Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:34:31.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Total Factor Productivity Growth and the Role of Externalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Nicholas Oulton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that the greater part of economic growth can be accounted for by the accumulation of human and physical capital. The role of externalities is relatively small. This view is defended by reviewing the most sophisticated growth accounting studies and also by presenting some new evidence on the growth of total factor productivity in 53 countries over the period 1965 to 1990.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 162 , October 1997 , pp. 99 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K.J. (1962), ‘The economic implications of learning by doing’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 80, pp. 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A.J., Hassett, K.A., and Oliner, S.D. (1994), ‘Reassessing the social returns to equipment investment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CIX (August), pp. 789–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank of England (1995), Inflation Report: November 1995, Bank of England: London.Google Scholar
Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Barro, R. and Lee, J.-W. (1993), ‘International comparisons of education attainment’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 32, pp. 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A.B. and Durlauf, S.N. (1996), ‘Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 71 (March/April), pp. 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomström, M., Lipsey, R.E., and Zejan, M. (1996), ‘Is fixed investment the key to economic growth?’ Quarterly Journal o f Economics, vol. CXI (February), pp. 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boskin Commission [Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index] (1996), Towards a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living, final report to the Committee on Finance of the US Senate.Google Scholar
Caballero, R.J. and Lyons, R.K. (1992), ‘External effects in US procyclical productivity’, Journal o f Monetary Economics, vol. 29, pp. 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S.M. and Bosworth, B.P., (1996), ‘Economic growth in East Asia: accumulation versus assimilation’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2, pp. 135–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (1992), ‘Productivity growth reconsidered’, Economic Policy, vol. 15 (October), pp. 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. (1996), “Post neo-classical growth theory': what are its policy implications?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12 (2), pp. 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, J.B. and Summers, L. (1991), ‘Equipment investment and economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CVI (May), pp. 445–502.Google Scholar
DeLong, J.B. and Summers, L. (1992), ‘Equipment investment and economic growth: how strong is the nexus?’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2, pp.157–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, J.B. and Summers, L. (1994), ‘Equipment investment and economic growth: reply’, Quarterly Journal o f Economics, vol. CIX (August), pp. 803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, E.F. (1967), Why Growth Rates Differ, Washington DC, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Domar, E.D. (1961), ‘On the measurement of technological change’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXI, pp. 709–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englander, A.S. and Gurney, A. (1994), ‘Medium term determinants of OECD productivity’, OECD Economic Studies, no. 22, (Spring), pp. 49–109.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R.C. (1991), ‘New product varieties and the measurement of international prices’, American Economic Review, vol. LXXXIV (March), pp.157–177.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.J. (1990), The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1992), ‘The search for R&D spillovers’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 94 (3), Supplement, pp. 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1994), ‘Productivity and the data constraint’, American Economic Review, vol. 84 (March), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1994), ‘Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth’, Journal o f Economic Perspectives, vol. 8 (Winter), pp. 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1940), ‘The valuation of the social income’, Economica, vol. VII, pp. 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B.H. (1996), ‘The private and social returns to research and development’, in Smith, B. and Barfield, C. (eds), Technology, R &D and the Economy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Islam, N. (1995), ‘Growth empirics: a panel data approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CX (November), pp. 1127–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C.I. (1995), ‘R & D-based models of economic growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 103, pp. 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1966), ‘The embodiment hypothesis’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 74, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1990), ‘Productivity and economic growth’, in Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: the Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, edited by Berndt, E.R. and Triplett., J.E.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., EM Gollop, and Fraumeni, B.M. (1987), Productivity and US Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. and Griliches, Z. (1967), ‘The explanation of productivity change’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 34, pp. 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E. (1988), ‘On the mechanics of economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, pp. 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E. (1993), ‘Making a miracle’, Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (1996) ‘Macroeconomic accounts for European countries’, in Crafts, N. and Ark, B. van (eds), Quantitative Aspects of Post-War European Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayes, D.G. and Young, G. (1993), ‘Industrial investment and economic policy’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 56.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (1993), ‘Widening the human stomach: the effect of new consumer goods on economic growth and leisure’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 45, pp. 364–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. (1995a), ‘Depreciation, obsolescence and the role of capital in growth accounting’, Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 47, pp. 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. (1995b), ‘Supply side reform and UK economic growth: what happened to the miracle?’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 154 (November), pp. 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. (1996), ‘Increasing returns and externalities in UK manufacturing: myth or reality?’, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. XLIV (March), pp. 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. and O'Mahony, M. (1994), Productivity and Growth: A Study of British Industry, 1954-1986, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. and Young, G. (1996), ‘How high is the social rate of return to investment?’, Oxford Review o f Economic Policy, vol. 12 (2), pp. 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pack, H. (1994), ‘Endogenous growth theory: intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8 (Winter), pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. (1994), ‘Returns to investment in education: a global update’, World Development, vol. 22(9), pp. 1325–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quah, D. (1996), ‘Twin peaks: growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics’, Economic Journal, vol. 106 (July), pp. 1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1987a), ‘Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1987, vol. 1, pp. 163–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1987b), ‘Growth based on increasing returns due to specialisation’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 77, pp. 56–62.Google Scholar
Romer, P.M. (1994), ‘The origins of endogenous growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8 (Winter), pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P.M. (1990), ‘Endogenous technical change’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98 (October), pp. S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996), ‘The classical approach to convergence analysis’, Economic Journal, vol. 106 (July), pp. 1019–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.Fg. (1989), A New View of Economic Growth, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M.J. and Wilcox, D.W. (1996), ‘Mismeasurement in the consumer price index: an evaluation’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1996, pp. 93–142. Cambridge, MA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1957), ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39, pp. 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1994), ‘Perspectives on growth theory’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8 (Winter),pp. 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, B.W. (1986), Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H. (1996), ‘Measuring the quality of educational outputs: a note’, LSE Centre for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper no. 302.Google Scholar
Summers, R., and Heston, A. (1991), ‘The Penn World Table (Mark 5): an expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-88’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CVI, pp. 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. (1995),‘The tyranny of numbers: confronting the realities of the East Asian growth experience’, Quarterly Journal o f Economics, vol. CX (August), pp. 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar