Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:35:35.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and class: The Turkish Business Environment in the Neoliberal age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Ayşe Buğra  and
Osman Savaşkan
Ayşe Buğra
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Ataturk Institute for Modern Turkish History and Social Policy Forum, 34342, Bebek, İstanbul, bugray@boun.edu.tr
Osman Savaşkan
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Ataturk Institute for Modern Turkish History and Social Policy Forum, 34342, Bebek, İstanbul, osman.savaskan@boun.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the contemporary Turkish business environment as shaped by the economic, political and cultural transformations of the past 30 years. The changes in the forms and mechanisms of government intervention in the economy, the spatial relocation of industry, the rise of “Anatolian capital,” and the cleavages within the business community generated by the increasing salience of Islam in society and politics are some of the interrelated themes that will be pursued in the article. To understand the current context and the configurations of interest in the business community it is necessary to have a closer look at the manifestations of politics in business life. Political factors are important at the level of government-business relations where the political authority continues to mobilize a series of legislative and administrative mechanisms for the privileged treatment of those businesspeople with the right political and sectarian affiliations. Politics also enters the business environment through the role played by different business associations. These associations not only represent the interests of different segments of the business community, but they also shape the ways in which economic interests are defined, presented in policy terms and pursued through different strategies. In this context, the article also draws attention to the political cleavages that are manifested at the local level where they are managed and kept under control with different degrees of success.

Keywords

Government-business relationspolitical Islamneoliberalismspatial relocation of industryvoluntary business organizations
Type
Dossier on Urban Classes and Politics in the Neoliberal Era: Turkey in Comparison
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 46 , Spring 2012 , pp. 27 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Websites:

Cengiz Croup Web Page. Accessed March 4, 2012. http://www.cengizgroup.com.tr.Google Scholar
Çalık Holding Web Page. Accessed March 5, 2012. http://www.calik.com.Google Scholar
Boydak Holding Web Page. Accessed March 1, 2012. http://www.boydak.com.Google Scholar
Doğuş Grubu Web Page. Accessed February 4, 2012. http://www.dogusgrubu.com.tr/Google Scholar
IÇ Holding Web Page. Accessed March 5, 2012. http://www.icholding.com.tr.Google Scholar
MEDICALPARK Web Page. Accessed March 6, 2012. http.Y/www.medicalpark.com.tr.Google Scholar
özelleştirme idaresi Başkanlığı. Accessed February 3, 2012. http://www.oib.gov.tr/program/uygulamalar/yillara_gore.htm.Google Scholar
SANKO Web Page. Accessed March 1, 2012. http://www.sanko.com.tr.Google Scholar
Sembol inşaat Web Page. Accessed March 4, 2012. http://www.sembolinsaat.com.tr.Google Scholar
TCTV Web Page. “Türkiye Gönüllü Teşekküller Vakfı.” Accessed March 1, 2012. http://www.tgtv.org.Google Scholar
TOKI Web Page. Accessed February 3, 2012. http://www.toki.gov.tr/.Google Scholar
TUSKON Web Page. Accessed February 3, 2012. http://tuskon.org/.Google Scholar
TÜRKONFED Web Page. “Türk Girişim ve Iş Dünyası Konfederasyonu (TÜRKONFED) Tarihçe’si.” Accessed March 1, 2012. http://www.turkonfed.org/tarihce.htm.Google Scholar

Laws and regulations:

“4628 Sayılı Elektrik Piyasası Kanunu.” Official Gazzette, no. 24335, March 3, 2001.Google Scholar
“4646 Sayılı Doğalgaz Piyasası Kanunu.” Official Gazette no. 24390, May 2, 2001.Google Scholar
“4734 Sayılı Kamu ihale Kanunu.” Official Gazette, no. 24648, January 22, 2002.Google Scholar
“5174 Sayılı Türkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birliği ile Odalar ve Borsalar Kanunu.” Official Gazette, no. 25479, June 1, 2004.Google Scholar
“5216 Sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanunu.” Official Gazette, no. 25531, 23 July 2004.Google Scholar
“5273 Sayılı Arsa Ofisi Kanunu ve Toplu Konut Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılması ile Arsa Ofisi Genel Müdürlüğü’nün Kaldırılması Hakkında Kanun.” Official Gazette, no. 25671, December 15, 2004.Google Scholar
“5367 Sayılı Doğal Gaz Piyasası Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun.” Officiai Gazzette no. 25856, June 25, 2005.Google Scholar
“5393 Sayılı Belediye Kanunu.” Official Gazette no. 25874, July 13, 2005.Google Scholar
“5398 Sayılı Özelleştirme Uygulamalarının Düzenlenmesine ve Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanunda ve Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun.” Official Gazzette, no. 25882, July 21, 2005.Google Scholar
“5784 Sayılı Elektrik Piyasası Kanunu ve Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun.” Official Gazzette, no. 26948, July 26, 2008.Google Scholar
“5910 Sayılı Türkiye ihracatçılar Meclisi ve ihracatçı Birliklerinin Kuruluş ve Görevleri Hakkındaki Kanun.” Official Gazette, no. 27277, July 3, 2009.Google Scholar
“Özel Hastaneler Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik.” Official Gazette, no. 27166, March 11, 2009.Google Scholar

Media news, periodicals and other documents:

Habertürk, June 29, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürriyet, February 6, 2006; August 14, 2008Google Scholar
Milliyet, July 25, 2007; August 15, 2007; August 8, 2008; September 26, 2008; December 31, 2009; January 19, 2012; February 27, 2012.Google Scholar
Radikal, April 23, 2008; April 22, 2009; October 31, 2009.Google Scholar
Referans, February 9, 2009.Google Scholar
Vatan, April 25, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, March 5, 2007; May 25, 2007.Google Scholar
“Akın Ipek: Gülen ile Gönül Bağım Var.” Vatan, July 3, 2008.Google Scholar
“Bakan Arkada, Çalık Önde, Imza Masada.” Milliyet, October 20, 2009.Google Scholar
“Bardakoğlu Gitti.” Milliyet, November 11, 2010.Google Scholar
“Bertaraf Yok Edilmek Demek, TÜSIAD Bitaraf Değil.” Milliyet, August 18, 2010.Google Scholar
“Bomonti ihalesini Aldı, Arap Yatırımcılar Peşinde.” Milliyet, October 23, 2006.Google Scholar
“Cihan Kamer’in Gündemi Yoğun.” Milliyet, December 18, 2007.Google Scholar
“Cihan Kamer: Ben Şucu Bucu Değilim, Sadece Bir Parti Lideriyle Dostum.” Vatan, July 5, 2009.Google Scholar
“Çeçen, AES ile Enerji Sektöründe de iddialı.” Radikal, May 26, 2007.Google Scholar
“Erdoğan’dan TÜSIAD’a Eleştiri: Böyle Saçmalık Olur Mu?” Zaman, June 25, 2010.Google Scholar
“Eroğlu: 3 Devlet Kaypaklık Yaptı, Kredi Türkiye’den.” Milliyet, December 31, 2009.Google Scholar
“Ethem Sancak: idolüm Tayyip Erdoğan, Ona Sevdalıyım.” Zaman, October 5, 2008.Google Scholar
“Erdoğan’dan TÜSIAD’a: iktidarla Kedi Köpek Gibi Oynama Devri Bitti.” Zaman, August 18, 2010.Google Scholar
“Fettah Tamince: Fethullah Gülen’in Liderliğine inanıyorum.” Milliyet, September 2, 2005.Google Scholar
“Gazda Kamer Tartışması.” Milliyet, December 4, 2005.Google Scholar
“Hayatımız Kağıt Dedi Bugün Gazetesi’ni Aldı.” Hürriyet, November 16, 2005.Google Scholar
“Ihsu Barajı’na Kredi Bulundu.” Milliyet, February 12, 2010.Google Scholar
“Ihalelerin En Gözde Firması.” Milliyet, March 7, 2007.Google Scholar
“ISKI ihalelerinde Al Gülüm Ver Gülüm.” Vatan, March 7, 2007.Google Scholar
“Iş Dünyasında Gülen’li Örgütlenme.” Milliyet, March 21, 2006.Google Scholar
“Italyan ENl’yi Çalık’a Hükümet Yönlendirdi.” Milliyet, February 8, 2006.Google Scholar
“Kanun Değişti, Cihan Kamer’in Önü Açıldı.” Vatan, February 12, 2005.Google Scholar
“Kanaltürk El Değiştirdi!” Milliyet, May 12, 2008.Google Scholar
“KDV Kalktı, 36 Gün Sonra Şirket Kuruldu.” Milliyet, February 14, 2009.Google Scholar
“MÜSIAD’ı Tasfiye Operasyonu.” Hürriyet, November 7,1998.Google Scholar
“MÜSIAD'ın Yerine ASKON.” Radikal, November 7, 1998.Google Scholar
“Nahit Kiler: İstanbul’a 8.Tepeyi Yaptık, Turistler Terasa Koşacak.” Milliyet, August 12, 2009.Google Scholar
“Rızanur Meral: TUSKON Rol Çalmıyor, Boşlukları Dolduruyor.” Ekonomist, May 8–14, 2011.Google Scholar
“Sevinç: Satış Yasaya Aykırı.” Milliyet, February 23, 2008.Google Scholar
“Roña Yırcalı: Yurt Dışı Seyahatlerinde Çok Başlılık Var, Birlik Görüntüsü Şart.” Referans, March 29, 2010.Google Scholar
“Son Dönemin Yükseleni Muhafazakar Dernekler.” Milliyet, August 1, 2009.Google Scholar
“Star Gazetesi ve Kanal 24’e Ortak Oldu.” Vatan, May 19, 2009.Google Scholar
“TOKI’den 10 ihale Aldı, Artık Su Tesisi Yapacak.” Milliyet, May 12, 2007.Google Scholar
“TIM Yasası Iş Dünyasını Böldü.” Referans, June 11, 2009.Google Scholar
“Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Is Turkey Turning?” Economist, June, 2010.Google Scholar
“Ulusalcı Kanaltürk Muhafazakar Koza’da.” Milliyet, May 13, 2008.Google Scholar
“Ülkelerimiz Arasındaki Köprüleri Türk Okulları Kurdu.” Aksiyon, no. 757 (2009).Google Scholar
Kahraman, Hasan Bülent. “Anadolu-İstanbul Meydan Muharebesi.” Sabah, September 15, 2008.Google Scholar
Kara, Mehmet. “Akın Ipek: Gündemdeki Medya Patronu.” CNBC-E Business Turkey, January, 2010, 56–57.Google Scholar
Laçiner, Ömer. “Evet’in Tarih Öncesi.” Radikal Iki, September 5, 2010.Google Scholar
Münir, Metin. “Ilısu Ilerlememe Raporu.” Milliyet, June 16, 2006.Google Scholar
Münir, Metin. “Ilısu’da Üçüncü Perde.” Milliyet, July 31, 2009.Google Scholar
Münir, Metin. “Ilısu’da Yeni Bir Dönemece Doğru.” Milliyet, May 22, 2009.Google Scholar
Münir, Metin. “Kreditörlere Yalan Söylendi.” Milliyet, August 21, 2009.Google Scholar
“Seydişehir Alüminyum’u Başbakan’ın Hemşehrisi Aldı.” Milliyet, June 18, 2005.Google Scholar
Subaşı, Çiğdem Yücesoy. “10 Yılda Devleşenler.” CNBCE Business Turkey, April, 2010, 30–32.Google Scholar
Túzün, Hale. “Bitlisli Bakkal Amcanın Sermayesi ile Kurulan Kiler, Artık Büyük Oyuncularla Yarışıyor.” Radikal, September 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Serpil. Milliyet, March 16, 2008.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Serpil. “Çalık'ın Özkaynağı Tamince Mi?” Milliyet April 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Serpil. “Medyada ‘Sabah-ATV, Zaman-STV” Grubu.” Milliyet December 11, 2007.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Serpil. “Sabah-ATV Satışında Sorular Bitmiyor.” Milliyet February 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Serpil. “Sabah ihalesi Oldu, Yeni RTÜK Yasası Meclise Verildi.” Milliyet, January 13, 2008.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, Serpil. “Sözleşmeler Gizli de Ihale Açık Mı?” Milliyet December 11, 2005.Google Scholar

Books and articles:

“ASKON Ekonomi Raporu.” İstanbul: ASKON, 2009.Google Scholar
“Dış Ticaret Istatistikleri (1996–011).” Ankara: DIE-TÜIK.Google Scholar
“Türkiye imalat Sanayi istatistikleri (1983–2000).” Ankara: DIE.Google Scholar
Amin, Ash, ed. Post-Fordism: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ataöv, Anlı, and Ayda, Eraydın. “Different Forms of Governance: Responses of Two Metropolitan Regions in Turkey to State Restructuring.” Urban Affairs Review 47, no. 1 (2011): 84–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyas, izak. “Recent Privatization Experience of Turkey: A Reappraisal.” In Turkey and the Global Economy: Neo-Liberal Restructuring and Integration in the Post-Crisis Era, edited by Ziya, öniş and Fikret, Şenses. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Bayırbağ, Mustafa Kemal. “Local Entrepreneurialism and State Re-Scaling in Turkey.” Urban Studies 47, no. 2 (2010): 84–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil, Jamie, Peck, and Theodore, Nik. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs 10, no. 2 (2010): 182–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Class, Culture and State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations.” The International Journal of Middle East Studies 30, no. 4 (1998): 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “Political Islam in Turkey in Historical Context: Strengths and Weaknesses.” In The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideolog and State in Turkey, edited by Neşecan Balkan and Sungur Savran, 107–145. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. Stote and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe, and Osman, Savaşkan. “Yerel Sanayi ve Bugünün Türkiye'sinde iş Dünyası.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 118 (2010): 92–123.Google Scholar
Casanova, Jose. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
Demiralp, Seda. “The Rise of Islamic Capital and the Decline of Islamic Radicalism in Turkey.” Comparative Politics 41, no. 3 (2009): 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlet, Planlama Teşkilatı. “2010 Yılı Yatırım Programı.” Ankara: DPT, 2009.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif. “Modernity in Question? Culture and Religion in the Age of Global Modernity.” Diaspora (2003): 147–168.Google Scholar
Doğanyiğit, Sadettin. Açıklamalı, Içtihatlı, Sorun Çözümlü Kamu ihale Kanunu. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi, 2009.Google Scholar
Dumenil, Gerard, and Dominique, Levy. “The Neoliberal (Counter-) Revolution.” In Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader, edited by Alfredo, Saad-Filho and Deborah, Johnston, 9–19. London: Pluto Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Eraydın, Ayda. “Sanayinin Anadolu’ya Yaygınlaşması ve Son Dönemde Gelişen Yeni Sanayi Odakları.” In 75 Yılda Çarklardan Chip'lere, edited by Oya Baydar, 257–278. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 1999.Google Scholar
European Commission. “Turkey 2010 Progress Report.” Brussels: EU, 2011.Google Scholar
Filiztekin, Alpay, and insan, Tunalı. “Anatolian Tigers: Are They for Real?” New Perspectives on Turkey, no. 20 (1998): 77–106.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemma of Justice in ‘Post-Socialist’ Age.” New Left Review, no. 212 (1995): 68–94.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S., and Ateş, Altınordu. “After Secularization?” Annual Review of Sociology, no. 34 (2008): 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gümüşçü, Şebnem şçü, Şebnem. “Class, Status and the Party: The Changing Face of Political Islam in Turkey and Egypt.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 7 (2010): 835–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Secularism’s Crisis of Faith: Notes on a Post-Secular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly 25, no. 4 (2008): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, William, and Ergun, Özbudun. Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and David, Soskice, eds. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancke, Bob, ed. Debating Varieties of Capitalism: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Brief History ofNeoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh, and McClay, Wilfred M., eds. Religion Returns to Public Square: Faith and Policy in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahraman, Hasan Bülent, and Recep, Yener (interview). Turk Sağı ve AKP. İstanbul: Agora, 2007.Google Scholar
Köse, Ahmet Haşim, and Ahmet, öncü. “Dünya ve Türkiye Ekonomisinde Anadolu imalat Sanayii: Zenginleşmenin mi Yoksa Yoksullaşmanın mı Eşiğindeyiz?” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 77 (1998): 135–158.Google Scholar
Lash, Scott, and John, Urry. The End of Organized Capitalism. Madison, Wl: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Leon, Cedric De, Manali, Desai, and Cihan, Tuğal. “Political Articulation: Parties and the Constitution of Cleavages in the United States, India, and Turkey.” Sociological Theory 27, no. 3 (2009): 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Daniel H. “Religion and Politics in Comparative and Historical Perspective.” Comparative Politics 19, no. 1 (1986): 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müsiad, iş.Hayatında Islam insanı (Homo islamicus). İstanbul: MÜSIAD, 1994.Google Scholar
MÜSIAD, iş.Türkiye Ekonomisi Raporu 2008. İstanbul: MÜSIAD, 2008.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C. and Whitehead, Laurence, eds. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, V0l.4: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. “Globalization and Party Transformation: Turkey’s Justice and Development Party in Perspective.” In Globalizing Democracy: Party Politics in Emerging Democracies, edited by Burnell, Peter. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya, and Umut, Türem. “Entrepreneurs, Democracy and Citizenship in Turkey.” Comparative Politics 34, no. 3 (2002): 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pamuk, Şevket. “Globalization, Industrialization and Changing Politics in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey, no. 38 (1998): 267–273.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha, and Andrew, Davison. “Secularism and Laicism in Turkey.” In Secularisms, edited by Jakobsen, Janet R. and Pellegrini, Ann, 58–75. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, Michael J., and Sabel, Charles F.The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001 [1944].Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. “Putting the Political Back into the Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in yet Again.” World Politics 61, no. 3 (2009): 516–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. “Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America.” Journal of Latin American Studies 41, no. 3 (2009): 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. “Romancing the Market, Reviling the State: Historicizing Liberalism, Privatization, and the Competing Claims to Civil Society.” In Citizenship, Markets and the State, edited by Crouch, Colin, Eder, Klaus and Tambini, Damián, 23–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. “E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism.” In The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Cranovetter, Mark and Swedberg, Richard, 419–455. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview, 2011.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. “The Study of Organized Interests: Before ‘the Century’ and After.” In The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Confici, edited by Colin, Crouch and Streeck, Wolfgang, 3–45. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen, Thelen. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Toprak, Binnaz, Irfan, Bozan, Nedim, Şener, and Tan, Morgui. Türkiye'de Farklı Olmak: Din ve Muhafazakarlık Ekseninde Ötekilestirilenler. İstanbul: Metis, 2010.Google Scholar
Tuğal, Cihan. Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türk, Tabipleri Birliği. “Seçimlerine Giderken Türkiye’de Sağlık.” Ankara: Türk Tabipleri Birliği, 2011.Google Scholar
Useem, Michael, The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the USA and UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S.Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1960.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. “Religious Involvement and Status-Bridging Social Capital.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41, no. 4 (2002): 669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan. “Introduction: The Role of the New Bourgeoisie in the Transformation of the Turkish Islamic Movement.” In The Emergency of a New Turkey: Democracy and AK Parti, edited by Yavuz, Hakan, 1–19. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan. Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar