Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:42:18.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The External Implications of Closer European Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

David G. Mayes
David G. Mayes*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The happy outcome which is looked for in closer economic integration in the world is that all countries gain. This is particularly clear for a general removal of trade barriers, such as those indicated for the whole range of products by Stoeckel et al. (1990) or for individual products, such as the ending of the Multifibre Arrangement explored by Trela and Whalley (1990). Here those who have been protecting their industries gain because the losses to producers are more than offset by the gains to consumers, those who have been discriminated against in the past gain because they can increase their exports and those foreign countries which were previously benefiting from privileged access to the protected markets gain because their loss of market share is more than offset by an expansion in the market.

Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 134 , November 1990 , pp. 73 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The pages which follow contain five short articles on the ways in which countries outside the European Community are affected by the rapid pace of closer integration generated by the ideas embodied in the White Paper on ‘Completing the Internal Market’ in 1985 and set to continue well into the 1990s with Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and widening to include EFTA and East European countries. These papers were commissioned for a conference on ‘The External Impact of Closer External Integration’, held at the National Institute on 13th September, 1990 and have been revised for publication in the light of the discussion.

The process of effects from integration is evolutionary as the articles explain. Countries threatened by what they see as adverse consequences try to get the offending facets of European integration changed by diplomatic pressure and other lobbying. Firms in those countries also try to alter their pattern of trade, investment and production to optimise their position, rationalising their operations within the Community to evade barriers, reduce costs and benefit as much as they can from the internal market.

Some countries such as EFTA and developing countries which were formerly colonies of the member states have special preferences with the EC. However, these articles deal with the countries round the Pacific Rim, which include the world's most important trading nation, the US, the major competitive threat, Japan, the world's fastest growing economies, among them the members of ASEAN, and the developed countries which suffered most from UK membership of the EC; Australia and New Zealand. The articles by Woolcock, Yannopoulos, Pelkmans and Mayes deal with these four sets of countries in turn but the discussion begins with a further article by Mayes which introduces the forces at work in economic integration in Europe and provides the context for the four regional assessments.

References

Baldwin, R. (1989), ‘The growth effects of 1992’, Economic Policy, October, pp. 248–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. (1990), ‘On the microeconomics of the European monetary union’, in European Economy, ‘The Economics of EMU’, special issue.Google Scholar
Burridge, M. et al. (1990) ‘Oxford Economics Forecasting's System of Models’, Economic Modelling (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Burridge, M. and Mayes, D. (1990) ‘Industrial change for 1992’ ch.10 in Structural Change and the UK Economy, C. Driver and P. Dunne, eds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Catinat, M., Donnie, E. and Italianer, A. (1988) ‘Macroeconomic consequences of the completion of the internal market: the modelling evidence’, chapter 10 in Studies on the Economics of Integration, vol. 2. Research on the Cost of Non-Europe, EC Commission; Brussels/ Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Cecchini, P. (1988) 1992: The European Challenge, Aldershot; Wildwood House.Google Scholar
CEPS (1989) 1992: The Environment for European Industry, Report of a Working Party, Brussels.Google Scholar
Delors, J. (1989) Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community, EC.Google Scholar
Ernst & Young, Niesr and Aume (1990) A Strategy for the ECU, Kogan Page.Google Scholar
European Commission (1990) ‘Economic and Monetary Union’, Sec (90) 1659 final, Brussels (October)Google Scholar
Mayes, D.G. (1971), ‘The effect of alternative trade groupings on the UK’, PhD dissertation, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Stoeckel, A., Pearce, D and Banks, G. (1990) Western Trade Blocs, Centre for International Economics, Canberra.Google Scholar
Trela, I. and Whalley, J. (1990) ‘Global effects of developed country trade restrictions on textiles and apparel’, Economic Journal, December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD (1989) Trade and Development Report 1989, Washington: UN.Google Scholar
Yannopoulos, G.N. (1990) The External Implications of the Completion of the Internal Market of the Community, Report of a Working Party, CEPS, Brussels.Google Scholar