Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:23:12.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sovereignty, networks, and norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Stephen Deets*
Affiliation:
History and Society Division, Babson College, Babson Park, MA, USA. Email: sdeets@babson.edu

Extract

Despite considerable scholarly work on ethnic mobilization, less attention has been paid to explicitly examining how differing notions of the state undergird our analysis and normative approaches. As the title of Ted Gurr's Peoples versus States reminds us, the state is central to these processes. Similarly, there seems to be widespread, yet little discussed, disagreement on the proper role of politics in ethno-politics. In other words, at what point do we shrug our shoulders and say, “minority X lost this political fight and that's the way democratic politics functions”? The three books here focus on vastly different topics (international minority rights norms, Native American struggles, and the Holy Roman Empire's decline), but in reading them together it is striking how their notions of the state and politics lead us to varying conclusions about the possibilities for minorities.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Csergo, Zsuzsa, and Goldgeier, James M.Nationalist Strategies and European Integration.” Perspectives on Politics 2.1 (2004): 2137. Print.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. Peoples versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 2000. Print.Google Scholar