Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T02:48:58.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uncertainty, Forecasting and Budget Changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Extract

Notes in this Review and in the August number assess the forecasts made by the Institute since 1959 for output and prices. In this note we use data assembled for that purpose in a quite different context. Our purpose here is to consider how discretionary changes in fiscal policy may increase or decrease forecast uncertainty.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(1)

This note was prepared by A.J.C. Button.

References

note 1 in page 60 It is assumed that forecasters within the policy-making govern ment departments do not have access to much useful information which is not available to outside forecasters such as those at the Institute.

note 2 in page 60 That rule will be most helpful if it refers to the movement of direct policy instruments such as tax rates, not to intermediate targets such as the PSBR or the money supply.

note 1 in page 61 The standard error is rather larger in the equation using revised data for the CPI and the suggestion of upward bias a little more pronounced.

note 2 in page 61 The idea derives from Brainard, W. C., ‘Uncertainty and the effectiveness of policy’, American Economic Review, May 1967. One needs to distinguish, however, between the case where the effect of policy is constant but not known with precision and the case where the effect of policy is believed to vary over time. Our discussion in this note is concerned only with the former.

note 1 in page 62 These regressions are not therefore to be interpreted as a serious attempt to estimate ‘reaction functions’. In the present context we are interested in regressing P only on such variables as appear in equation (1) (or might appear in a generalisation of it).

note 2 in page 62 An additional arguement leading to a broadly similar conclusion would be in line with the familiar ‘Lucas critique’ of modelbuilding. If a policy rule is changed then the way private agents form expectations will change and, in consequence, the behaviour of the economy will then change (to an unknown ex tent). Such changes in behaviour can only increase the uncertainty of all forecasts.