Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:28:13.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-attribution and identity of ethnic-German SpätAussiedler repatriates from the former USSR: an example of fast-track assimilation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bernhard Köppen
Bernhard Köppen*
Affiliation:
Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (Federal Agency for Population Research), Wiesbaden, Germany. Email: bernhard.koeppen@bib.bund.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Repatriates – so-called SpätAussiedler – from republics of the former Soviet Union are one of the most important groups of immigrants in the Federal Republic of Germany. Granted German citizenship based on ethnicity, German policy supposed fast and smooth assimilation. Despite the fact that SpätAussiedler had advantages for structural and social integration into German society compared to immigrants of non-German descent and indications of rather smooth integration, the initial hopes for fast assimilation prove to be exaggerated. Instead, as revealed by a survey and interviews on the ethnic self-identification, cultural habits, and linguistic behavior of SpätAussiedler, a hybrid “Russian-German” identity has emerged amongst many repatriates.

Keywords

repatriatesSpätAussiedler, assimilationidentityself-attribution
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 105 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alba, Richard, Logan, John, Lutz, Amy, and Stults, Brain. 2002. “Only English by the Third Generation? Loss and Preservation of the Mother Tongue Among the Grandchildren of Contemporary Immigrants.” Demography 39 (3): 467–484.Google Scholar
Alba, Richard, and Victor, Nee. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” International Migration Review 31 (4): 826–874.Google Scholar
Bade, Klaus J., and Oltmer, Jochen. 2004. Normalfall Migration. ZeitBilder, Bd. 15. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Basch, Linda, Schiller, Nina, and Szanton Blanc, Cristina. 1994. Nations unbound. Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Bean, Frank D., and Stevens, Gillian. 2005. America's Newcomers and the Dynamics of Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation (American Sociological Association's Rose series in sociology).Google Scholar
Bergner, Christophe. 2006. “Die Russlanddeutschen zwischen nationaler Wiedergutmachung und allgemeiner Zuwanderungspolitik. Manuscript.” Speech at 60 Jahre Göttinger Arbeitskreis e.V., December 21. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Reden/DE/2006/12/pstb_festvortrag_goettingerarbeitskreis.html.Google Scholar
Blickle, Peter. 2004. Heimat. A Critical Theory of the German Idea of Homeland. Repr. in paperback. Rochester, NY: Camden House (Studies in German literature, linguistics, and culture).Google Scholar
Brubaker, Roger. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in Germany and France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Diener, Alexander. 2006. “Homeland as Social Construct: Territorialization among Kazakhstan's Germans and Koreans.” Nationalities Papers 34 (2): 201–235.Google Scholar
Dufoix, Stephane. 2003. Diasporas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ehrkamp, Patricia. 2005. “Placing Identities. Transnational Practices and Local Attachments of Turkish Immigrants in Germany.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (2): 345–364. doi: 10.1080/1369183042000339963.Google Scholar
Ehrkamp, Patricia. 2006. “'We Turks Are No Germans': Assimilation Discourses and the Dialectical Construction of Identities in Germany.” Environment and Planning A 38: 1673–1692.Google Scholar
Esser, Hartmut. 2001. Integration und ethnische Schichtung. Arbeitspapiere Nr. 40. Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für empirische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Faist, Thomas. 2000. The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frik, Olga. 2005. “Integration zu welchem Preis?” In Transkulturalität und Identität. Bildungsprozesse zwischen Exklusion und Inklusion, edited by Datta, Asit, 139–152. Frankfurt am Main: Iko-Verlag.Google Scholar
Glazer, Nathan. 1953. “The Study of Man: America's Ethnic Pattern.” Commentary, January 4.Google Scholar
Schiller, Glick, Nina, , Basch, Linda, and Szanton-Blanc, Cristina. 1995. “From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration.” Anthropological Quarterly 68 (1): 48–63.Google Scholar
Gogolin, Ingrid. 2003. “'Das ist doch kein gutes Deutsch’ – Über Vorstellungen von ‘guter’ Sprache und ihren Einfluss auf Mehrsprachigkeit.” In Plurilingualität und Identität. Zur Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung mehrsprachiger Menschen, edited by Florio-Hansen, Ines and Adelheid, Hu, 59–71. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Göler, Daniel, and Lautenbacher, Reinhard. 2010. “Halb Deutscher, halb Russe. Integration und Segregation jugendlicher Aussiedler – Eine exemplarische Untersuchung des Bamberger Malerviertels.” Mitteilungen der Fränkischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 57: 31–50.Google Scholar
Gordon, Milton. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haug, Sonja, and Sauer, Lenore. 2007. “Aussiedler, SpätAussiedler, Russlanddeutsche. Berufliche, sprachliche und soziale Integration.” Osteuropa 57 (11): 252–266.Google Scholar
Heinen, Ute. 2000. “Zuwanderung und Integration in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” In Aussiedler, Informationen zur politischen. Bildung, 267/2000, edited by für politische Bildung, Bundeszentrale, 36–49. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Hess, Christin. 2008. “The Contested Terrain of the Parallel Society: The Other Natives in Contemporary Greece and Germany.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (9): 1519–1537.Google Scholar
Hess, Christin, and Green, Simon. 2016. “Introduction: The Changing Politics and Policies of Migration in Germany.” German Politics 25 (3): 315–328.Google Scholar
Hill, Paul B., and Schnell, Rainer. 1990. “Was ist Identität?” In Generation und Identität: theoretische und empirische Beiträge zur Migrationssoziologie. Studien zur Sozialwissenschaft. Bd. 97, edited by Hartmut Esser and Jürgen Friedrichs, 25–42. Opladen: Vieweg+Teubner.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Marianne. 1997. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative and Postmemory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kasinitz, Philip. 2012. “The Sociology of International Migration: Where We Have Been; Where Do We Go from Here?” Sociological Forum 27 (3): 579–590.Google Scholar
Krieger, Viktor. 2015. Kolonisten, Sowjetdeutsche, Aussiedler. Eine Geschichte der Russlanddeutschen. Schriftenreihe der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Band 1631. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas-S, Arango, Joaquin, Hugo, Graeme, Kouaouci, Ali, Pellegrino, Adela, and Edward Taylor, J. 1993. “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal.” Population and Development Review 19 (3): 431–466.Google Scholar
Münz, Rainer, and Ohlinger, Rainer. 2003. “Diasporas and Ethnic Migrants in Twentieth-Century Europe: A Comparative Perspective.” In Diasporas and Ethnic Migrants: Germany, Israel, and Post-Soviet Space in Comparative Perspective, edited by Münz, Rainer and Ohlinger, Rainer, 2–15. Oxford: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Nagel, Caroline R., and Staeheli, Lynn A. 2008. “Integration and the Negotiation of ‘Here’ and ‘There': The Case of British Arab Activists.” Social and Cultural Geography 9 (4): 415–430.Google Scholar
Noyes, Noelle. 2004. “Die Integration der SpätAussiedler in den alten und neuen Bundesländern. Ein Vergleich der Städte Garbsen und Strausberg.” In Bevölkerungsgeographische Forschung zur Migration und Integration. Vorträge gehalten auf der 5. Tagung des Arbeitskreises Migration – Integration – Minderheiten der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Demographie (DGD). In Zusammenarbeit mit dem Arbeitskreis Bevölkerungsgeographie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geographie in Bern am 2. Oktober 2003, H. 112, edited by Frank Swiaczny and Sonja Haug, 27–52. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Phillips, Deborah, Davis, Cathy, and Ratcliffe, Peter. 2007. “British Asian Narratives of Urban Space.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (2): 217–234. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00247.x.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1997. “Immigration Theory for a new Century: Some Problems and Opportunities.” The International Migration Review 31 (4): 799–825.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 2001. “Introduction: The Debates and Significance of Immigrant Transnationalism.” Global Networks 1 (3): 181–194.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Rumbaut, Ruben G. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, Vickstrom, Erik, and Aparicio, Rosa. 2011. “Coming of Age in Spain: The Self-Identification, Beliefs and Self-Esteem of the Second Generation.” The British Journal of Sociology 62 (3): 387–417.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Zhou, Min. 1993. ‘The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530: 74–96.Google Scholar
Pries, Ludger. 1998. “'Transmigranten’ als ein Typ von Arbeitswanderern in pluri-lokalen sozialen Räumen.” Soziale Welt 49: 135–150.Google Scholar
Rebhun, Uzi. 2014. “Immigrant Acculturation and Transnationalism: Israelis in the United States and Europe Compared.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53 (3): 613–635.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Gabriele, Stephan, Viola, and Radenbach, Niklas. 2011. Brüchige Zugehörigkeiten. Wie sich Familien von ‘Russlanddeutschen’ ihre Geschichte erzählen. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
Savoskul, Maria. 2005. “Abschottung Oder Integration?” Mitteilungen der Fränkischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 52: 69–86.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Bernhardt, Angela. 2008. Jugendliche (Spät)Aussiedlerinnen. Bildungserfolg im Verborgenen. Marburg: Tectum.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Anett. 2013. Transnational leben. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Schönwälder, Karen, and Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos. 2016. “The New Differentialism: Responses to Immigrant Diversity in Germany.” German Politics 25 (3): 366–380. doi:10.1080/09644008.2016.1194397.Google Scholar
Takle, Marianne. 2011. “(Spät)Aussiedler: From Germans to Immigrants.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 17 (2): 161–181.Google Scholar
Tsuda, Takeyuki. 2010. “Ethnic Return, Migration and the Nation-State: Encouraging the Diaspora to Return ‘Home'.” Nations and Nationalisms 16 (3): 616–636.Google Scholar
Valentine, Gill, Sporton, Deborah, and Bang Nielsen, Katrine. 2009. “Identities and Belonging: A Study of Somali Refugee and Asylum Seekers Living in the UK and Denmark.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27 (2): 234–250.Google Scholar
Waldinger, Roger. 2008. “Between ‘Here’ and ‘There'. Immigrant Cross-Border Activities and Loyalties.” International Migration Review 42 (1): 3–29. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00112.x.Google Scholar
Waters, Mary C., and Jimenez, Tomas R. 2005. “Assessing Immigrants’ Assimilation: New Empirical and Theoretical Challenges.” Annual Review of Sociology 31 (1): 75–91.Google Scholar
Woellert, Franzsika, Kröhnert, Steffen, Sippel, Lilli, and Klingholz, Reiner. 2009. Ungenutzte Potenziale. Zur Lage der Integration in Deutschland. Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung.Google Scholar
Worbs, Susanne, Bund, Eva, Kohls, Martin, and Babka von Gostomsk, Christian. 2013. (Spät-) Aussiedler in Deutschland: eine Analyse aktueller Daten und Forschungsergebnisse. Forschungsbericht. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
Yağmur, Kutlay, and van de Vijver, Fons J. R. 2012. “Acculturation and Language Orientations of Turkish Immigrants in Australia, France, Germany, and the Netherlands.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43 (7): 1110–1130.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214. doi:10.1080/00313220600769331.Google Scholar
Zentralrat der Juden in Deutschland/Central Council of Jews in Germany. 2009. “Twenty Years of Jewish Immigration to Germany.” Media service September 22. Berlin, September 16/28 Tishri 5770. Accessed March 12, 2015. http://www.zentralratdjuden.de/en/article/2693.twenty-years-of-jewish-immigration-to-germany.html.Google Scholar
Zeveleva, Olga. 2014. “Political Aspects of Repatriation: Germany, Russia, Kazakhstan. A Comparative Analysis.” Nationalities Papers 42 (5): 808–827.Google Scholar