Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:15:14.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was the emergence of Russian national identity merely a historical accident?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Leonid Luks
Leonid Luks*
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany
*
*Email: leonid.luks@ku-eichstaett.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

David Brandenberger provides, in his recent Nationalities Paper discussion paper “Stalin's populism and the accidental creation of Russian national identity” an interesting and plausible argument. However, his article contains several, to my view, controversial and unconvincing assumptions which is why I would like to add the below critical remarks to those already made by David R. Marples and Andreas Umland.

Type
Debate
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 135 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berdiaev, Nikolai. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma. Paris: YMCA-PRESS, 1955. Print.Google Scholar
Brandenberger, David. “Nationalist, heretic or populist?” Nationalities Papers 38.5 (2010). 757–60. Print.Google Scholar
Brandenberger, David. “Stalin's populism and the accidental creation of Russian national identity.” Nationalities Papers, 38.5 (2010). 723–39. Print.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Sergei. Avtobiograficheskie zametki. Paris: YMCA-Press, 1946. Print.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Sergei. Dva Grada. Moskva: Put', 2, 1911. Print.Google Scholar
Fedotov, Georgii. “Novyi idol”. Sud'ba i grekhi Rossii. Sankt Peterburg: Sofiya, 2, 1991. 50–65. Print.Google Scholar
Fedotov, Georgii. “Revoliutsiia idet.” Sud'ba i grekhi Rossii: Izbrannye stat'i po filosofii russkoi istorii i kul'tury. Sankt Peterburg: Sofiya, 1, 1991. 127–72. Print.Google Scholar
Fedotov, Georgii. “Sotsial'nyi vopros i svoboda.” Sovremennye zapiski 47 (1931). 421–38. Print.Google Scholar
Fedotov, Georgii. “Sumerki otechestva.” Sud'ba i grekhi Rossii. Sankt Peterburg: Sofiya, 1, 1991. 320–28. Print.Google Scholar
Gefter, Michail. Iz tekh i etikh let. Moskva: Progress, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Geller, Mikhail and Nekrich, Alexander: Utopiia u vlasti: Istoriia Sovetskogo Soiuza s 1917 goda do nashikh dnei. London: OPI, 1, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Hahlweg, Werner. Lenins Rückkehr nach Russland: Die deutschen Akten. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
Heresch, Elisabeth. Geheimakte Parvus: Die gekaufte Revolution. Biographie. München: Langen Müller, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Leontovitsch, Viktor. Die Rechtsumwälzung unter Iwan dem Schrecklichen und die Ideologie der russischen Selbstherrschaft. Stuttgart: K.F. Koehler, 1947. Print.Google Scholar
Luks, Leonid. “Die Sehnsucht nach der ‘organischen nationalen Einheit’ und die ‘jüdische Frage': Das publizistische Werk Fedor Dostoevskiis und Heinrich von Treitschkes.” Zwei Gesichter des Totalitarismus: Bolschewismus und Nationalsozialismus im Vergleich. 16 Skizzen. Köln: Böhlau, 2007. 13–44. Print.Google Scholar
Maklakov, Vasilii. Iz vospominanii. New York: Izdatel'stvo imeni Chekhova, 1954. Print.Google Scholar
Marples, David R. “Stalin: authoritarian populist or great Russian chauvinist?” Nationalities Papers 38.5 (2010). 749–756. Print.Google Scholar
Miliukov, Pavel. Vospominania 1859–1917. New York: Izdatel'stvo imeni Chekhova, 1, 1955. Print.Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard. Die russische Revolution. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2, 1991–92. Print.Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard. Struve: Liberal of the Right. Cambridge MA: Harvard UP, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Plotnikov, Nikolai and Kolerov, Modest. “‘Den inneren Deutschen besiegen': Nationalliberale Kriegspsychologie in Russland 1914–1917.” Verführungen der Gewalt. Russen und Deutsche im Ersten und Zweiten Weltkrieg. Eds. Eimermacher, Karl, Volpert, Astrid, and Bordiugov, Gennadii. München: Wilhelm Fink, 2005. 31–70. Print.Google Scholar
Service, Robert. Lenin: Eine Biographie. München: C. H. Beck, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Souvarine, Boris. Stalin: Anmerkungen zur Geschichte des Bolschewismus. München: Bernard & Graefe, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Struve, Petr. “Istoricheskii smysl russkoi revoliutsii.” Iz glubiny: Sbornik statei o russkoi revoliutsii i natsional'nye zadachi. Paris: YMCA–Press, 1967. 289–306. Print.Google Scholar
Struve, Petr. Izbrannye sochineniia, Moskva: Rosspen, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Struve, Petr. “Otryvki o gosudarstve.” Izbrannye sochineniia, Moskva: Rosspen, 1999. 202–210. Print.Google Scholar
Struve, Petr. “Velikaia Rossiia: Iz razmyshlenii o probleme russkogo mogushchestva.” Izbrannye sochineniia, Moskva: Rosspen, 1999. 182–201. Print.Google Scholar
Tsereteli, Iraklii. Vospominaniia o fevral'skoi revoliutsii. Paris: La Haye, 1963. Print.Google Scholar
Tyrkova–Williams, Ariadna. Na putiakh k svobode. London: Overseas Publications Interchange, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Umland, Andreas. “Stalin's russocentrism in historical and international context.” Nationalities Papers, 38.5 (2010). 741–748. Print.Google Scholar
Volkogonov, Dmitrii. Lenin. Düsseldorf: ECON, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Wat, Aleksander. Jenseits von Wahrheit und Luge. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Zeman, Zbynek. Germany and the revolution in Russia 1915–1918: Documents from the archives of the German Foreign Ministry. London: Oxford UP, 1958. Print.Google Scholar
Zeman, Zbynek and Schralau, Winfried. Freibeuter der Revolution: Parvus-HeIphand. Fine politische Biographie. Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik, 1964. Print.Google Scholar