No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Financing the United Nations
International Taxation Based on Capacity to Pay
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 March 2020
Abstract
The United Nations is financed by an international tax on its member states which is supposed to be based on capacity to pay. The most practical measure of this capacity is Gross National Product in the most recent year for which data are available, converted to US dollars at market exchange rates. Several alternative tax bases have been proposed but most have theoretical or practical drawbacks. Although the UN's effective tax rate is very low, a case can be made for additional relief for poor countries; the appropriate extent of this is primarily a matter of political choice. The present method of calculation of contributions does not however provide a good measure of current capacity to pay, largely because a succession of ad hoc adjustments over the years have given excessive weight to out-of-date economic data.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1996 National Institute of Economic and Social Research
References
Beckerman, W. and Bacon, R. (1967), ‘International comparisons of income levels: a suggested new measure’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXVI,September, pp.519–536.Google Scholar
Gulde, A.M. and Schulze-Ghattas, M. (1993), ‘Purchasing Power Parity based weights for the World Economic Outlook’ in Staff Studies for the World Economic Outlook, IMF, Washington, December 1993.Google Scholar
IMF, World Bank, OECD and EBRD (1991), ‘A study of the Soviet economy vol.1’, OECD, Paris, February.Google Scholar
Hannay, D.H.A. (1996), ‘Paying for the UN. A case for emergency treatment ‘The World Today, June 1996.Google Scholar
Kay, J.A. and King, M.A. (1983), The British Tax System, third edition: Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marris, R.L. (1984), ‘Comparing the incomes of nations: a critique of the international comparisons project’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXII, March 1984, pp.40–57.Google Scholar
Odi (1996), ‘New sources of finance for development’, Overseas Development Insitute Briefing Paper, London, February 1996.Google Scholar
Renniger, J.P., Donaghue, D., Geib, P., Perez, H., Sevenaer, W. van N. (1982), ‘Assessing the United Nations scale of assessments’, Policy and Efficiency Studies, no.9, UNITP, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Sefton, J.A. and Weale, M.R. (1996a), ‘Real national income’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 155, February, pp. 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton, J.A. and Weale, M.R. (1996b), ‘The net national product and exhaustible resources: the effects of foreign trade’, Journal of Public Economics (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1991), ‘The Penn World Table (Mark 5),’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CVI, May 1991, pp. 327–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN(1946), Report of the Report of the Preparatory Commission of the United Nations),United Nations: New York.Google Scholar
UN(1992), Handbook of the International Comparison Programme,Studies in Methods series F no.62, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
UN (1995a), Report of the Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Working Group on the Implementation of the Principle of Capacity to Pay (A/49/897), United Nations, New York: 8 May 1995.Google Scholar
UN(1995b), ‘Report of the Committee on contributions 1995’, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fiftieth Session, Supplement no.11, (A/50/11),United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
UN (1995c), Working Group on the UN Financial Situation, (WGFS/19-19A), July.Google Scholar