Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:42:40.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Romania is a family and it needs a strict father: conceptual metaphors at work in radical right populist discourses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Ov Cristian Norocel
Ov Cristian Norocel*
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland; Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Sweden
*
*Email: cristian.norocel@helsinki.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigating Romanian radical right populism, I evidence the gendered nature of conceptual metaphors and provide insights on the specific masculinities that they underpin in such political discourses. With the 2004 presidential elections as a backdrop, the analysis focuses on how the radical right populist candidates articulated in their discourses the conceptual metaphor of the “strict father.” At first, the theoretical standpoints on conceptual metaphors are corroborated with the conceptualization of populist charismatic leadership. Subsequently, a gendered perspective is added to the populist conceptualizations. The leaders’ self-representation as messianic fathers of the national family is evidenced by investigating their discursive appeals to protect, discipline and punish the people. Furthermore, I elaborate how conceptual metaphors may be employed to consolidate a position of uncontested leadership and moral superiority of the radical right populist leaders.

Keywords

Romaniaconceptual metaphormasculinitiesstrict fatherradical right populism
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 38 , Issue 5 , September 2010 , pp. 705 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, Kathleen, and Yat Mei Lee, Sophia. “Gender versus Politics: When Conceptual Models Collide in the US Senate.” Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Ed. Ahrens, Kathleen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 62–82. Print.Google Scholar
Albertazzi, Daniele. “The Lega dei Ticinesi: The Embodiment of Populism.” Politics 26.2 (2006): 133–39. Print.Google Scholar
Becali, George. Target Cotroceni (Destinaţia Cotroceni, DC). Production Direction of TVR1. 26 Nov. 2004. Television.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren, and Warner, Michael. “Sex in Public.” Critical Inquiry 22.2 (1998): 547–66. Print.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies XLVII (1999): 2–16. Print.Google Scholar
Carney, Gemma. “Data, Anecdote and Metaphor in Gender Equality Policy-Making: Merging ‘Intellectual and Real World Mainstreaming'.” Political Language and Metaphor. Interpreting and Changing the World. Eds. Carver, Terrell and Pikalo, Jernej. London: Routledge, 2008. 165–81. Print.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. Men in Political Theory. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. “Real Construction through Metaphorical Language: How Animals and Machines (amongst other Metaphors) Make the (Hu)man (what ‘he’ is).” Political Language and Metaphor. Interpreting and Changing the world. Eds. Carver, Terrell and Pikalo, Jernej. London: Routledge, 2008. 151–64. Print.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. “The Machine in the Man.” Rethinking the Man question. Sex, Gender and Violence in International Relations. Eds. Parpart, Jane L. and Zalewski, Marysia. London: Zed, 2008. 70–86. Print.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. Politicians and Rhetoric: the Persuasive Power or Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Chen, Cheng. “The Roots of Illiberal Nationalism in Romania: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis of the Leninist Legacy.” East European Politics and Societies 17.2 (2003): 166–201. Print.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. “Bush's and Gore's Language and Gestures in the 2000 US Presidential Debates: A Test Case for two Models of Metaphors.” Journal of Language and Politics 3.3 (2004): 409–40. Print.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. “Metaphor in the ‘Strict Father’ and ‘Nurturant Parent’ Cognitive Models: Theoretical Issues Raised in an Empirical Study.” Cognitive Linguistics 16.2 (2005): 279–312. Print.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia. From Where We Stand: War, Women's Activism and Feminist Analysis. London: Zed, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Collinson, David, and Hearn, Jeff. “Men and Masculinities in Work, Organizations, and Management.” Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities. Eds. Kimmel, Michael S., Hearn, Jeff, and Connell, R.W. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2005. 289–310. Print.Google Scholar
Deignan, Alice. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
De Landtsheer, Christ'l. “The Political Rhetoric of a Unified Europe.” Politically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Public Sphere. Eds. Feldman, Ofer, and De Landtsheer, Christ'l. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood, 1998. 129–45. Print.Google Scholar
Downs, William, and Miller, Raluca. “The 2004 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections in Romania.” Electoral Studies 25 (2006): 409–15. Print.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. “Semiosis, Ideology and Mediation: A Dialectical View.” Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies. Eds. Lassen, Inger, Strunck, Jeanne and Vestergaard, Torben. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. 19–36. Print.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Kligman, Gail. Reproducing Gender. Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Geden, Oliver. “The Discursive Representation of Masculinity in the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ).” Journal of Language and Politics 4.3 (2005): 397–420. Print.Google Scholar
“Gigi Becali a fost invins de Oana Pellea.” Evenimentul Zilei 14 Mar. 2006. Web. 4 May 2010.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Grunberg, Laura. “Women's NGOs in Romania.” Reproducing Gender. Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism. Eds. Gal, Susan and Kligman, Gail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2000. 307–36. Print.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. Female Masculinity, Durham, NC: Duke UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Haste, Helen. The Sexual Metaphor. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Howard, Harry. “Age/Gender Morphemes Inherit the Biases of their Underlying Dimensions.” Language and Ideology. Volume 1: Cognitive Theoretical Approaches. Eds. Dirven, René, Hawkins, Bruce and Sandikcioglu, Esra. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2001. 165–95. Print.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. “Cognitive Shortcuts.” Rethinking the Man Question. Sex, Gender and Violence in International Relations. Eds. Parpart, Jane and Zalewski, Marysia. London: Zed, 2008. 23–46. Print.Google Scholar
Ieţcu-Fairclough, Isabela. “Branding and Strategic Manoeuvring in the Romanian Presidential Election of 2004.” Journal of Language and Politics 7.3 (2008): 372–90. Print.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. “Racist Manipulation within Austrian, German, Dutch, French and Italian Rightwing Populism.” Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Eds. de Saussure, Louis and Schulz, Peter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. 213–36. Print.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Max H. Queer Theory and Social Change. London, UK: Routledge, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Korkut, Umut. “Nationalism versus Internationalism: The Roles of Political and Cultural Elites in Interwar and Communist Romania.” Nationalities Papers 34.2 (2006): 131–55. Print.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Cary, NC: Oxford UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dusk.” Social Research 62.2 (1995): 177–213. Print.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. Moral Politics. What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Leustean, Lucian N. “'For the Glory of Romanians': Orthodoxy and Nationalism in Greater Romania, 1918-1945.” Nationalities Papers 35.4 (2007): 717–42. Print.Google Scholar
Lillian, Donna. “A Thorn by Any Other Name: Sexist Discourse as Hate Speech.” Discourse & Society 18.6 (2007): 719–40. Print.Google Scholar
Maasen, Sabine, and Weingart, Peter. Metaphors and the Dynamics of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Governance and Opposition 39.3 (2004): 541–63. Print.Google Scholar
Noble, Jean Bobby. Masculinities without Men? Vancouver, BC: U of British Columbia P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Ringman, Erik. “Metaphors of Social Order.” Political Language and Metaphor. Interpreting and Changing the World. Eds. Carver, Terrell and Pikalo, Jernej. London: Routledge, 2008. 57–68. Print.Google Scholar
Rydgren, Jens. “Meso-level Reasons for Racism and Xenophobia: Some Converging and Diverging Effects of Radical Right Populism in France and Sweden.” European Journal of Social Theory 6.1 (2003): 45–68. Print.Google Scholar
Sego, P. Lewis. “Philistines, Barbarians, Aliens, et alii: Cognitive Semantics in Political ‘Otherness'.” Language and Ideology. Volume 2: Cognitive Descriptive Approaches. Eds. Dirven, René, Frank, Roslyn and Ilie, Cornelia. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2001. 107–16. Print.Google Scholar
Shafir, Michael. “From Historical to ‘Dialectical’ Populism: The Case of Post-Communist Romania.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 50.3/4 (2008): 425–70. Print.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir. Fantasies of Salvation: Democracy, Nationalism and Myth in Post Communist Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir. “Hypotheses on Populism: The Politics of Charismatic Protest.” East European Politics and Societies 15.1 (2000): 10–7. Print.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir and Kligman, Gail. “Romania's First Post-Communist Decade: From Iliescu to Iliescu.” East European Constitutional Review 10.1 (2001): 78–85. Print.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir and Pavel, Dan. “Romania's Mystical Revolutionaries: The Generation of Angst and Adventure Revisited.” East European Politics and Societies 8.3 (1994): 402–38. Print.Google Scholar
Tudor, Corneliu Vadim. Target Cotroceni (Destinaţia Cotroceni, DC). Production Direction of TVR1. 26 Nov. 2004. Television.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine. What was Socialism, and What Comes Next? Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Vertessen, Dieter, and De Landtsheer, Christ'l. “A Metaphorical Election Style. Use of Metaphor at Election Time.” Political Language and Metaphor. Interpreting and changing the world. Eds. Carver, Terrell and Pikalo, Jernej. London: Routledge, 2008. 271–85. Print.Google Scholar