No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2009
Recently, Bert Voskuil involved the Asser Institute and, in particular, its Department of International Commercial Arbitration in his keen interest in exploring ways and means of improving the functioning of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (‘PCA’) and of making it more attractive to parties to disputes. One cannot but approve this initiative as it is regrettable that the PCA is under-utilized whilst it has every potential in it to be a prominent forum for international arbitration.
1. International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1991).
2. Reproduced in Annex 3 of The Permanent Court of Arbitration — New Directions, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
3. Repoduced in II Yearbook Comin. Arb'n (1977) pp. 161–171, with a commentary by P. Sanders, idem pp. 178–223. See also van Hof, J.J., Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The Application by the Iran-US Claims Tribunal (1991).Google Scholar
4. See, Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission reproduced in Norberg, C., ‘General Introduction to Inter-American Commercial Arbitration’Google Scholar, Annex II, in van den Berg, A.J., ed., International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration.Google Scholar
5. See van den Berg, A.J., The Efficacy of Awards in International Commercial Arbitration, The Freshfields Arbitration Lecture, London, 27 05 1992, to be published in Arb. Int'1.Google Scholar