Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:21:46.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accommodating National Diversity Within States: Territorial and Non-Territorial Approaches Since the Late 19th Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Börries Kuzmany ,
Matthias Battis  and
Oskar Mulej Open the ORCID record for Oskar Mulej [Opens in a new window]
Börries Kuzmany
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of East European History, Austria
Matthias Battis
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of East European History, Austria
Oskar Mulej*
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of East European History, Austria
*
Corresponding author: Oskar Mulej, email: oskar.mulej@univie.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

ethnic diversity accommodationminoritiesnon-territorial autonomyCentral and Eastern Europeterritoriality
Type
Introduction
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 50 , Issue 5: Special Issue on Accommodating National Diversity Within States , September 2022 , pp. 850 - 856
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, John. 1994. “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Otto. (1907) 2000. “The Concept of the Nation.” Chap. 1, Section 10 in The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy, edited by Minmi, Ephraim J., translated by O’Donnell, Josef, 99–119. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Breuer, Stefan. 2004. “Von der sozialen Staatslehre zur Staatssoziologie: Georg Jellinek und Max Weber.” In Die normative Kraft des Faktischen: Staatsverständnis Georg Jellineks, edited by Andreas Anter, 89–112. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, John. 2016. “Conclusion: Patterns of Non-territorial Autonomy.” Ethnopolitics 15 (1): 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danzer, Carl M. 1908. Das neue Österreich: Eine politische Rundfrage veranstaltet von Carl M. Danzer. Wien: C. Konegen.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2013. The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouques-Duparc, Jacques. 1922. La Protection des Minorités, de Race, de Langue et de Religion: Étude de Droit des Gens. Paris: Librairie Dalloz.Google Scholar
Forman, Michael. 1998. Nationalism and the International Labor Movement: The Idea of the Nation in Socialist and Anarchist Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg. 1905. Das Recht des modernen Staates: Erster Band. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: O. Häring.Google Scholar
Kersten, Jens. 2000. Georg Jellinek und die klassische Staatslehre. Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts, 28. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Lukas, Josef. 1908. “Territorialitäts- und Personalitätsprinzip im österreichischen Nationalitätenrecht.” Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 2: 333–405.Google Scholar
Raffestin, Claude. (1980) 2019. Pour une Géographie du Pouvoir. Edited by Anne-Laure Amilhat Szary and Yann Calbérac. Lyon: ENS Éditions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, Karl [Rudolf Springer]. 1902. Kampf der Oesterreichischen Nationen um den Staat. Erster Theil: Das nationale Problem als Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsfrage. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
Renner, Karl. 1918. Das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Nationen: in besonderer Anwendung auf Oesterreich. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
Sack, Robert D. 1983. “Human Territoriality: A Theory.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73 (1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David. 2020. “Introduction to the Special Issue on National Cultural Autonomy in Diverse Political Communities: Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives.” Nationalities Papers 48 (2): 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David. 2014. “Minority Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy in Europe: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Challenges.” In Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges, edited by Kántor, Zoltán, 15–24. L’Harmattan: Budapest.Google Scholar
Springer, Rudolf [Karl Renner]. 1902. Kampf der Oesterreichischen Nationen um den Staat. Erster Theil: Das nationale Problem als Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsfrage. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
Suki, Markku. 2015. “Non-Territorial Autonomy: The meaning of ‘(Non-) Territoriality’.” In Minority accommodation through territorial and non-territorial autonomy, edited by Malloy, Tove H. and Palermo, Francesco, 83–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. (1921) 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Edited by Winckelmann, Johannes, 5th ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar