Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:14:55.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The paradox of Solidarity's legacy: contested values in Poland's transitional politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jack Bielasiak*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA

Abstract

Poland's post-communist development is often depicted as a contrast between a unified, engaged society of pre-1989 and a passive, divisive society of post-1989. What explains the displacement of political solidarity with a fragmented political scene? A factor specific to Poland is rooted in the struggle of Solidarity against communist power. The consequences are subsequent attempts to appropriate the values of Solidarność as political capital by competing political voices, leading to contestation about the nature of the country. This normative discourse was evident first in the post-communist divide, between forces stemming from the former communist regime and those affiliated with the opposition. More recently, the saliency of the post-communist division has receded, and a new contested discourse has surfaced among voices coming out of the Solidarity tradition. This rhetoric seeks to define a contrast between a “Solidaristic Poland” dedicated to traditional and Christian values affirming notions of exclusivity and superiority, and a “liberal Poland” dedicated to market and pluralist principles based on competition and individualism. In both political divides, the legacy of Solidarity provides useful political capital to advance distinctive visions of Poland.

Type
Special Section: Legitimacy and the Legacy of 1989
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamski, Wladyslaw, and Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. “Dynamika postaw kontestacyjnych.” Polacy ‘88: Dynamika honflihtu a szanse reform. Ed. Adamski, Wladyslaw et al, Warsaw: CPBP, 1989: 223–67. Print.Google Scholar
Baltowski, Maciej, and Miszewski, Maciej. Transformacja gospodarcza w Polsce. Warsaw: PWN, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael H. The Origins of Democratization in Poland: Workers, Intellectuals, and Oppositional Politics 1976–1980. New York: Columbia UP, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Beyer, Gerald J.A Theoretical Appreciation of the Ethic of Solidarity in Poland Twenty-Five Years After.” Journal of Religious Ethics 35.2 (2007): 207–32. Print.Google Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. “Party Systems and EU Accession: Euroskepticism in East Europe.” Public Opinion, Party Competition, and the European Union in Post-Communist Europe, Ed. Rohrschneider, Robert and Whitefield, Stephen, New York: Palgrave, 43–64. Print.Google Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. “Substance and Process in the Development of Party Systems in East Central Europe.” Communist and Post-communist Studies 30.1 (1997): 2428. Print.Google Scholar
Brier, Robert. “The Roots of the ‘Fourth Republic': Solidarity's Cultural Legacy to Polish Politics.” East European Politics and Societies 23.1 (2009): 6385. Print.Google Scholar
Cenckiewicz, Slawomir, and Gontarczyk, Piotr. SB a Lech Walesa: Przyczynek do biografi. Warsaw: Instytut Pamièci Narodowej, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Czesnik, Mikolaj. “Partycypacja Wyborcza w Polsce 1991–2001.” Ed. Wybory Parlamentarne 1997 Roku. Ed. Markowski, Radek, Warsaw: ISP, 1999: 4972. Print.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. New Haven: Yale UP, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz. “Peculiarities of Post-communist Politics: The Case of Poland.” Studies in Comparative Communism 25.4 (1992): 341–61. Print.Google Scholar
Garlicki, Andrzej. Karuzela: Rzecz o Okraglym Stole. Warsaw: Czytelnik, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Gawin, Dariusz, ed. Lekcja Sierpnia: Dziedictwo “Solidarnosci” po dwudzistu lat. Warsaw: IFiS, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, Lawrence. Breaking the Barrier: The Rise of Solidarity in Poland. New York: Oxford UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Gowin, Jaroslaw. Kosciol w czasach wolnosci 1989–1999. Krakow: Znak, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Grabowska, Miroslawa. “‘Jako blyskawica’ Problemy z polityczna institucjonalizacja ruchu Solidarnośći.” Solidarność: Wydarzenie, konsekwencje, pamiec. Ed. Sulek, Antonii. Warsaw: IFiS, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Grabowska, Miroslawa. “Partie i elektoraty.” Budowanie Demokracji. Ed. Grabowska, Miroslawa and Szawiel, Tadeusz Warsaw: PWN, 2001: 164216. Print.Google Scholar
Grabowska, Miroslawa. Podzial postkommunistyczny: Spoleczne podstawy politiyki w Polsce po 1989 roku. Warsaw: Scholar, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Graniszewski, Leszek. “Akcja Wyborcza Solidarnosc – Sojusz Prawicy Demokratycznej.” Wybory ‘97: Partie i programy wyborcze. Ed. Gebethner, Stanislaw, Warsaw: Elipsa, 1997. 5985. Print.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Innes, Abby. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe.” East European Politics and Societies 17.1 (2003): 6473. Print.Google Scholar
Halas, Elzbieta. “Symboliczna konstrukcja Solidarnosci: Konflikt interpretacji i politika pamieci.” Solidarność: Wydarzenie, konsekwencje, pamiec. Ed. Sulek, Antoni, Warsaw: IFiS, 2006. 225–41. Print.Google Scholar
Home, Cynthia M.Late Lustration Programs in Romania and Poland: Supporting or Undermining Democratic Transitions?Democratization 16.2 (2009): 344–76. Print.Google Scholar
Horolets, Anna. Obrazy Europy w Polskim dyskusie publicznym. Krakow: Universitas, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. “The Europeanization of Polish Democracy.” Polish Sociological Review 164.4 (2008): 359–82. Print.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. “The New Populism in Poland: The Usual Suspects?Problems of Post-communism 55.3 (2008): 725. Print.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. “Portfel czy rozaniec? Ekonomiczne i aksjologiczne determinanty zachowan wyborczych.” Wybory parlamnetarne 1997 roku. Ed. Markowski, Radek, Warsaw: ISP, 1999: 75100. Print.Google Scholar
Katka, Krzyszof, Kursa, Magdalena, and Sandecki, Maciej. “Rząd świętuje, ‘S’ gwiżdże – podsumowanie obchodów 4 czerwca.” Gazeta Wyborcza. 5 June. 2009: 1, Print.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, et al. Post-communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Konstytucja Rzeczyposolitej Polskiej. Web. 10 June 2009. <http://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/polski/kon1.htm>..>Google Scholar
Kowalski, Sergiusz., Krytyka Solidanosciowego Rozumu. Warsaw: PEN, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Krzeminski, Ireneusz. Solidarnosc: Projekt polskiej democracji. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Kubik, Jan. “Entrepreneurship in Postcommunist Poland and Russia.” Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, Ed. Ekiert, Grzegorz and Hanson, Stephen E. New York: Cambridge UP, 2003: 317–51. Print.Google Scholar
Kubik, Jan. The Power of Symbols against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of Socialism in Poland. University Park: Penn State UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Kubik, Jan, and Linch, Amy. “The Original Sin of Poland's Third Republic: Discounting ‘Solidarity’ and its Consequences for Political Reconciliation.” Polish Sociological Review 153 (2006): 938. Print.Google Scholar
Laba, Roman. The Roots of Solidarity. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Lopinski, Maciej, Moski, Marcin, and Wilk, Mariusz. Konspira: Recz o podziemnej Solidarnosci. Paris: Spotkania, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Machaj, Lukasz. Za i przeciw Europie. Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwerstetu, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Markowski, Radoslaw. “Party System Institutionalization in New Democracies: Poland – A Trend Setter with No Followers.” Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-communist Europe: The First Decade, Ed. Lewis, Paul G., London: Cass, 2001: 5577. Print.Google Scholar
Markowski, Radoslaw. ‘The Polish Election of 2005: Pure Chaos or Restructuring of the Party System?” West European Politics 29.4 (2006): 814–32. Print.Google Scholar
Markowski, Radoslaw. “The 2007 Polish Parliamentary Election: Some Structuring Still a Lot of Chaos.” West European Politics 31.5 (2008): 1055–68. Print.Google Scholar
Marody, Mira. “Perceptions of Politics in Polish Society.” Social Research 57.2 (1990): 257–74. Print.Google Scholar
Marody, Mira. “Sens zbiorowy a stabilnosc i zmiana ladu spolecznego.” Rzeczywistosc Polska a sposoby radzenia sobie z nia, Ed. Marody, Mira and Sulek, Antonin. Warsaw: Uniwersytet Warszawski, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Matynia, Elzbieta. “The Lost Treasure of Solidarity.” Social Research 68.4 (2001): 917–36. Print.Google Scholar
Meardi, Guglielmo. “The Legacy of ‘Solidarity': Class, Democracy, Culture and Subjectivity in the Polish Social Movement.” Social Movement Studies 4.3 (2005): 261–80. Print.Google Scholar
Michnik, Adam. Letters from Freedom: Post-Cold War Realities and Perspectives. Berkeley: U of California P, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Millard, Francis. “Party Politics in Poland after the 2005 Elections.” Reinventing Poland: Economic and Political Transformation and Evolving National Identity, Ed. Myant, Martin R. and Cox, Terry, Florence, KY: Routledge, 2008: 6581. Print.Google Scholar
Millard, Francis. “Poland's Politics and the Travails of the Transition after 2001: The 2005 Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 58.7 (2006): 1007–31. Print.Google Scholar
Narojek, Winicjusz. “The Processes of Group Formation in a Nationalized Society.” Sisyphus: Sociological Studies 5 (1989): 6784. Print.Google Scholar
Nowak, Stefan. Spoleczenstwo Polskie czasu kryzysu. Warsaw: Instytut Socjologii UW, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe.” Social Research 58.4 (1991): 865–92. Print.Google Scholar
Ost, David. The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Post-communist Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Ost, David. “The Politics of Interest in Post-communist East Europe.” Theory and Society 22.4 (1993): 453–86. Print.Google Scholar
Pearce, Susan. “The Polish Solidarity Movement in Retrospect: In Search of a Meemonic Mirror.” International Journal of Politics, Culture & Society 22.2 (2009): 159–82. Print.Google Scholar
Program Gospodarczy. Glowne zalozenia i kierunki. Warsaw: Rzeczpospolita, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Puchalska, Bogusia. “Polish Democracy in Transition?Political Studies 53.4 (2005): 816–32. Print.Google Scholar
Rae, Gavin. “Back to the Future: The Resurgence of Poland's Conservative Right.” Debatte 15.2 (2007): 221–32. Print.Google Scholar
Renwick, Alan. “Why Hungary and Poland Differed in 1989: The Role of Medium-Term Frames in Explaining the Outcomes of Democratic Transition.” Democratization 13.1 (2006): 3657. Print.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Tina. The Haunted Land: Facing Europe's Ghosts after Communism. New York: Vantage, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Rychard, Andrzej. “Przestrzen Instytucjonalna.” Strategic i System, Ed. Giza-Polesczuk, Anna, Marody, Miroslawa and Rychard, Andrzej, Warsaw: IFiS, 2000. 167204. Print.Google Scholar
Rychard, Andrzej. Wladza i interesy w gospodarce. Warsaw: Uniwersytet Warszawski, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Seleny, Anna. “Communism's Many Legacies in East Central Europe.” Journal of Democracy 18.3 (2007): 156–70. Print.Google Scholar
Selinger, Marta. “Intolerance towards Gays and Lesbians in Poland.” Human Rights Review 9 (2008): 1527. Print.Google Scholar
Shields, Stuart. “From Socialist Solidarity to Neo-populist Neoliberalization? The Paradoxes of Poland's Post-communist Transition.” Capital and Class 93 (2007): 159–78. Print.Google Scholar
Slodkowska, Inka, and Dolbakowska, Magdalena. Wybory 2005: Partie i ich program, Ed. Slodowska, Inka and Dolbakowska, Magdalena. Warsaw: ISP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Smolar, Alexander. “Poland's Emerging Party System.” Journal of Democracy 9.2 (1998): 122–33. Print.Google Scholar
Spiewak, Pawel. “The Battle for a Constitution.” East European Constitutional Review 6.2/3 (1997). Print.Google Scholar
Szawiel, Tadeusz. “Spoleczenstwo Obywatelskie.” Budowanie Demokracji, Ed. Grabowska, Miroslawa and Szawiel, Tadeusz, Warsaw: PWN, 2001. 128–63. Print.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. “The Birth of a Bipolar Party System or a Referendum on a Polarizing Government? The October 2007 Polish Parliamentary Election.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24.3 (2008): 415–43. Print.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. “Europe and the October 2007 Polish Parliamentary Election.” EPERN Election Briefing 37 (2008): 113. Print.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. “The European Parliament Election in Poland, 7 June 2009.” EPERN European Parliament Election Briefing 36 (2009): 112. Print.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. “Interests and Values: Polish Parties and their Electorates.” Europe-Asia Studies 51.8 (1999): 1401–32. Print.Google Scholar
Szudrowicz, Alojzy comp. Solidarnosc 1980–1981. Bydgoszcz: Margrafsen, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
“Tusk na Wawelu z przywódcami Europy Środkowej, Kaczyński w Gdańsku z ‘Solidarnością'.” Rzeczpospolita 5 June 2009: 1. Print.Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada A. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada A.Tempered by the EU? Political Parties and Party Systems before and after Accession.” Journal of European Public Policy 15.6 (2008): 861–79. Print.Google Scholar
Vinton, Louise. “Solidarity's Rival Offspring: Center Alliance and Democratic Action.” Radio Free Europe Report on Eastern Europe 1.38 (21 Sept. 1990): 1525. Print.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Michael. “Solidarity and Akcja Wyborcza ‘Solidarnosc'. An Attempt at Reviving the Legend.” Communist and Post-communist Studies 31.2 (1998): 139–56. Print.Google Scholar
Wildstein, Bronislaw. Długi cień PRL-u: czyli, dekomunizacja której nie było. Krakow: Arcana, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Zubrzycki, Genevieve. “‘We, the Polish Nation': Ethnic and Civic Visions of Nationhood in Post-communist Constitutional Debates.” Theory and Society 30.5 (2001): 629–68. Print.Google Scholar