Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:28:12.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The fluvial archive of the Middle and Lower Dnieper (a review)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

P.F. Gozhik
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 55B Gonchara Street, 01054, Kiev. Ukraine. e-mail: matoshko@iptelecom.net.ua
A.S. Ivchenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 55B Gonchara Street, 01054, Kiev. Ukraine. e-mail: ignnanu@geolog.freenet.kiev.ua

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information about the morphology and alluvial sediments of the Dnieper Valley is reviewed. The Dnieper Valley originated in the Late Miocene. The Middle Dnieper Valley is an intercontinental alluvial basin and the Lower Dnieper Valley is a shallow canyon that ends with a delta. Identification of the alluvial dynamic facies (channel, overbank, abandoned channel) is crucial for stratigraphical analysis. The dynamic facies form regular sequences - alluvial suites that combine into series. Individual suites and series are characterized by their mode of occurrence, facies composition, lithological features and expression in the modern landscape. Their stratigraphie position is established with reference to index beds and palaeontological, geochrono-logical and archaeological research, allowing them to be correlated along the valley. Correlation between different parts of the Dnieper system uses a combination of facies and geomorphological analyses, whereas correlation with other river systems makes use of mammalian and molluscan biostratigraphy. Global events (marine regressions and glaciations) that brought about similar reactions in different fluvial systems can be also used for correlation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2002

References

Balandin, Yu.G. & Arbuzova, L.S., 1984. Subaeral’nyi otlozheniya na poberezhii i shel’fe zapadnoy chasti Chornogo morya, ih geneticheskaya tipizaciya i korellyaciya. In: Alekseyev, A.A. et al., (eds): Vozrast i genezis pereuglubleniy na shel’fah i istoriya rechnyh dolin. Nauka (Moscow): 5159 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Bondarchuk, V.G. (Ed.), 1975. Stratygraphiya URSR. (Vol. 10). Neogen. Naukova dumka (Kyiv): 271 pp. (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Barshchevskiy, N.Eu., 1977. Stroeniye chetvertichnogo pokrova i istoriya chetvertichnogo osadkonakopleniya na territorii Kievskogo Prydneproviya. PhD thesis. Institute of Geological Sciences NAN of Ukraine (Kyiv): 161 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Dmitriev, N.I., 1936. Rel’ief USSR (geomorfologicheskiy ocherk). Izdatel’stvo Khar’kovskogo universyteta (Kharkiv): 250 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Dykan’, N.I., 1999. Ostrakody rodyn Cypridae ta Eucandonidae iz aluvial’nykh pleistotsenovykh vidkladiv Ukrainy. Dopovidi natsional’noi akademii nauk Ukrainy 1: 120127 (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Glushkov, B.V., 1985. Osobennosti stroyeniya Voronezhskoy flyuvioglyatsialnoy gryady. In: Krayevye obrazovaniya materikovykh oledeneniy. Nauka (Moscow): 120121 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goyzhevskiy, A.A. (Ed.), 1977. Geologicheskaya karta Ukrainskoy SSR i Moldavskoy SSR. Ministerstvo geologii USSR (Kyiv): 4 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Golubitskaya, A.A., 1973. Verchnemiotsen-pliotsenovy i belovezhsko-likhvinskiy alluvialnye kompleksy v basseyne r.Ros’. In: Bondarchuk, V.G. (ed.): O nizhney granitse chetvertichnogo perioda. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 7684 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goretskiy, G.I., 1966. Formirovaniye doliny r. Volgi v rannem i srednem antropogene. Allyuviy Pra-Volgi. Nauka (Moscow) : 412 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goretskiy, G.I., 1970. Allyuvialnaya letopis’ velikogo pra-Dnepra. Nauka (Moscow): 491 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gozhik, P.F., 1982. Stroenie i usloviya formirovaniya pozdnepleystotsenovogo allyuviya v nizovyakh rek Prichernomorya. In: Materialy po izucheniyu chetvertichnogo perioda na territorii Ukrainy. Naukova dumka (Kyiv): 132138 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gozhik, P.F., 1992. Presnovodnye mollusci i korrelyatsia verkhnekajnozojskikh allyuvialnykh otlozhenij yuga Vostochno-Yevropejskoj platformy. Doctor thesis. Institute of Geological Sciences NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv): 287 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gozhik, P.F., Lavrushyn, Yu.A. & Chuhunnyi, Yu.G., 1976. Glyatsiodislokatsii gory Pivikhi. Naukova dumka (Kyiv): 50 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gozhik, P.F., Chugunnyi, Yu.G. & Mel’nyk, V.I., 1976. Putevoditel’ VIII Mezhdunarodnogo simposiuma po lyessovym porodam. Naukova dumka (Kiev) : 71 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gozhik, P.F. & Kochubey, N.I., 1981. O vydelenii novogo stratigraphicheskogo gorizonta v verkhnem pleistotsene Prichernomorya. In: Stroyenie i voprosy korrelyatsii chetvertichnykh otlozheniy Ukrainy. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 125131 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gozhik, P.F. & Novosel’skiy, F.A., 1989. Geologicheskiye usloviya stroitelstva Dneprovsko-Bugskogo gidrouzla. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 120 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gubonina, Z.P., 1980. Palinologicheskaya kharakteristika podmorennykh otlozheniy v basseyne Dnepra (po dannym razreza Gun’ki). In: Vozrast i rasprosranenie maksimal’nogo oledeneniya Vostochnoy Evropy. Nauka (Moscow): 153168 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Isaenko, V.F., 1976. Neolit Pripyatskogo Polessiya. Nauka i tehnika (Minsk) : 128 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Ivanova, I.K., 1982. Iskopaemyi chelovek i yego kul’tura. In: Shantser, Ey.V. (ed.): Stratigraphiya SSSR. Chetvertichnaya sistema. Nauka (Moscow): 382412 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kenneth, J. & Jiovanoli, F., 1979. Messinian event in the Black Sea. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 29: 7593.Google Scholar
Kondufor, Yu.Yu. (ed.), 1982. Drevniy i srednevekovyi Kiev (Vol. 1). Naukova dumka (Kiev): 408 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lavrushyn, Yu.A., 1963. Allyuviu ravninnykh rek subarcticheskogo poyasa i periglyatsialnykh oblastey materikovykh oledeneniy. Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR (Moscow): 268 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lavrushyn, Yu.A. & Chuhunnyi, Yu.G., 1982. Kanevskiye glyatsiodislokatsii. Nauka (Moscow): 104 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lazarenko, A.A., 1964. Litologiya allyuviya ravninnyh rek gumidnoi zony (na primere Dnepra, Desny, Oki). Nauka (Moscow): 236 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lepikash, I.A., 1938. Gorishnio-pliotsenovi poklady v raioni Nokopolia-Zaporizhzhia. Zhurnal geologo-geographichnogo tsyklu vydavnytstva Ukrains’koii akademii nauk, 4(8): 127158 (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Makarenko, D.Yu. (ed.), 1987. Stratigraphicheskaya shema palaeogenovyh otlozheniy Ukrainy: (Unificirovannaya). Naukova dumka (Kiev): 114 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Markova, A.K., 1982. Pleystotsenovye gryzuny Russkoy ravniny (ikh znacheniye dlya palaeogeographii i stratigraphii). Nauka (Moscow): 183 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Matoshko, A.V., 1995. Tyrizaciya i raionirovaniye osadochnogo chehla Chernobyl’skoy zony otchuzhdeniya dlya gidrogeologicheskogo monitoringa. Problemy Chornobyl’s’koyi zony vidchuzhennya, 4: 95108 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Matoshko, A.V. & Chuhynnyi, Yu.G., 1993. Dneprovskoye oledeneniye territorii Ukrainy. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 191 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Matsui, V.M., Mos’kina, O.D. & Moskalenko, L.G., 1993. Novye dannye o stratigraphii pliotsena levoberezhya Srednego Dnepra. Doklady akademii nauk Ukrainy, 5: 100104 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Matviishina, Zh.N. & Vozgrin, B.D., 1991. Palaeogeographicheskiyi eskizy pozdnekainozoiskoy prirody basseina verhnyih techeniy rek Oster i Udai. In: Shnyukov, Eu.F. (Ed.): Litologiya osadochnogo chehla USSR (palaeogeographicheskiye aspecty), Naukova dumka (Kiev): 104110 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Mel’nyk, M.O., 1928. Pro naslidky poperednikh doslidiv chetvertynnykh pidmorennykh piskiv v raioni Kanivs’kykh dyslokatsii. Vicnyk Ukrains’koho viddilu geologichnoii komisii, 11: 107115 (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Miall, A.D., 1978. Fluvial sedimentology: An historical review. In: Miall, A.D. (Ed.): Fluvial Sedimentology. Canadian Soc. of Petrol. Geol. Memoir 5: 147.Google Scholar
Moliavko, G.I., 1960. Neogen pivdnya Ukrainy. Vudsvnytstvo akademii nauk Ukrains’koii RSR (Kyiv): 208 pp. (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Motuz, V.M., 1972. Nekotorye osobennosti stroeniya i veshchestvennogo sostava allyuviya raznovozrastnykh terras doliny Dnepra v predelakh BSSR. In: Voprosy geologii antropogena. Nedra (Moscow): 7085 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nazarenko, D.P., 1968. Geomorphologicheskaya karta i istoriya formirovaniya neogenovyh i antropogenovyh teras levoberezhiya USSR. Materialy Kharkovskogo otdela geographicheskogo obschestva Ukrainy, 6: 4451 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Pidoplichko, I.G., 1969. Pozdnepalaeoliticheskiye zhylishcha iz kostey mamonta. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 163 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rekovets, L.I., 1994. Melkiye mlekopitayushchiye antropogena yuga Vostochnoy Yevropy. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 371 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Reading, H.G., 1986. Sedimentary Environments and Facies. 2nd Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications (Oxford): 616 pp.Google Scholar
Shantser, Ye.V., 1961. Alluviy ravninnyh rek umerennogo poyasa i yego znacheniye dlya poznaniya zakonomernostey stroeniya i formirovaniya alluvial’n’h svit. Trudy GIN AN SSSR, seriya gelogiya, vypusk 135, 55: 274 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Semenenko, V.N., 1992. Denudatsionnye neogenovye poverkhnosti Prichernomorskoi vpadiny i Ukrainskogo shchita. Doklady akademii nauk Ukrainy, 11: 108111 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sobolev, D.N., 1938. O neogenovykh i chetvertychnykh terrasakh Ukrainy. Sovetskaya Geologiya, 6: 2432 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Svistun, V.l. & Lomayev, A.A., 1967. O geologicheskom vozraste iskopayemykh kostey mlekopitayushchikh iz rayona Kanevskoy GES. Vestnik zoologii, 3: 7780 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Veklich, M.F., 1968. Stratigraphiya lyessovoy formatsii Ukrainy i sosednikh stran. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 238 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Veklich, M.F. & Dubniak, V.O., 1975. Palaeogeografichni etapy utvorennia teras Seredniogo Dnipra. In: Problemy geographichnoi nauky v URSR. Naukova dumka (Kyiv): 7486.Google Scholar
Veklich, M.F. & Sirenko, N.O., 1976. Pliotsen i pleistosen levoberezhya Nizhnego Dnepra i ravninnogo Kryma. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 185 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Volkov, N.G. & Sokolovskiy, I.L., 1976. Osnovnye problemy geomorphologie levoberezhya srednego Dnepra. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 135 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vorona, V.A., 1969. Verkhnepliotsenovye ozyerno-allyuvialnye otlozheniya levoberezhya Srednego Prydneprovya. In: Materialy po chetvertichnomu periodu Ukrainy. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 100113 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Yes’kov, B.G., 1977. Inzhenerno-geologicheskiye svoystva allyuviya Srednego Dnepra. Naukova dumka (Kiev): 196 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Yes’kov, B.G., 1983. Sostav i svoystva rechnykh peskov v kososloistykh seriyakh. Institut geologicheskikh nauk (Kiev): 52 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zamoriy, P.K., 1961. Chetvertynni vidklady Ukrains’koii RSR. Vudvnytstvo kyivs’kogo universytetu (Kyiv): 549 pp. (in Ukrainian).Google Scholar