Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:17:24.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reservoir modelling of heterolithic tidal deposits: sensitivity analysis of an object-based stochastic model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

C.R. Geel  and
M.E. Donselaar
C.R. Geel*
Affiliation:
Department of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands
M.E. Donselaar
Affiliation:
Department of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Present address: TNO Built Environment and Geosciences, Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands. Email: kees.geel@tno.nl

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Object-based stochastic modelling techniques are routinely employed to generate multiple realisations of the spatial distribution of sediment properties in settings where data density is insufficient to construct a unique deterministic facies architecture model. Challenge is to limit the wide range of possible outcomes of the stochastic model. Ideally, this is done by direct validation with the ‘real-world’ sediment distribution. In a reservoir setting this is impossible because of the limited data density in the wide-spaced wells. In this paper this uncertainty is overcome by using size, shape and facies distributions of tidal channel and tidal flat sand bodies in a highly data-constrained lithofacies architecture model as input for the object-based stochastic model. The lithofacies architecture model was constructed from a densely perforated (Cone Penetration Tests and cored boreholes) tidal estuarine succession of the Holocene Holland Tidal Basin in the Netherlands. The sensitivity of the stochastic model to the input parameters was analysed with the use of varying tidal channel width and thickness values and calculating the connected sand volume per well for the different scenarios. The results indicated that for a small well drainage radius the difference in drainable volumes between the narrowest and the widest channel scenarios is large, and that for a large well drainage radius the tidal channel width hardly influenced the drainable volume. The sensitivity analysis highlighted the importance of sand-dominated tidal flats in improving lateral connectivity.

Keywords

Object-based stochastic modellingsensitivity analysisheterolithic tidal deposits
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 403 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2007

References

Beets, D.J., De Groot, Th.A.M. & Davies, H.A., 2002 Holocene tidal back-barrier development at decelerating sea-level rise: a 5 millennia record, exposed in the western Netherlands. Sedimentary Geology 158: 117–144.Google Scholar
Beets, D.J., Roep, Th.B & Westerhoff, W.E., 1996. The Holocene Bergen Inlet: closing history and related barrier progradation. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst N.S. 57: 97–131.Google Scholar
Beets, D.J. & Van der Spek, A.J.F., 2000. The Holocene evolution of the barrier and the back-barrier basins of Belgium and the Netherlands as a function of late Weichselian morphology, relative sea-level rise and sediment supply. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 79: 3–16.Google Scholar
Brandsaeter, I., Wist, H.T., Naess, A., Lia, O., Arntzen, O.J., Ringrose, P.S., Martinius, A.W., & Lerdahl, T.R., 2001. Ranking of stochastic realizations of complex tidal reservoirs using streamline simulation criteria. Petroleum Geosciences 7: S53–S63.Google Scholar
Cleveringa, J. & Oost, A.P., 1999. The fractal geometry of tidal-channel systems in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Geologie en Mijnbouw 78: 21–30.Google Scholar
De Mulder, E.F.J. & Bosch, J.H.A., 1982. Holocene stratigraphy, radiocarbon datings and paleogeography of central and northern North-Holland (the Netherlands). Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 36: 113–160.Google Scholar
Donselaar, M.E., Dalman, R.A.F., Dreyer, T., Petersen, S.A., Thomassen, R.A.J. & Toxopeus, G., 2006. Reservoir Architecture Modeling of the Cook Formation, Oseberg Field, Offshore Norway: Integrated Analysis of Core, Well Log and Seismic Data. AAPG 2006 Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas, April 9–12, 2006.Google Scholar
Donselaar, M.E. & Geel, C.R., 2003. Reservoir architecture model for heterolithic tidal deposits. 65rd EAGE Conference & Technical Exhibition – Stavanger, Norway, 2 – 5 June 2003.Google Scholar
Donselaar, M.E. & Geel, C.R., 2007. Facies architecture of heterolithic tidal deposits: the Holocene Holland Tidal Basin. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 86/4: 389–402.Google Scholar
Dreyer, T., 1992. Significance of tidal cyclicity for modelling of reservoir heterogeneities in the lower Jurassic Tilje Formation, mid-Norwegian shelf. Norsk Geol. Tidsskrift 72: 159–170.Google Scholar
Dubrule, O., & Damsleth, E., 2001. Achievements and challenges in petroleum geostatistics. Petroleum Geosciences 7: S1–S7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, D. & Hatley, A., 2005. The changing face of reservoir modelling. First Break 23, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinius, A.W., Ringrose, P.S., Brostrøm, C., Elfenbein, C., Næss, A. & Ringås, J.E., 2005. Reservoir challenges of heterolithic tidal sandstone reservoirs in the Halten Terrace, mid-Norway. Petroleum Geoscience 11: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Spek, A.J.F., 1994. Large-scale evolution of Holocene tidal basins in the Netherlands. Published Doctorate thesis, Utrecht University, the Netherlands: 191 pp.Google Scholar
Weerts, H.J.T., Cleveringa, P., Ebbing, J.H.J., Lang, F.D. & Westerhoff, W.E., 2000. De lithografische indeling van Nederland. Formaties uit het Tertiair en kwartair. TN0-NITG rapport 00–95-A. TN0-NITG, Utrecht: 38 p.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, W.E., De Mulder, E.F.J. & De Gans, W., 1987. Toelichting bij de geologische kaart van Nederland 1:50.000: Blad Alkmaar West (19W) en Blad Alkmaar Oost (190). Rijks Geologische Dienst, Haarlem: 227 pp.Google Scholar
Wong, Th.E., 2007. Jurassic. In: Wong, Th.E., Batjes, D.A.J., De Jager, J. (eds), Geology of the Netherlands. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences: 107–125.Google Scholar