Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:15:51.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The belemnite zonation of the uppermost Cretaceous in the Maastricht-Aachen-Liège, Brabant-Méhaigne and Mons areas (Belgium, southeast Netherlands)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

N. Keutgen*
Affiliation:
KFPBR, Uniwersytet Techniczno-Przyrodniczy Bydgoszcz, ul. Bernardynska 6/8, PL-85 029 Bydgoszcz, Poland. Email: keutgen@utp.edu.pl

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An overview is presented of belemnitellid faunas of Santonian to Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) age in the Mons Basin and in the Brabant-Méhaigne and Maastricht-Aachen-Liège areas (Belgium, southeast Netherlands). As many as twenty-two species of the genera Actinocamax Miller, 1823, Gonioteuthis Bayle, 1878, Belemnitella d'Orbigny, 1840 and Belemnella Nowak, 1913 have been recorded to date. On the basis of these, thirteen zones can be distinguished: three in the Santonian (G. w. westfalica, G. westfalicagranulata and G. granulata), six in the Campanian (G. granulataquadrata, G. quadrata, Blt. mucronata, Blt. woodi, Blt. minor I and Blt. minor II) and four in the Maastrichtian (Bln. obtusa, Bln. ex gr. sumensis/cimbrica, Blt. junior and Bln. kazimiroviensis). Correlative schemes between these zones and those proposed for Norfolk (southeast England) and for the combined Lägerdorf-Kronsmoor-Hemmoor section (northern Germany) are presented. The belemnitellid assemblage of the study area closely resembles that of Norfolk, but differs from the late Campanian faunas of northwest Germany.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2011

Footnotes

*

In: Jagt, J.W.M., Jagt-Yazykova, E.A. & Schins, W.J.H. (eds): A tribute to the late Felder brothers – pioneers of Limburg geology and prehistoric archaeology.

References

Albers, H.-J., 1976. Feinstratigraphie, Faciesanalyse und Zyklen des Untercampans (Vaalser Grünsand = Hervien) von Aachen und dem niederländisch-belgischen Limburg. Geologisches Jahrbuch A34: 368.Google Scholar
Arkhangelsky, A.D., 1912. Verkhnemelovyya otlozheniya vostoka evropejskoy rossii. Materialy dlja Geologii Rossii 25: xxv + 1631.Google Scholar
Bayle, E., 1878. Fossiles principaux der terrains de la France. Explication de la carte géologique de la France 4(1), Atlas: 79 pls.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T., 1957. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from Denmark. Biologiske Skrifter fra det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 9: 169.Google Scholar
Bless, M.J.M., Felder, P.J. & Jagt, J.W.M., 1991. Repeated Tethyan influences in the early Campanian to middle late Maastrichtian successions of Folx-les-Caves and Orp-le-Petit (eastern Brabant Massif, Belgium). Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 113: 179197.Google Scholar
Bless, M.J.M., Felder, P.J. & Meessen, J.P.M.T., 1987. Late Cretaceous sea level rise and inversion: their influence on the developmental environment between Aachen and Antwerp. Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 109: 333355.Google Scholar
Brotzen, F., 1936. Foraminiferen aus dem Schwedischen untersten Senon von Eriksdal in Schonen. Årsbok Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C396: 1206.Google Scholar
Burnett, J.A., Gallagher, L.T. & Hampton, M.J., 1998. Upper Cretaceous. In: Brown, P.R. (ed.): Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy (British Micropalaeontological Society, Publication Series Vol. 6). Chapman and Hall, London: 132199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1975. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from the Kristianstad area in Scania. Fossils and Strata 7: 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1986. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from the Vomb Trough in Scania, Sweden. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning Ca57: 157.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1991. Belemnites from the Coniacian to Lower Campanian chalks of Norfolk and southern England. Palaeontology 34: 695749.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1993. Upper Cretaceous belemnitellids from the Båstad basin, southern Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 115: 3957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1994. Upper Cretaceous belemnites from Lonzée (SE Belgium) and their stratigraphical significance. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 64: 151158.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1995. Belemnitella from the Upper Campanian and Lower Maastrichtian Chalk of Norfolk, England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 51: 184.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1996. A review of the Upper Campanian and Maastrichtian belemnite biostratigraphy of Europe. Cretaceous Research 17: 751766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1997. The Late Cretaceous belemnite family Belemnitellidae: taxonomy and evolutionary history. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 44: 5988.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 1999. Upper Campanian and Lower Maastrichtian belemnites from the Mons Basin, Belgium. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 69: 97131.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 2000a. Belemnitella schulzi sp. nov. from the uppermost Campanian and lowest Maastrichtian chalks of northwest Germany and Denmark. Acta Geologica Polonica 50: 5566.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 2000b. Gradualistic evolution in Belemnitella from the middle Campanian of Lower Saxony, NW Germany. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 47: 135163.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., 2002. Fusiteuthis polonica, a rare and unusual belemnite from the Maastrichtian. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47: 679683.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K. & Schmid, F., 1987. The belemnites of the Vaals Formation from the C.P.L. quarry at Hallembaye in Belgium – taxonomy, biometry and biostratigraphy. Geologisches Jahrbuch A94: 337.Google Scholar
Christensen, W.K., Schmid, F. & Schulz, M.-G., 2004. Belemnitella from the Upper Maastrichtian of Hemmoor, Northwest Germany. Geologisches Jahrbuch A157: 2367.Google Scholar
Coquand, H., 1859. Synopsis des animaux et des végétaux fossiles observés dans la formation crétacée du Sud-Ouest de la France. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France (2)16: 9451023.Google Scholar
De Blainville, H.M.D., 1827. Mémoire sur les Bélemnites, considerées zoologiquement et géologiquement. F.G. Levrault, Paris: 1136.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A.D., 18401842. Paléontologie française; Terrains crétacés, 1. Céphalopodes. Masson (Paris): 1-120 (1840); 121-430 (1841); 431-662 (1842).Google Scholar
Ernst, G. & Schulz, M.-G., 1974. Stratigraphie und Fauna des Coniac und Santon im Schreibkreide-Richtprofil von Lägerdorf (Holstein). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 43: 560.Google Scholar
Felder, P.J., 1997. The Vijlen Chalk Member (Maastrichtian, Late Cretaceous) in the Meuse-Rhine Euregion. Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique 119 (for 1996): 119133.Google Scholar
Felder, P.J., 2001. Bioklasten-stratigrafie of ecozonatie voor het krijt (sic) (Santoniaan-Campaniaan-Maastrichtiaan) van Zuid-Limburg en oostelijk België. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Belgium 47: 1141.Google Scholar
Felder, W.M. & Bosch, P.W., 2000. Geologie van Nederland, Deel 5: Krijt van Zuid-Limburg. Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen (Utrecht): 1192.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T.P. & Wood, C.J., 1978. Cretaceous rocks. In: Wilson, H.E. & Manning, P.I. (eds): Geology of the Causeway Coast. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, Sheet 7(2): 85115.Google Scholar
Gale, A.S., Montgomery, P., Kennedy, W.J., Hancock, J.M., Burnett, J.A. & McArthur, J.M., 1995. Definition and global correlation of the Santonian-Campanian boundary. Terra Nova 7: 611622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, A.S., Kennedy, W.J., Lees, J.A., Petrizzo, M.R. & Walaszczyk, I., 2007. An integrated study (inoceramid bivalves, ammonites, calcareous nannofossils, planktonic foraminifera, stable carbon isotopes) of the Ten Mile Creek section, Lancaster, Dallas County, north Texas, a candidate global boundary stratotype section and point for the base of the Santonian stage. Acta Geologica Polonica 57: 113160.Google Scholar
Gale, A.S., Hancock, J.M., Kennedy, W.J., Petrizzo, M.R., Lees, J.A., Walaszczyk, I. & Wray, D.S., 2008. An integrated study (geochemistry, stable oxygen and carbon isotopes, nannofossils, planktonic foraminifera, inoceramid bivalves, ammonites and crinoids) of the Waxahachie Dam Spillway section, north Texas: a possible boundary stratotype for the base of the Campanian Stage. Cretaceous Research 29: 131167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J.M., Peake, N.B., Burnett, J., Dhondt, A.V., Kennedy, W.J. & Stokes, R.B., 1993. High Cretaceous biostratigraphy at Tercis, south-west France. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 63: 133148.Google Scholar
Hofker, J., 1961. Die Foraminiferen-Fauna der Gruben Hemmoor und Basbeck. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 35: 123145.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 1984. Nogmaals de groeve Ciments Portland Liègeois (sic) bij Hallembaye: biostratigrafische aantekeningen. Grondboor en Hamer 38: 149158.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 1996. Late Maastrichtian and Early Palaeocene index macrofossils in the Maastrichtian type area (SE Netherlands, NE Belgium). In: Brinkhuis, H. & Smit, J. (eds): The Geulhemmerberg Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary section (Maastrichtian type area, SE Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw 75: 153162.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 1999. Late Cretaceous-Early Palaeogene echinoderms and the K/T boundary in the southeast Netherlands and northeast Belgium – Part 1. Introduction and stratigraphy. Scripta Geologica 116: 157.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., 2010. Upper Cretaceous and Lower Paleogene in the type area of the Maastrichtian stage (70.6-65.5 Ma). Berichte-Reports, Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Kiel 23: 121.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., Burnett, J., Kennedy, W.J., 1995a. Campanian ammonites and nannofossils from southern Limburg, the Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 53: 4963.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., Felder, W.M. & Meessen, J.P.M.T., 1987. Het Boven-Campanien in Zuid-Limburg (Nederland) en Noordoost België. Natuurhistorisch Maandblad 76: 94110.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., Jagt-Yazykova, E.A. & Van Neer, R., 2009. Belemnellocamax ex gr. grossouvrei, a rare mid-Campanian belemnitellid (Cephalopoda, Coleoidea) from the Hannover area, Northern Germany. Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelej Prirody, Otdel Geologicheskii 84: 7882.Google Scholar
Jagt, J.W.M., Kennedy, W.J., Burnett, J.A., Christensen, W.K. & Dhondt, A.V., 1995b. Santonian macrofauna and nannofossils from northeast Belgium. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 65: 127137.Google Scholar
Janet, C., 1891. Note sur trois nouvelles bélemnites sénoniennes. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 19: 716721.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1948. Zur Kenntnis der Oberkreide der Dnjepr-Donetz-Senke und zum Vergleich der russischen borealen Oberkreide mit derjenigen Polens und Nordwesteuropas. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 70: 583602.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1949. Über den taxonomischen Wert einiger morphologischer Elemente des Rostrums der belemnitellenartigen Formen (Familie Belemnitellidae Pavlow, 1913), sowie über die Gattung Belemnella (Nowak, 1913, subg.) Jeletzky, 1941, ihre Phylogenie und einige Vertreter. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie B9: 257287.Google Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1951. The place of the Trimingham and Norwich Chalk in the Campanian-Maestrichtian succession. Geological Magazine 88: 197208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeletzky, J.A., 1958. Die jüngere Oberkreide (Oberconiac bis Maastricht) Südwestrusslands und ihr Vergleich mit der Nordwest- und Westeuropas. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch 33: 1157.Google Scholar
Johansen, B. & Surlyk, F., 1990. Brachiopods and the stratigraphy of the upper Campanian and lower Maastrichtian Chalk of Norfolk, England. Palaeontology 33: 823872.Google Scholar
Kaever, M. & Lommerzheim, A., 1991. Die Bohrung Metelen 1001. Stratigraphie, Palökologie und Fazies zyklischer Sedimente des Campans im nordwestlichen Münsterland (NW-Deutschland). Facies 24: 267284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W.J., 1986. The Campanian-Maastrichtian ammonite sequence in the environs of Maastricht (Limburg, the Netherlands), Limburg and Liège provinces (Belgium). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 16: 149168.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W.J., 1987. The ammonite fauna of the type Maastrichtian with a revision of Ammonites colligatus Binkhorst, 1861. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 56 (for 1986): 151267.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N., 1997. Belemnella (Belemnella) cf. praearkhangelskii Naidin, 1964 from the Vijlen Member at Altembroeck (NE Belgium, Early Maastrichtian). Geologie en Mijnbouw 75: 341347.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N. & Jagt, J.W.M., 1999. Late Campanian belemnite faunas from Liège-Limburg (NE Belgium, SE Netherlands). Geological Survey of Belgium, Professional Paper 1998/2 (287): 131.Google Scholar
Keutgen, N., Jagt, J.W.M., Felder, P.J. & Jagt-Yazykova, E.A., 2010. Stratigraphy of the upper Vijlen Member (Gulpen Formation; Maastrichtian) in northeast Belgium, the southeast Netherlands and the Aachen area (Germany), with special reference to belemnitellid cephalopods. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 89: 109136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keutgen, N. & Van der Tuuk, L.A., 1991. Belemnites from the Lower Maastrichtian of Limburg, Aachen and Liège. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 44 (for 1990): 139.Google Scholar
Kner, R., 1848. Versteinerungen des Kreidemergels von Lemberg und seiner Umgebung. W. Haidinger's naturwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 3: 142.Google Scholar
Kongiel, R., 1962. On belemnites from Maastrichtian, Campanian and Santonian sediments in the Middle Vistula Valley (Central Poland). Prace Muzeum Ziemi 5: 3140.Google Scholar
Marsson, T., 1878. Die Foraminiferen der weissen Schreibkreide der Insel Rügen. Mittheilungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Neu-Vorpommern und Rügen in Greifswald 10: 115196.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1823. Observations on the genus Actinocamax . Transactions of the Geological Society of London (2)2: 4562.Google Scholar
Moberg, J.C., 1885. Cephalopoderna i Sveriges kritsystem. II. Artsbeskrifning. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C73: 165.Google Scholar
Naidin, D.P., 1952. Verkhnemelovye belemnity zapadnoj Ukrainy. Trudy Moskovskogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta imemi S. Ordzhinikidze 27: 1126.Google Scholar
Naidin, D.P., 1964. Verkhnemelovye belemnitelly i belemnelly Russkoj platformy i nekotorykh sopredel'nykh oblastej. Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelej Prirody, Otdel geologicheskii 39: 8597.Google Scholar
Naidin, D.P., 1975. Late Maastrichtian belemnitellids of Eurasia. In: Menner, W.W., Moskvin, M.M., Naidin, D.P., Solovyev, A.N. & Shimansky, V.N. (eds): Evolution and change of the organic kingdom at the Mesozoic-Cainozoic boundary. Nauka (Moskva): 91108.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B., 2003. Late Campanian and Early Maastrichtian ammonites from the white chalk of Kronsmoor (northern Germany) – taxonomy and stratigraphy. Acta Geologica Polonica 53: 257281.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B., 2004. Late Campanian nostoceratid ammonites from the Lehrte West Syncline near Hannover, northern Germany. In: Wood, C.J., Walaszczyk, I., Marcinowski, R. & Tröger, K.-A. (eds): Gundolf Ernst Memorial Volume. Acta Geologica Polonica 54: 473487.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B., 2006. Multistratigraphische Gliederung der norddeutschen Schreibkreide (Coniac bis Maastricht), Korrelation von Aufschlüssen und Bohrungen. Zeitschrift der deutschen Gesellschaft Geowissenschaften 157: 245262.Google Scholar
Nowak, J., 1913. Untersuchungen über die Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide in Polen. III. Teil. Bulletin international de l'Académie des Sciences de Cracovie, Classe des Sciences mathématiques et naturelles B1913: 335415.Google Scholar
Odin, G.S., Hancock, J.M., Antonescu, E., Bonnemaison, M., Caron, M., Cobban, W.A., Dhondt, A.V., Gaspard, D., Ion, J., Jagt, J.W.M., Kennedy, W.J., Melinte, M., Néraudeau, D., Von Salis, K. & Ward, P.D., 1996. Definition of a Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Campanian/Maastrichtian boundary. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 66 (Supplement): 111117.Google Scholar
Ogg, J.G, Agterberg, F.P. & Gradstein, F.M., 2004. The Cretaceous period. In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G. & Smith, A.G. (eds): A geologic time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge): 344383.Google Scholar
Remin, Z., 2007. Analiza paleontologiczna i znaczenie stratygraficzne belemnitów górnego kampanu i dolnego mastrychtu profilu doliny środkowej Wisły. Archiwum Wydziau Geologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa (unpubl. PhD thesis): 1163.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F. & Christensen, W.K., 1989. The upper Campanian-Lower Maastrichtian chalks of the Mons Basin, Belgium: a preliminary study of belemnites and foraminifera in the Harmignies and Ciply areas. Geologie en Mijnbouw 68: 391408.Google Scholar
Robaszynski, F., Dhondt, A.V. & Jagt, J.W.M., 2002. Cretaceous lithostratigraphic units (Belgium). In: Bultynck, P. & Dejonghe, L. (eds): Guide to a revised lithostratigraphic scale of Belgium. Geologica Belgica 4 (2001): 121134.Google Scholar
Roemer, F.A., 18401841. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Kreidegebirges. Hahn'sche Hofbuchhandlung (Hannover): 1145.Google Scholar
Roemer, F., 1852. Kreidebildungen von Texas und ihre organischen Einschlüsse. Adolph Marcus (Bonn): vi + 1100.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C., 1876. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide, Teil 2. Palaeontographica 24: 123263.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., 1978. Zur Litho- und Biostratigraphie des Obercampan-Untermaastricht von Lägerdorf und Kronsmoor (SW-Holstein). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 7: 7389.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., 1979. Morphometrisch-variationsstatistische Untersuchungen zur Phylogenie der Belemniten-Gattung Belemnella im Untermaastricht NW-Europas. Geologisches Jahrbuch A47: 3157.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., 1982. Erster Nachweis der Belemnitengattung Belemnitella (B. pulchra n. sp.) im mittleren Untermaastricht NW-Deutschlands. Geologisches Jahrbuch A61: 279293.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G., Ernst, G., Ernst, H., & Schmid, F., 1984. Coniacian to Maastrichtian stage boundaries in the standard section of the Upper Cretaceous White Chalk of NW Germany (Lägerdorf-Kronsmoor-Hemmoor): definition and proposals. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 33: 203215.Google Scholar
Schulz, M.-G. & Schmid, F., 1983. Das Ober-Maastricht von Hemmoor (N-Deutschland): Faunenzonen-Gliederung und Korrelation mit dem Ober-Maastricht von Dänemark und Limburg. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 13: 2139.Google Scholar
Skołozdrówna, Z., 1932. Znaczenie alveoli i szczeliny alveolarneij dla systematiki rodzaju Belemnitella (sic). Posiedzienia Naukowe Panstwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 33: 117.Google Scholar
Slimani, H., Louwye, S., Dusar, M. & Lagrou, D., 2011. Connecting the Chalk Group of the Campine Basin to the dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy of the Campanian to Danian in borehole Meer (northernmost Belgium). In: Jagt, J.W.M., Jagt-Yazykova, E.A. & Schins, W.J.H. (eds): A tribute to the late Felder brothers – pioneers of Limburg geology and prehistoric archaeology. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 90: 129164.Google Scholar
Stolley, E., 1892. Die Kreide Schleswig-Holsteins. Mitteilungen aus dem Mineralogischen Institut Kiel 1: 191309.Google Scholar
Stolley, E., 1897. Über die Gliederung des norddeutschen und baltischen Senon sowie die dasselbe charakterisierenden Belemniten. Archiv für Anthropologie und Geologie Schleswig-Holsteins 2: 216302.Google Scholar
Vonhof, H.B., Jagt, J.W.M., Immenhauser, A., Smit, J., van den Berg, Y., Saher, M., Keutgen, N. & Reijmer, J.J.G., 2011. Belemnite-based strontium, carbon and oxygen isotope stratigraphy of the Maastrichtian stratotype area. In: Jagt, J.W.M., Jagt-Yazykova, E.A. & Schins, W.J.H. (eds): A tribute to the late Felder brothers – pioneers of Limburg geology and prehistoric archaeology. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 90: 259270.Google Scholar
Von Schlotheim, E.F., 1813. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. In: Leonhard, C.C. (ed.): Leonhard's Taschenbuch für die gesamte Mineralogie mit Hinsicht auf die neuesten Entdeckungen (1)7: 1134.Google Scholar
Von Schlotheim, E.F., 1820. Die Petrefakten-Kunde auf ihrem jetzigen Standpunkte durch die Beschreibung seiner Sammlung versteinerter und fossiler Überreste des Thier- und Planzenreichs der Vorwelt erläutert. Becker (Gotha): 1437.Google Scholar
Walaszczyk, I., Odin, G.S. & Dhondt, A.V., 2002. Inoceramids from the Upper Campanian and Lower Maastrichtian of the Tercis section (SW France), the Global Stratotype Section and Point for the Campanian-Maastrichtian boundary; taxonomy, biostratigraphy and correlation potential. Acta Geologica Polonica 52: 269305.Google Scholar
Weiss, W., 1999. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the marine Maastrichtian in northern Germany. In: The Maastrichtian. A celebratory conference. Maastricht, November 17-21, 1999. The 150th anniversary of the introduction of the Maastrichtian Stage. Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht (Maastricht), 1 pp.Google Scholar