Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:47:47.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Measurement of Employment and Unemployment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

David Metcalf
David Metcalf*
Affiliation:
Centre for Labour Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In May 1984 unemployment was, officially, 3.1 million. Critics of the count put the true figure at between 1.7 million and 4.4 million, depending on their point of view. In Section 1 I examine what the statistics do and do not measure and highlight recent changes in coverage and counting. Estimates of the long-run rate of unemployment are given in Section 2. These estimates imply that injudicious macroeconomic policy accounts for a large fraction of current unemployment. In Section 3 Britain's unemployment is put into an OECD context. It is shown that our comparatively high level of unemployment is not due to problems with the labour supply or lack of adaptability on the part of the workforce. Finally, Section 4 addresses the question ‘where are the new jobs coming from?’ There is general agreement that manufacturing will not be a source of net new jobs, but private services are unlikely to generate jobs on the scale required to make a dent in unemployment.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 109 , August 1984 , pp. 59 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brittan, S. (1984), ‘Sustaining the unsustainable: a comment’, in Layard et al., pp. 53–60.Google Scholar
Cambridge Economic Policy Group, (1982), Review, 82(2).Google Scholar
Chancellor of the Exchequer, (1983) ‘Changing employment patterns: where will the new jobs be?’, NEDC (83)58, November.Google Scholar
Dilnot, A. and Morris, C. (1983), ‘Private costs and benefits of unemployment: measuring replacement rates’, Oxford Economic Papers, 35(4), pp. 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, C., Layard, R. and Oswald, A., editorial, (1983), The Causes of Unemployment, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Grubb, D., (1984), ‘Calculations of the NAIRU’, London School of Economics, Centre for Labour Economics, mimeo, 30.05.84.Google Scholar
Institute for Employment Research, (1983), Review of the Economy and Employment, Summer, Warwick University.Google Scholar
Layard, R. and Nickell, S. (1984), ‘The determination of unemployment’, London School of Economics, Centre for Labour Economics, Working Paper No. 609, February.Google Scholar
Layard, R., Basevi, G., Blanchard, O., Buiter, W. and Dornbusch, R. (1984), Europe: the case for unsustainable growth, Centre for European Policy Studies, Papers 8/9, May.Google Scholar
Lipsey, D. (1983), ‘Why you can't count the jobless’, Sunday Times, 6/11/83.Google Scholar
Martin, J. and Roberts, C. (1984), ‘Women's employment in the 1980s’, DE Gazette, May, pp. 189–209.Google Scholar
Minford, P. (1983), ‘Labour market equilibrium in an open economy’, Oxford Economic Papers, 35(4), pp. 531–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute, (1983), ‘Unemployment’, Economic Review, November, pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
Nickell, S. (1982), ‘The determinants of equilibrium unemployment in Britain’, Economic Journal, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oecd, (1984), Employment Outlook, September.Google Scholar
Robertson, J., Briggs, J. and Goodchild, A. (1982), Structure and employment prospects of the service industries, Research Paper 30, Department of Employment, July.Google Scholar
Sumner, M. and Ward, R. (1983), ‘The reappearing Phillips curve’, Oxford Economic Papers, 35(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trade Union Congress, (1983), ‘Where are the new jobs coming from?’ NEDC (83)59, November.Google Scholar