Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:36:05.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The UK Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Ray Barrell  and
Rebecca Riley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

GDP growth picked up in the second quarter and has remained close to trend over the course of the summer after an initial dip in the first quarter of the year. Preliminary estimates of GDP suggest the economy expanded by 0.6 per cent in the third quarter of 2003. The recovery of growth from the relative weakness observed throughout most of 2001 and 2002 has arrived somewhat earlier than we thought at the time of our July forecast. GDP growth was revised upwards from 0.1 and 0.3 per cent per quarter in the first two quarters of the year to 0.2 and 0.6 per cent per quarter. Chart 1 shows our forecast of quarterly GDP growth to the end of 2004. We expect growth to remain close to trend over this period. For this year as a whole our central projection shows the economy expanding by 2.0 per cent this year and by 2.6 and 2.7 per cent per annum in 2004 and 2005.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 186 , October 2003 , pp. 35 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrell, R. and Hurst, I. (2003), ‘Benchmarks and targets under the SGP: evaluating safe deficit targets and automatic stabilisers using NiGEM’, National Institute Economic Review, 184, July.Google Scholar
National Institute Economic Review (2003), 183, pp. 41–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuke, A. and Beadle, J. (2003), ‘The effect of annual chain-linking on Blue Book 2002 annual growth estimates, Economic Trends, 593, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar