Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:52:11.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mikulino (= Eemian) mammal faunas of the Russian Plain and Crimea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

A.K. Markova*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography RAS, Staromonetny 29, MOSCOW 109017, Russia; e-mail: nature@glas.spc.org

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the last decades a considerable amount of data on mammals from Mikulino (=Eemian) deposits of the central and southern parts of the Russian Plain has been produced. Mammuthus primigenius (the early type), Palaeoloxodon antiquus (the advanced form), Arvicola ex gr. terrestris, Eolagurus cf. luteus and Lagurus cf. lagurus characterize this period. The so-called ‘Shkurlatian mammal assemblage’ was distinguished on the basis of a number of Eemian faunas.

The age of the mammal localities was established by using various geological and palaeontological evidence, together with the results of palaeomagnetic studies and absolute dating. The evolutionary level of the diagnostic species allows correlations between localities from different parts of the Russian Plain that have varying taphonomical conditions. The mammal- and malacofauna of the Mikulino Interglacial can also be used as a basis for correlations between the Karangat marine strata of the Black Sea and the continental deposits (alluvial sediments of the second terrace of the Sudost’ River and the Salyn phase of the Mezin fossil pedocomplex (see Dodonov et al., this volume). Forest, forest-steppe and steppe zone landscapes have been reconstructed for the central and southern parts of the Russian Plain on the basis of the Eemian faunas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2000

References

Adamenko, O.M., Gol’bert, A.V., Osiniuk, V.A., Matviishina, Zh.A., Motok, V.E., Sirenko, N.A. & Chemiuk, A.V., 1996. Quaternary paleogeography, ecosystems of Lower and Middle Dniester. Fenix Press (Kiev): 200 pp.Google Scholar
Agadjanian, A.K. & Erbaeva, M.A., 1983. Late Cenozoic rodents and lagomorphes of the USSR territory [in Russian]. Nauka Press (Moscow): 187 pp.Google Scholar
Agadjanian, A.K. & Glushankova, N.I., 1986a. Pleistocene of Desna basin [in Russian]. Moscow State University (Moscow): 227 pp.Google Scholar
Agadjanian, A.K. & Glushankova, N.I., 1986b. Mikhailovka - the key Pleistocene section of Russian Plain [in Russian]. Moscow State University (Moscow): 163 pp.Google Scholar
Alexeeva, L.I., 1980. Peculiarities of mammals associations of the last interglacial at the Russian Plain [in Russian]. In: Mlekopitaiushchie Vostochnoi Evropy [Mammals of Eastern Europe]. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR 93: 6874.Google Scholar
David, A.I. & Lungu, A.N., 1972. Mammal remains from Karagash quarry [in Russian]. In: Pozvonochnye Neogena i Pleistocena Moldavii [Neogene and Pleistocene vertebrates of Moldavia]. Shtiintsa Press (Kishinev): 1924.Google Scholar
Dodonov, A.E., Trubikhin, V.M., Markova, A.K., Tchepalyga, A.L. & Konikov, E.G., 1998. Last interglacial in transregional aspect: continental loess-palaeosol successions and marine deposits from Central Asia to the Black Sea shore. In: Abstract volume of the INQUA-SEQS Symposium ‘The Eemian - local sequences, global perspectives’: 20.Google Scholar
Dodonov, A.E., Tchepalyga, A.L., Mikhailesku, C.D., Zhou, L.P., Markova, A.K., Trubikhin, V.M., Simakova, A.N. & Konikov, E.G., 2000. The last-interglacial records from central Asia to the Northern Black Sea shore: stratigraphy and correlation. In: Van Kolfschoten, Th. & Gibbard, P.L. (eds.): The Eemian - local sequences, global perspectives. Geologie en Mijnbouw / Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 79: 303311 (this issue).Google Scholar
Gaigalas, A. & Hutt, G., 1997. The OSL age of the lacustrine sand of Upper Pleistocene at the outcrop Netiesos. In: The Late Pleistocene in Eastern Europe: stratigraphy, palaeoenvironment and climate. Abstract volume and excursion guide of the INQUA-SEQS Symposium (Vilnius): 12.Google Scholar
Gaigalas, A. & Molod’kov, A., 1997. New ESR dates of the Butenai and Merkine interglacial deposits in the Neravai and Netiesos exposures. In: The Late Pleistocene in Eastern Europe: stratigraphy, palaeoenvironment and climate. Abstract volume and excursion guide of the INQUA-SEQS Symposium (Vilnius): 13.Google Scholar
Grichuk, V.P., 1989. The history of flora and vegetation of Russian Plain during Pleistocene [in Russian]. Nauka Press (Moscow): 182 pp.Google Scholar
Gurtovaya, E. E. & Faustova, M.A., 1977. About the Mikulino stage of alluvium deposition in Middle Desna-River basin (on the example of Posudichi section)[in Russian]. Izvestia AN SSSR, Seria Geographicheskaia 2: 6975.Google Scholar
Heinrich, W.-D., 1978. Zur biometrischen Erfassung eines Evolutionstrends bei Arvicola (Rodentia, Mammalia) aus dem Pleistozän Thüringens. Saugetierliche Mitteilungen 2: 321.Google Scholar
Kahlke, H.-D., 1975. Zur chronologischen Stellung der Travertine von Weimar. Eringsdorfer Abhandlungen Zentr. Geologisches Institut (Berlin) 23: 591596.Google Scholar
Kalinovski, P.F., 1981. About the first finds of Pleistocene rodents on the Litva territory [in Russian]. In: Geologicheskie issledovania Kainozoia Byelarussii [Geological studies of Cenozoic of Byelorussia]. Nauka iTekhnika Press (Minsk): 134139.Google Scholar
Kalinovski, P.F., 1983. Theriofauna of Late Pleistocene and Holocene of Belorussia [in Russian]. Nauka i Tekhnika Press (Minsk): 153 pp.Google Scholar
Kolosov, Yu.G., 1986. Akkai Musterian culture [in Russian]. Naukova Dumka Press (Kiev): 223 pp.Google Scholar
Kolosov, Yu.G., Stepanchuk, V.N. & Chabai, V.P. 1993. Early Palaeolithic of Crimea [in Russian]. Naukova Dumka Press (Kiev): 222 pp.Google Scholar
Markova, A.K., 1975. The fossil rodents from the Mezin pedocomplex [in Russian]. Izvestia Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seria Geograficheskaya 5: 8288.Google Scholar
Markova, A.K., 1986. The morphological features of teeth Arvicola, Lagurus, Eolagurus & Micromi (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from the Mikulino localities of Russian Plain [in Russian]. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR 149: 7497.Google Scholar
Markova, A.K., 1992. The Pleistocene small mammals of Eastern Europe [in Russian]. In: Velichko, A. & Shik, S. (eds.): Stratigraphy and paleogeography of the Quaternary of Eastern Europe. Institute of Geography RAS (Moscow): 5094.Google Scholar
Markova, A.K. & Mikhailesku, C.D., 1990. The new locality of mammal and mollusc fauna in Mikulino deposits of Lower Danube basin [in Russian]. Bulleten’ Komissii po izucheniu Chetvertichnogo perioda 59: 94101.Google Scholar
Motuzko, A.N., 1985. Anthropogene rodents of Belorussia and adjacent territories [in Russian]. In: Problemy Pleistocena. Nauka i Tekhnika Press (Minsk): 173188.Google Scholar
Nazarov, V.I., 1986. The new species of entomofauna of Mikulino Interglacial in Belorussia [in Belorussian]. In: Levkov, E.A. & Yakubovskaya, T.V., (eds.): Novye i maloizvestnye vidy iskopaemykh zhivotnykh i rastenii Belorussii. Nauka i Tekhnika Press (Minsk): 167171.Google Scholar
San’ko, A.F. & Motuzko, A.N., 1991. Molluscs and mammals from calcareous tuffs of Borisova Gora on Zapadnaya Dvina [in Russian]. Doklady Akademii Nauk Belarusskoi Socialisticheskoi Respubliki, Geologia 35: 10041008.Google Scholar
Shevyrev, L.T., Alexeeva, L.I., Spiridonova, E.A., Tikhomirov, S.V., Arslanov, X.A., Gei, N.A. & Antsyfirova, G.A., 1987. The experience of stratigraphic separation of Late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits of Kalach Highland [in Russian]. Bulleten’ Komissii po izucheniu Chetvertichnogo perioda 56: 4565.Google Scholar
Van der Meulen, A.L., 1973. Middle Pleistocene smaller Mammals from Monte Peglia (Orvieto, Italy) with special reference to the phytogeny of Microtus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia). Quaternaria 17: 144 pp.Google Scholar
Velichkevich, F.Yu., 1982. Pleistocene flora of glacial regions of East-European Plain [in Russian]. Nauka iTekhnika Press (Minsk): 208 pp.Google Scholar