Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:30:24.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fracture networks in Rotliegend gas reservoirs of the Dutch offshore: implications for reservoir behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

B.D.M. Gauthier ,
R.C.W.M. Franssen  and
S. Drei
B.D.M. Gauthier*
Affiliation:
Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., B.U. Offshore P.O. Box 23, 1950 AA VELSEN NOORD, the Netherlands
R.C.W.M. Franssen*
Affiliation:
Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., B.U. Offshore P.O. Box 23, 1950 AA VELSEN NOORD, the Netherlands
S. Drei
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
*
2Present address: TOTAL Exploration Production - Direction Développement Production, Tour TOTAL, 24 Cours Michelet, 92069 PARIS LA DEFENSE, France
3Present address: Shell Deepwater Development Inc. (SDDI), One Shell Plaza, P.O. Box 60833, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70160-0833, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fracture systems of Rotliegend gas fields in and at the margins of the northern Broad Fourteens Basin in the Dutch offshore are described in terms of orientation, frequency, origin and type, and in relation to larger-scale structures. First, fracture data collected from core and image logs have been corrected to account for the bias related to the 1-D sampling. Second, these results were integrated with data on fracture cements and diagenesis in order to assess the timing of the fracture network development.

On the basis of their regional extent three phases of fracturing and four orientation trends can be distinguished in the basin:

  • (1) at Triassic times and related to early diagenesis and burial, NW-SE to NNW-SSE and NE-SW to ESE-WNW particulate-shear fractures developed;

  • (2) during the Mid-Kimmerian and related to the main burial stage, shear-related and dilational-shear-fault-related fracturing occurred parallel with larger-scale faults;

  • (3) during the Cretaceous and related to uplift, NW-SE and NE-SW joints propagated; a regional joint system developed outside the Jurassic rift basin, preferentially oriented E-W to ESE-WNW; these joints have not been dated accurately.

The fault-related shear fractures tend to compartmentalise the reservoirs, whereas the regional joints tend to enhance reservoir flow properties. These fracture systems are thought to play a negative or positive role, respectively, but only in fields with poor reservoir quality. Consequently, in such cases small-scale fractures should be taken into account in field development planning.

Keywords

Broad Fourteens Basingas reservoirsprediction methodsRotliegend
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 45 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2000

References

Antonellini, M.A. & Aydin, A., 1994. Effect of faulting on fluid flow in porous sandstones: petrophysical properties. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 78: 355–377.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, I.D., Peters, J.M. & Powell, C.M., 1993. Regional structural evolution of the North Sea: oblique slip and the reactivation of basement lineaments. In: Parker, J.R. (ed.): Proceedings 4th Conference on Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe. Geological Society (London): 1109–1122.Google Scholar
Bergerat, F., Bouroz-Weil, C. & Angelier, J., 1992. Paleostresses inferred from macrofractures, Colorado Plateau, Western USA. Tectonophysics 206: 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diday, E., 1971. Une nouvelle méthode en classification automatique de formes: la méthode des nuées dynamiques. Revue de Statistique Appliqué 21(2): 19–33.Google Scholar
Engelder, T., 1985. Loading path to joint propagation during a tectonic cycle: an example from the Appalachien Plateau, USA. Journal of Structural Geology 7: 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelder, T. & Geiser, P., 1980. On the use of regional joint sets as trajectories of paleostress field during the development of the Appalachian Plateau, New York. Journal of Geophysical Research 85: 6319–6341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franssen, R.C.M.W., Brim, J.F., Sleeswijk Visser, T.J. & Beecham, A., 1993. Fracture characterization and diagenesis in the Clipper Field, Sole Pit Basin, southern North Sea. In: 1993 American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition (The Hague) Abstracts: 48.Google Scholar
Frikken, H.W., 1996. CBIL logs: vital for evaluating disappointing well and reservoir performance, K15-FG field, central offshore Netherlands. In: Rondeel, H.E., Batjes, D.A.J. & Nieuwenhuijs, W.H. (eds.): Geology of gas and oil under the Netherlands. Kluwer (Dordrecht): 103–114.Google Scholar
Fulljames, J.R., Zijerveld, L.J.J., Franssen, R.C.M.W., Ingram, G.M. & Richard, P.D., 1996. Fault seal processes: systematic analysis of fault seals over geological and production time scales. In: Hydrocarbon seals, importance for exploration and production - Proceedings of the Norwegian Petroleum Society Hydrocarbon Seals Conference (Trondheim), Petroleum Abstract: 641329.Google Scholar
Glennie, K.W., 1990. Lower - Permian Rotliegend. In: Glennie, K.W. (ed.): Introduction to the petroleum geology of the North Sea. Blackwell Scientific Publication: 120–152.Google Scholar
Hancock, P.L., 1985. Brittle micro tectonics: principles and practice. Journal of Structural Geology 7: 437–457.Google Scholar
Homann, H. & Gauthier, B.D.M., 1995. Sampling fracture parameters in Borehole Imaging Logs and cores: an integrated approach applied to the Dutch Offshore. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 79: 1222; Petroleum Abstract: 610695.Google Scholar
Huang, Q. & Angelier, J., 1989. Fracture spacing and its relation to bed thickness. Geological Magazine 104: 550–556.Google Scholar
Kulander, B.R., Dean, S.L. & Ward, W.J. Jr., 1990. Fractured core analysis - interpretation, logging and use of natural and induced fractures in core. In: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Methods in Exploration 8: 88 pp.Google Scholar
Kulatilake, P.H.S., 1988. State-of-the-art in stochastic joint geometry modelling key questions. In: Cundall, (ed.): Rock mechanics. Balkema (Rotterdam).Google Scholar
Kulatilake, P.H.S., Wu, T.H. & Wathugala, D.N., 1990. Probabilistic modelling of joint orientation. International Journal on Numerical Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 14: 325–350.Google Scholar
Ladeira, F.L. & Price, N.J., 1981. Relationship between fracture spacing and bed thickness. Journal of Structural Geology 3: 179–183.Google Scholar
Loosveld, R.J.H. & Franssen, R.C.M.W., 1992. Extensional vs. shear fractures: implications for reservoir characterisation. European Petroleum Conference (Cannes, 16–18 November) Proceedings 2, Paper SPE 25017: 65–66.Google Scholar
Mardia, K.V., 1972. Statistics of directional data. Academic Press (London): 357 pp.Google Scholar
Mulder, G., Busch, V.:.P., Reid, I., Sleeswijk Visser, T.J. & Van Heyst, B.G., 1992. Sole Pit: improving performance and increasing reserves by horizontal drilling. European Petroleum Conference (Cannes, 16–18 November) Proceedings 2, Paper SPE 25025: 83–94.Google Scholar
Narr, W. & Lerche, I., 1984. A method of estimating of subsurface fracture density in core. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 68: 637–648.Google Scholar
Narr, W. & Suppe, J., 1991. Joint spacing in sedimentary rocks. Journal of Structural Geology 13: 1037–1048.Google Scholar
Price, N.J. & Cosgrove, J.W., 1990. Analysis of geological structures. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge): 502 pp.Google Scholar
Priest, S.D. & Hudson, J.A., 1976. Discontinuity spacing in rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics, Mineral Science & Geomechics, Abstracts 13: 135–148.Google Scholar
Reches, Z., 1983. Faulting of rocks in three-dimensional strain field. II Theoretical analysis. Tectonophysics 95: 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rives, T., Razack, M., Petit, J.R & Rawnsley, K., 1992. Joint spacing periodicity: field data, analogue and numerical modelling. Journal of Structural Geology 14: 925–937.Google Scholar
Terzaghi, R.D., 1964. Source of error in joint surveys. Geotechnique 15: 287–304.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem Boogaert, H.A. & Kouwe, W.F.R., 1993. Stratigraphic nomenclature of the Netherlands, revision and update by RGD and NOGEPA. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem) 50.Google Scholar
Van Wijhe, D.H., 1987. Structural evolution of inverted basins in the Dutch offshore.Tectonophysics 137: 171–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G.S., 1966. The statistics of orientation data. Journal of Geology 74: 786–797.Google Scholar
Wride, V.C., 1995. Structural features and structural styles from the five Countries area of the North Sea Central Graben. First Break 13: 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H. & Pollard, D.D., 1995. An experimental study of the relationship between joint spacing and layer thickness. Journal of Structural Geology 17: 887–905.Google Scholar
Ziegler, P.A., 1982. Geological atlas of Western and Central Europe. Elsevier (Amsterdam): 130 pp.Google Scholar