Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:04:54.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Block dense weighted networks with augmented degree correction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2022

Benjamin Leinwand Open the ORCID record for Benjamin Leinwand [Opens in a new window]  and
Vladas Pipiras Open the ORCID record for Vladas Pipiras [Opens in a new window]
Benjamin Leinwand
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA
Vladas Pipiras*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: pipiras@email.unc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dense networks with weighted connections often exhibit a community-like structure, where although most nodes are connected to each other, different patterns of edge weights may emerge depending on each node’s community membership. We propose a new framework for generating and estimating dense weighted networks with potentially different connectivity patterns across different communities. The proposed model relies on a particular class of functions which map individual node characteristics to the edges connecting those nodes, allowing for flexibility while requiring a small number of parameters relative to the number of edges. By leveraging the estimation techniques, we also develop a bootstrap methodology for generating new networks on the same set of vertices, which may be useful in circumstances where multiple data sets cannot be collected. Performance of these methods is analyzed in theory, simulations, and real data.

Keywords

dense networksweighted networksdegree corrected block modelbootstrapcommunity detection
Type
Research Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 301 - 321
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Action Editor: Fernando Vega-Redondo

†

The second author was supported in part by the NSF grant DMS-1712966.

References

Aicher, C., Jacobs, A. Z., & Clauset, A. (2013). Adapting the stochastic block model to edge-weighted networks. In ICML workshop on structured learning. Google Scholar
Aicher, C., Jacobs, A. Z., & Clauset, A. (2015). Learning latent block structure in weighted networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 3(2), 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, T. E. (2017). Network inference and community detection, based on covariance matrices, correlations, and test statistics from arbitrary distributions. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(18), 9150–9165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellec, P., Marrelec, G., & Benali, H. (2008). A bootstrap test to investigate changes in brain connectivity for functional MRI. Statistica Sinica, 1253.Google Scholar
Bellec, P., Rosa-Neto, P., Lyttelton, O. C., Benali, H., & Evans, A. C. (2010). Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fmri. Neuroimage, 51(3), 1126–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharyya, S., & Bickel, P. J. (2015). Subsampling bootstrap of count features of networks. The Annals of Statistics, 43(6), 2384–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Rudie, J., Bandrowski, A., & Van Horn, J., Bookheimer, S. (2012). The UCLA multimodal connectivity database: A web-based platform for brain connectivity matrix sharing and analysis. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 6, 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, S., & Onnela, J.-P. (2019). A bootstrap method for goodness of fit and model selection with a single observed network. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y., Gel, Y. R., Lyubchich, V., & Nezafati, K. (2018). Snowboot: Bootstrap methods for network inference. R Journal, 10(2).Google Scholar
Chernoff, H., & Savage, I. R. (1958). Asymptotic normality and efficiency of certain nonparametric test statistics. In The annals of mathematical statistics (pp. 972–994).Google Scholar
Desmarais, B. A., & Cranmer, S. J. (2012a). Statistical inference for valued-edge networks: The generalized exponential random graph model. Plos One, 7(1), e30136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desmarais, B. A., & Cranmer, S. J. (2012b). Statistical mechanics of networks: estimation and uncertainty. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391(4), 1865–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, X., Xu, R. Y. D., & Cao, L. (2016). Copula mixed-membership stochastic blockmodel. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI’16 (pp. 1462–1468). AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Fosdick, B. K., & Hoff, P. D. (2015). Testing and modeling dependencies between a network and nodal attributes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(511), 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, C., Ma, Z., Zhang, A. Y., & Zhou, H. H. (2018). Community detection in degree-corrected block models. The Annals of Statistics, 46(5), 2153–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2022). Bootstrapping exchangeable random graphs. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 16(1), 1058–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrer, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2011). Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 83(1), 1981.Google ScholarPubMed
Krivitsky, P. N., Handcock, M. S., & Morris, M. (2011). Adjusting for network size and composition effects in exponential-family random graph models. Statistical Methodology, 8(4), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S., Spezzano, F., Subrahmanian, V. S., & Faloutsos, C. (2016). Edge weight prediction in weighted signed networks. In 2016 IEEE 16th international conference on data mining (ICDM) (pp. 221–230). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinwand, B., & Pipiras, V. (2022). Supplemental technical appendix to “block dense weighted networks with augmented degree correction”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinwand, B., Wu, G., & Pipiras, V. (2020). Characterizing frequency-selective network vulnerability for alzheimer’s disease by identifying critical harmonic patterns. In 2020 IEEE 17th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, K., & Levina, E. (2019). Bootstrapping networks with latent space structure. arxiv preprint arxiv: 1907.10821.Google Scholar
Li, T., Levina, E., & Zhu, J. (2020). Network cross-validation by edge sampling. Biometrika, 107(2), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunde, R., & Sarkar, P. (2019). Subsampling sparse graphons under minimal assumptions. arxiv preprint arxiv: 1907.12528.Google Scholar
Noroozi, M., Rimal, R., & Pensky, M. (2021). Estimation and clustering in popularity adjusted block model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 83(2), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peixoto, T. P. (2018). Nonparametric weighted stochastic block models. PhysicalReview E, 97(1), 012306.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmid, C. S., & Desmarais, B. A. (2017). Exponential random graph models with big networks: maximum pseudolikelihood estimation and the parametric bootstrap. In 2017 IEEE international conference on big data (Big Data) (pp. 116–121). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2017). A block model for node popularity in networks with community structure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 80(2), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spyrou, L., & Escudero, J. (2018). Weighted network estimation by the use of topological graph metrics. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 6(3), 576–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, B., & Xia, Y. (2016). Link prediction in weighted networks: A weighted mutual information model. Plos One, 11(2), e0148265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material 1

Download Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material(File)
File 2.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material 2

Download Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material(File)
File 146 Bytes
Supplementary material: File

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material 3

Download Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material(File)
File 89.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material

Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material 4

Download Leinwand and Pipiras supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 9.5 MB