Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:53:08.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alevist Movements at Home and Abroad: Mobilization Spaces and Disjunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Elise Massicard
Elise Massicard*
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/CERAPS, Lille, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Alevist movement developed almost simultaneously in Turkey and among Turkish migrants, but it is structured and acts quite differently in these distinct, albeit related, political spaces. This comparative empirical study tries to explain the differences in the discourses and the success of Alevist movements in Turkey and Germany by relating them to the broader institutional and discursive contexts within which they are embedded. Alevist movements are incorporated differently in state policies directed to claim-makers and consequently possess different discursive and institutional resources. Spatially bounded institutional contexts and political agendas frame the discourse and strategies of Alevist claim-making, and result in divergent developments. It is thus necessary to disentangle the multiple levels of claim-and policy-making involved (local, national and supranational), and to analyze their relationships and possible articulations. ‘Transnational’ mobilization has often been understood as a mere continuation of mobilization at home or, oppositely, as its driving force. This paper questions the continuity between mobilizations at home and abroad, and argues that mobilization in migration entails specific dynamics, which may not be re-imported home.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 29: Special Issue: Forty Years of Turkish Migration to Germany , Spring-Fall 2003 , pp. 163 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AABF. 2002. Lehrplanentwurf für den alevitischen Religionsunterricht. Cologne.Google Scholar
Amiraux, Valérie. 2001. Acteurs de l'islam entre Allemagne et Turquie, Parcours militants et expériences religieuses. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Baumann, Gerd. 1998. “Body Politics or Bodies of Culture?”, Cultural Dynamics 10(3), pp. 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, Robert D. 1987. Framing Activity, Meaning, and Social Movement Participation: The Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Austin: University of Texas, Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., Snow, David A., 2000. “Framing processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp. 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozarslan, Hamit. 1994. “Au-delà de l'abolition du Khalifat. Laïcité, Etat-Nation et contestation kurde”, Les annales de l'autre islam, 2, pp. 225–235.Google Scholar
Çağlar, Ayşe. 1998. “Popular Culture, Marginality and İnstitutional İncorporation. German-Turkish Rap and Turkish Pop in Berlin”, Cultural Dynamics, 10(3), pp. 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coşkun, Zeki. 1995. Aleviler, Sünniler ve… öteki Sivas, Istanbul: Iletişim.Google Scholar
Erman, Tahire and Göker, Emrah, 2000. “Alevi Politics in Contemporary Turkey”, Middle Eastern Studies, 36(4) October, pp. 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2000. 2000 Regular Report from the Commission on the Progress Turkey's Progress towards Accession, Brussels.Google Scholar
FUAF. 2000. Les objectifs de la fédération des unions des alévis en France. Paris.Google Scholar
Gamson, William and Meyer, David S., 1996. “The Framing of Political Opportunity”, in McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., Zald, Mayer N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1982. “The rediscovery of ideology: return to the repressed in media studies”. In Gurevitch, M., Benett, T., Curon, J., Woolacott, J., Culture, Society and the Media. New York: Methuen, pp. 56–90.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Heitmeyer (ed.). 1997. Verlockender Fundamentalismus: türkische Jugendliche in Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kaya, Ayhan. 1998. “Multicultural Clientelism and Alevi Resurgence in the Turkish Diaspora: Berlin Alevis”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 18, Spring, pp. 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehl-Bodrogi, Krisztina. 2001. “Alevis in Germany on the Way to Public Recognition?”, ISIM Newsletter, 8, p. 9.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies”, British Journal of Political Science, 16, pp. 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Paul, Statham, 2000. “Challenging the liberal Nation-State? Postnationalism, Multiculturalism, and the Collective Claims-Making of Migrants and Ethnic Minorities in Britain and Germany”, in Koopmans, Ruud, Statham, Paul (eds.), Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics, Comparative European Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 189-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Ruth. 1990. “Shifting centres and emergent identities: Turkey and Germany in the lives of Turkish Gastarbeiter”, in Dale, Eickelman, James, Piscatori (eds.) Muslim Travellers. Pilgrimage, Migration, and the Religious İmagination. London: Routledge, pp. 153–171.Google Scholar
Massicard, Elise. 2002. Construction identitaire, mobilisation et territorialité politique. Le mouvement aléviste en Turquie et en Allemagne depuis la fin des années 1980. Unpublished PhD thesis, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris.Google Scholar
Massicard, Elise. 2003. “Alevism as a Productive Misunderstanding: the Hacıbektaş Festival”, in Jongerden, Joost, White, Paul (eds.), Turkey's Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview. Leiden: Brill, pp. 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Oberverwaltungsgericht. 1998. Urteil OVG7B 4.98/VG 3A 2196.93, Berlin.Google Scholar
Özdil, A.-Ö. 1999. Aktuelle Debatten zum Islamunterricht in Deutschland. Hambourg: E.B.-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ryan, C. 1991. Prime Time Activism. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Schüler, Harald. 1998. Die türkischen Parteien und ihre Mitglieder. Hambourg: Deutsches Orient-Institut.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. 2000. “Religion or Culture? Concepts of Identity in the Alevi Diaspora”, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. 2001. “Contesting the Nation in Diaspora: Alevis in Germany and a Media Discourse”, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. 2002. “Alevi Dedes in the German diaspora: The transformation of a religious institution”, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 127, pp. 163–186.Google Scholar
Väth, Gerhard. 1993. “Zur Diskussion über das Alevitum”, Zeitschrift für Türkei-Studien 6(2), pp. 211–222.Google Scholar
Vertovec, Steve. 1996. “Berlin Multikulti: Germany, ‘Foreigners' and World-openness’”, New Community 22(3), July, pp. 381–399.Google Scholar
Vorhoff, Karin. 1995. Glaube, Zwischen, Nation und neuer Gemeinschaft: alevitische Identität in der Türkei der Gegenwart. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz.Google Scholar
Zentrum für Türkeistudien. 1997. Medienkonsum der türkischen Bevölkerung in Deutschkand und Deutschlandbild im türkischen Fernsehen. Essen: Zentrum für Türkeistudien.Google Scholar