Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T18:26:35.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The implications of the Boskin Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Nicholas Oulton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Boskin Commission has claimed that the US Consumer Price Index (CPI) is currently overestimating the true rate of inflation by 1.1 percentage points per annum. This article assesses the evidence for this conclusion and its implications for the measurement of past and future US economic performance. If Boskin is right, US GDP growth in the period 1970 to 1996 has been underestimated by about 0.9 per cent per annum. Some at least of the methodological changes recommended by Boskin will probably be adopted. As a result US GDP growth will appear to rise, eventually by as much as 0.5 per cent per annum, even though no genuine improvement in economic performance has actually occurred. Boskin has implications for the UK too. Recent evidence suggests that use of a formula recommended by Boskin for averaging price quotes together can by itself reduce UK inflation by 0.4 per cent per annum.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 165 , July 1998 , pp. 89 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index [The Boskin Commission] (1996), Towards a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living, Final Report to the Committee on Finance of the US Senate.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. (1997), ‘Implications of the US Boskin Report for the UK retail prices index’, Economic Trends, no. 527 (October), pp. 56–62.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (1997), Measurement Issues in the Consumer Price Index, June, [Downloadable from BLS web site].Google Scholar
Carruthers, A.G., Sellwood, D.J. and Ward, P.W. (1980), ‘Recent developments in the Retail Prices Index’, The Statistician, 29, pp. 1–32.10.2307/2987492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A.W.F. (1996), ‘Measurement bias in price indices: an application to the UK's RPI’, Bank of England Working Paper no. 47.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980), Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, E. (1976), ‘Exact and superlative index numbers’, Journal of Econometrics, 4 (2), pp. 115–145.10.1016/0304-4076(76)90009-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, E. (1987), ‘Index numbers’, In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2, edited by Eatwell, J., Millgate, M. and Newman, P., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Diewert, E. (1995), ‘Axiomatic and economic approaches to elementary price indexes’, NBER Working Paper no. 5104, Cambridge, MA.10.3386/w5104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R.J. (1990), The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226304601.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R.J. (1997), Comment on Moulton and Moser, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, pp. 350–357.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1940), ‘The valuation of the social income’, Economica, VII, pp. 105–124.10.2307/2548691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, J.A. (1996), ‘Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition’, in Bresnahan, T.F. and Gordon, R.J. (Eds), The Economics of New Goods, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hulten, C. (1997), ‘Quality change in the CPI’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 79 (no. 3, May/June), pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Moulton, B.R. (1996), ‘Bias in the Consumer Price Index: what is the evidence?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (Fall), pp. 159–178.10.1257/jep.10.4.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, B.R. and Moser, K.E. (1997), ‘Addressing the quality change issue in the Consumer Price Index’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, pp. 305–366.10.2307/2534705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. (1992), ‘Measuring public-sector output: the Swedish Report’, in Griliches, Z., Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oulton, N. (1995), ‘Do UK price indexes overstate inflation?’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 152 (May), pp. 60–75.10.1177/002795019515200105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oulton, N. and Smithers, A. (1997), The Overstatement of Inflation : True but Misunderstood, London: Smithers and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M.D. and Wilcox, D.W. (1996), ‘Mismeasurement in the Consumer Price Index: an evaluation’, NBER Macroeconomics Amaual 1996, pp. 93–142, Cambridge, MA: SAGE Publications.10.3386/w5590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, M. (1995), ‘Elementary aggregates, micro-indices and scanner data: some issues in the compilation of Consumer Price Indices’, Review of Income and Wealth, 41 (December), pp. 427–438.10.1111/j.1475-4991.1995.tb00136.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett, J. (1997), ‘Measuring consumption: the post-1973 slowdown and the research issues’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 79 (no. 3, May/June), pp. 9–42.Google Scholar
Turvey, R. et al. (1989), Consumer Price Indices: An ILO Manual, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor (1992), BLS Handbook of Methods, Bulletin 2414, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Wynne, M.A. and Sigalla, ED (1994), ‘The Consumer Price Index’, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Review, Second Quarter, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar