Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:48:51.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Universalism Versus Particularism: Ottoman Historiography and the “Grand Narrative”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Haldun Gülalp*
Affiliation:
Hamilton College

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-El-Haj, , Rifa'at, . 1991. Formation of the Modem State: The Ottoman Empire Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Alavi, Hamza. 1972. “The State in Post-Colonial Societies: Pakistan and Bangladesh,” New Left Review, 74.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir. 1976. Unequal Development. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir. 1989. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Aricanlı, Tosun and Thomas, Mara. 1994. “Sidestepping Capitalism: On the Ottoman Road to Elsewhere,” Journal of Historical Sociology, 7(1).Google Scholar
Avcıoğlu, Doğan. 1969. Türkiye’nin Düzeni. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Bailey, Anne M. and Llobera, Josep R. (eds.). 1981. The Asiatic Mode of Production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lütfi. 1938. “Türkiye’de Toprak Meselesinin Tarihi Esasları,” in Barkan, Ö. L., Türkiye’de Toprak Meselesi. İstanbul: Gözlem Yayınları. 1980.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lütfi. 1956. “Türkiye’de ‘Servaj’ Var mıydı?” in Barkan, Ö.L., Türkiye’de Toprak Meselesi. İstanbul: Gözlem Yayınları, 1980.Google Scholar
Berktay, Halil. 1987. “The Feudalism Debate: The Turkish End —Is ‘Tax-vs.-Rent’ Necessarily the Product and Sign of a Modal Difference?Journal of Peasant Studies, 14(3).Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. 1961. Feudal Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1972. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cin, Halil. 1985. Osmanlı Toprak Düzeni ve Bu Düzenin Bozulması. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth F.H. 1980. The State Tradition in Western Europe. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Foran, John. 1988. “The Modes of Production Approach to Seventeenth-Century Iran,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 20(3).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gran, Peter. 1980. “Political Economy as a Paradigm for the Study of Islamic History,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 11(4).Google Scholar
Gülalp, Haldun. 1994. “Capitalism and the Modern Nation-State: Rethinking the Creation of the Turkish Republic,” Journal of Historical Sociology, 7(2).Google Scholar
Gülalp, Haldun. 1996. “State and Class in Capitalism: Marx and Weber on Modernity,” Current Perspectives in Social Theory. Vol. 16, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hourani, Albert. 1981. The Emergence of the Modern Middle East. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İslamoğlu, Huri and Keyder, Çağlar. 1977. “Agenda for Ottoman History,” Review, 1(1).Google Scholar
Karal, Enver Ziya. 1981. “The Principles of Kemalism” in Özbudun, E. and Kazancigil, A. (eds.), Atatürk: Founder of a Modern State. London: C. Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal. 1974. “The Stages of Ottoman History,” in Karpat, Kemal, The Ottoman State and Its Place in World History. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Roger. 1986. The State in Modern Society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1973. “A Political Theory of Property” in Macpherson, C. B., Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1859. “Preface,” A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1971.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1894. Capital, vol. 3, New York: International Publishers, 1976.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick. 1974. On Colonialism. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
McGowan, Bruce. 1981. Economic Life in Ottoman Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Ortaylı, İlber. 1987. İmparatorluğun En Uzun Yüzyılı. 2nd ed., İstanbul: Hil Yayınları.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State. London: Hutchinson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Gyan. 1990. “Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives from Indian Historiography,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32(2).Google Scholar
Rosenau, Pauline Marie. 1992. Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigar, Michael E. and Levy, Madeleine R.. 1977. Law and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S.. 1974. “Islam and Ottoman Decline” in Turner, B.S., Weber and Islam: A Critical Study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Ed. by G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris. 1985. “The Uniqueness of the East,” Journal of Peasant Studies, 12(2/3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar