Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:29:28.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Good Quality Childcare for All? Progress Towards Universal Provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Ivana La Valle*
Affiliation:
National Centre for Social Research
Ruth Smith
Affiliation:
National Centre for Social Research

Abstract

In 1998 childcare was for the first time put on the political map with the publication of the Green Paper ‘Meeting the Childcare Challenge’ (DfEE, 1998), setting out the first National Childcare Strategy. Since then the childcare landscape has changed beyond recognition with a range of initiatives and considerable funding aimed at improving childcare services. A decade after its introduction, this article considers what the childcare strategy has achieved in relation to early years and what remains to be done to meet its key aim, that is: to provide good quality childcare for all parents who need it and all children who can benefit from it.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belski, J., Barnes, J. and Melhuish, E. (eds) (2007), The National Evaluation of Sure Start- Does Area-based Early Intervention Work?, Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, C., Kazimirski, A. and Southwood, H. (2006), Childcare and Early Years Provision: A Study of Parents' Use, Views and Experiences, Research Report RR723, London, DfES.Google Scholar
Butt, S., Goddard, K., La Valle, I. and Hill, M. (2007), Childcare Nation? Progress on the childcare strategy and priorities for the future, London, Daycare Trust.Google Scholar
Connolly, S. and Gregory, M. (2008), ‘Moving down: women's part-time work and occupational change in Britain 1991-2001’, The Economic Journal, 118 (February), pp. 5276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2007), The Children's Plan: Building Brighter Future, Norwich, DCSF Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) (1998), Meeting the Childcare Challenge: A Framework and Consultation Document, London, The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2006), ‘Funding for the free entitlement for 3 and 4 year olds’, Letter from the Children's Minister to Local Authority Chief Executives and Directors of Children's Services, 7 December 2006, www.dfes.gov.uk/localauthorities/_documents/.Google Scholar
Dickens, S., Taylor, J. and La Valle, I. (2005), Local Childcare Markets: A Longitudinal Study, SSU Research Report 016, London, DfES.Google Scholar
Glass, N. (1999), ‘Sure Start: the development of an early intervention programme for children in the UK’, Children & Society, 13, 4, pp. 257–64.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. and Connolly, S. (2008), ‘Feature: the price of reconciliation: part-time work, families and women's satisfaction’, The Economic Journal, 118 (February), pp. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, T., La Valle, I. and Dickens, S. (2004), Childcare:How Local Markets Respond to National Initiatives, SS Research Report 016, London, DfES.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2004), Choice for Parents, the Best Start for Children: a Ten Year Strategy for Childcare, London, The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Kazimirski, A., Smith, R., Butt, S., Ireland, E. and Lloyd, E. (2008), Childcare and Early Years Provision: A Study of Parents' Use, Views and Experiences, Research Report 25, Norwich, DCSF Publications.Google Scholar
La Valle, I., Smith, R., Purdon, S., Bell, A., Dearden, L., Shaw, J. and Sibieta, L. (2007), National Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Nursery Initiative: Impact Report, Research Report SSU/2007/020, London: DfES.Google Scholar
La Valle, I., Clery, E. and Huerta, M.C. (2008), Maternity Rights and Mothers' Employment Decisions, Research Report No. 496, Norwich, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. (2008), ‘The interface between childcare, family support and child poverty strategies under New Labour: tensions and contradictions’, Social Policy & Society, 7, 4, pp. 479–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, A. and Petrolongo, B. (2008), ‘The part-time pay penalty for women in Britain’, The Economic Journal, 118 (February), pp. 2851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, S. and Sylva, K. (2007), National Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Nurseries Initiative: The Relationship between Quality and Children's Behavioural Development, Research Report SSU/ 2007/FR/0222, Norwich, DCSF Publications.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006), Starting Strong II. Early Childhood and Care, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Pugh, G. (2006), ‘The policy agenda for early childhood services’, in Pugh, G. and Duffy, B. (eds), Contemporary Issues in the Early Years, 4th ed, London, SAGE Publications, pp. 719.Google Scholar
Scott, J., Dex, S. and Joshi, H. (eds) (2008), Women and Employment. Changing Lives and New Challenges, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Smith, R., Speight, S. and La Valle, I. (forthcoming), Fitting It All Together: How Families Arrange their Childcare and the Influence on Home Learning, Norwich, DCSF Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Coxon, C. and Sigala, M. (2007), National Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Nurseries Initiative: Implementation Study, SSU Research Report 021, London, DfES.Google Scholar
Strategy Unit (2002), Inter-Departmental Childcare Review: Delivering for Children and Families, London, Strategy Unit.Google Scholar
Sylva, K. et al. (1999), ‘Characteristics of the pre-school environments’, EPPE Technical Paper 6A, London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar