Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 125, 2, pp. 252–67.Google Scholar
Galbraith, V.H. (1961), The Making of Domesday Book, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grosskopf, S. (1986), ‘The role of the reference technology in measuring productive efficiency’, The Economic Journal, 96, pp. 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.R. (1975), ‘The efficiency of post-bellum southern agriculture’ Ann Arbor, Michigan, University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Hall, B.F. and LeVeen, E.P. (1978), ‘Farm size and economic efficiency : the case of California’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, pp. 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, H.E. (1981), Rural England 1066-1348, Brighton, Fontana. (ed.) (1988), The Agrarian History of England and Wales, II: 1042-1350, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, S.P.J.(1983), ‘The extent and profitability of demesne agriculture in England in the latter eleventh century’, in Aston, T.H. et al. (eds), Social Relations and Ideas: Essays in Honour of R.H. Hilton, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollister, C.W. (1965), The Military Organisation of Norman England, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Holt, J.C. (ed.) (1987), Domesday Studies, VVoodbridge, Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. (1977), ‘Examples of production relations based on microdata’, in Harcourt, G.C. (ed.), The Microfoundations of Macroeconomicss, Vol. 6, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdon, J. (1982), ‘The economics of horses and oxen in medieval England’, Agricultural History Review, 30, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
Lennard, R. (1959), Rural England 1086-1135: A study of Social and Agrarian Conditions, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Loyn, R. (1962), Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, reprinted 1981, London, Longman.Google Scholar
(1965), The Norman Conquest, reprinted 1981, London, Longman.Google Scholar
(1983), The Governance of Anglo-Saxon England, 500-1087, London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. (1997), ‘Manorial efficiency in Domesday England’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, pp. 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Production Efficiency in Domesday England, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. and Snooks, G.D. (1985a), ‘Were the tax assessments of Domesday England artificial? The case of Essex’, Economic History Review, 38, pp. 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985b), ‘The determinants of manorial income in Domesday England: evidence from Essex’, Journal of Economic History 45, pp. 541–56.Google Scholar
(1985c), ‘Statistical analysis of Domesday Book (1086)’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 148, pp. 147–60.Google Scholar
(1986), Domesday Economy: A New Approach to Anglo-Norman History, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1987a), ‘The suitability of Domesday Book for cliometric analysis’, Economic History Review, 40, pp. 252–61.Google Scholar
(1987b), ‘The economics of Domesday England’, in Williams, A. (ed.), Domesday Book Studies, London, Alecto Historical Editions.Google Scholar
Maitland, F.W. (1897), Domesday Book and Beyond, reprinted 1921, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, E., and Hatcher, J. (1978), Medieval England: Rural Society and Economic Change 1086-1348, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Morris, J. (gen. ed.) (1975), Domesday Book: A Survey of the Counties of England, Chichester, Phillimore.Google Scholar
Postan, M.M. (ed.) (1966), Medieval Agrarian Society in its Prime, The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. I, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1972), The Medieval Economy and Society: An Economic History of Britain in the Middle Ages, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Raftis, J.A. (1957), The Estates of Ramsey Abbey: A Study in Economic Growth and Organisation, Toronto, Pontificial Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Round, J.H. (1895), Feudal England: Historical Studies on the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries, reprinted 1964, London, Allen & Unwin. (1903), ‘Essex survey’, in VCH Essex, I, reprinted 1977, London, Dawson.Google Scholar
Shephard, R.W. (1970), The Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1974), Indirect Production Functions, Mathematical Systems in Economics, 10, Meisenheim Am Glad, Verlag Anton Hein.Google Scholar
Snooks, G.D. (1995), ‘The dynamic role of the market in the Anglo-Saxon economy and beyond, 1086-1300’, in Brittnell, R.H. and Campbell, M.S. (eds), A Commercialising Economy: England 1086 to c 1300, Manchester, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Stenton, D.M. (1951), English Society in the Middle Ages, reprinted 1983, Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Stenton, F.M. (1943), Anglo-Saxon England, reprinted 1975, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Victoria County History (1900-), London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (ed.) (1987), Domesday Book Studies, London, Alecto Historical Editions.Google Scholar