Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:23:14.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pedagogy and Politics: Origins of the Special Conference of 1905 on Primary Education for Non-Russians in the East

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Wayne Dowler
Wayne Dowler*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In May-June 1905 a special conference on education for non-Russians (inorodtsy) of the eastern Empire met in St Petersburg. The conference was organized by the Ministry of National Enlightenment (i.e. Education) with the concurrence of the Holy Synod. It was chaired by A. S. Budilovich, a member of the Council of Ministers. The conference had been preceded by an investigatory commission, also headed by Budilovich, which visited non-Russian elementary schools in the eastern regions of Russia and interviewed education officials, teachers, and parents involved in the education of non-Russians in the area. The purpose of the commission and the subsequent conference was the “examination of the presently existing legislation concerning the non-Russian schools of eastern Russia and in particular that system among them which is linked to the name of N.I. Il'minskii, compared with the schools of the general type that exist in those regions, on the one hand, and with the confessional schools (especially Moslem and Buddhist), on the other.”

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 761 - 775
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Budilovich, A. S., ed., Trudy osobago soveshchaniia po voprosam obrazovaniia vostochnykh inorodtsev (St Petersburg, 1905), p. iii.Google Scholar

2. Smirnov, V. Z, Reforma nachal'noi i srednei shkoly v 60-kh godakh XIX veka (Moscow, 1954), p. 159.Google Scholar

3. Pobedonostsev, K. P., “Iz chernovykh bumag K.P. Pobedonostseva,” Krasnyi arkhiv, Vol. 3, No. 18, pp. 205–207.Google Scholar

4. The best study in English of the Il'minskii method and its history in Russian education is Kreindler, Isabelle, “Educational Policies Toward the Eastern Nationalities in Tsarist Russia: A Study of Il'minskii's System,” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York, 1969. Il'minskii explained his method in a number of publications: Il'minskii, N. I., Kazanskaia tsentral'naia kreshcheno-tatarskaia shkola. Materialy dlia istorii khristianskago prosveshcheniia kreshchenykh tatar (Kazan', 1887); ibid., Sistema narodnago i v chastnosti inorodcheskago obrazovaniia v Kazanskom krae (St Petersburg, 1886). A useful early work in Russian is Rozhdestvin, A., Nikolai Il'minskii i ego sistema inorodcheskago obrazovaniia v Kazanskom krae (Kazan', 1900).Google Scholar

5. “Postanovleniia soveta Ministerstva Narodnago Prosveshcheniia. Zasedanie 2-go fevralia 1870 goda. Zhurnal no. 42,” Zhurnal Ministerstva Narodnago Prosveshcheniia, Vol. 148, No. 1, 1870, pp. 55–58.Google Scholar

6. Il'minskii, N. I., Programma shkoly dlia kreshchennykh inorodtsev vostochnoi Rossii (Kazan', 1893).Google Scholar

7. Russkii Gosudarstvennyi Istoricheskii Arkhiv (RGIA, St. Petersburg), Fond 733 (Ministry of National Enlightenment), Opis’ 173, Delo 101, 1. 37.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., ll. 44–45.Google Scholar

9. In Kazan’ province in 1898 apart from Brotherhood Schools and Church parish schools, there were 18 schools that reported directly to the Ministry of National Enlightenment and 178 schools under the local School Councils for Christian non-Russians. The inspector reported that in all of them the Il'minskii system as stipulated in the 1870 Regulation was being used. Tsentral'nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Respubliki Tatarstana (TsGART), fond 92 (Kazan’ School District), opis’ 1, delo 24874, ll. 15–16.Google Scholar

10. See, for example, his admiring comments about Il'minskii and his work in his letters to Aleksandr III. Pobedonostsev, K. P., Pis'ma K.P. Pobedonostsev k Aleksandru III , Vol. III (St Petersburg, undated), pp. 79–81, 259–260. For Il'minskii's extensive correspondence with Pobedonostsev see N. I. Il'minskii, Pis'ma N.I. Il'minskago k ober-prokuratoru sviateishago sinoda Konstantinu Petrovichu Pobedonostsevu (Kazan', 1895).Google Scholar

11. TsGART, f. 92, op. 2, d. 3798, l. 5.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., ll. 1–11.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., l. 6.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., l. 5.Google Scholar

15. Idem.Google Scholar

16. Idem.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., ll. 14–26.Google Scholar

18. Ibid., l. 25.Google Scholar

19. Ibid., l. 18.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., l. 22.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., ll. 27–40.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., l. 37.Google Scholar

23. Ibid., l. 39.Google Scholar

24. RGIA, f. 733, op. 173, d. 101, ll. 45–46.Google Scholar

25. Ibid., ll. 90–91.Google Scholar

26. Ibid., l. 69.Google Scholar

27. Ibid., l. 49. Emphasis in original.Google Scholar

28. Ibid., ll. 110–112.Google Scholar

29. Budilovich, A. S., ed., Trudy osobago soveshcheniia po voprosam obrazovaniia vostochnykh inorodtsev (St Petersburg, 1905).Google Scholar

30. Ibid., p. ix.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., p. xi.Google Scholar

32. Ibid., p. vii.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., pp. xli, xviii.Google Scholar

34. Ibid., pp. viii-ix.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., pp. xxxvi-xxxviii.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., pp. vii, lii-liii.Google Scholar

37. RGIA St Petersburg, f. 733, op. 170, d. 263, ll. 666–670.Google Scholar

38. For a discussion of the fate of the Il'minskii system after 1906 see Gorokhov, B. M., Reaktsionnaia shkol'naia politika tsarizma v otnoshenii tatar povolzh'e (Kazan', 1941), pp. 85–100.Google Scholar

39. Budilovich, , Trudy, p. liii.Google Scholar