Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T03:19:39.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reducing Inequalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Executive summary

A backlash against numerous inequalities – and in particular against perceived unfairness in society – is a significant driver of the UK's current political malaise. Addressing inequalities between income groups, regions and generations will thus be key to re-establishing faith in government and avoiding further decline or even the threat of social unrest.

In income terms, the UK has become much more unequal than in the immediate post-war decades, and it should be a goal to reverse that trend – targeting the OECD average for income inequality and a halving of the number of those living below the poverty line. Measures to deal with perceived unfairnesses could include tighter scrutiny of competition in high-yielding sectors such as technology, and incentives for the appointment of worker representatives to company boards. But a government intent on tackling inequalities will inescapably need to raise public spending and direct taxation of income and capital from their current historically low levels. In particular spending on education and active labour market policies needs to increase, while gaps in the benefits system and regional imbalances are addressed.

Given the scale of technological change and the severe implications for the labour market, the risk is that policy will be insufficiently bold to deal with widespread disenchantment, which could ultimately pose a threat to democracy.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper has benefited from significant and substantive comments from Angus Deaton (Princeton University). Disclaimer: The views, judgements and policy proposals expressed in this chapter are those of the authors, but not necessarily those of the critical commentator, Gatehouse Advisory Partners, Llewellyn Consulting, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

References

Blanchflower, D. (2019), ‘Not Working. Where have all the good jobs gone?’, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Bunn, P., Pugh, A. and Yeates, C. (2018), ‘How does monetary policy affect the distribution of income and wealth?’, Bank Underground blog, 27 March.Google Scholar
Francise, M. and Prady, D. (2018), ‘Universal basic income: debate and impact assessment’, IMF Working paper WP/18/273, December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar