Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:32:22.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Becoming The “Other” as a Muslim in Turkey: Turkish Women vs. Islamist Women1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Ayşe Saktanber
Ayşe Saktanber*
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University, Department of Sociology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The covering of women has become the mark of Islam's new visibility in urban Turkey since the 1980s. Women wearing long, loose overcoats and headscarves tightly framing their faces and covering their necks and bosoms are now a familiar part of the urban scene, as well as of university campuses. They are usually referred to as İslamci (Islamist) women, sometimes also as dinci (religionist), gerici (regressive), irticacı (reactionary), kara peçeli (black veiled) or türbanlı (turbaned). Thus in the lexicon of Turkish identity, these women constitute a group defined through oppositional terms, similar to such ephitets as “leftist” women and “femininist” women. The words “Kemalist” and/or “Atatürkist” women have concurrently gained new political significance in denoting women (often professional elites) who, as against the so-called Islamist women, proclaim their allegience to Atatürk and his principles, i.e. speak from a pro-western, pro-state, secular-nationalistic and gender egalitarian position.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 11 , fall 1994 , pp. 99 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper is a revised version of a paper written under the same title in a much more extensive form than the present one. I would like to express my thanlcs to Aycan Eren, Çağlar Iceyder and Ayşe Öncü who read the first version of this paper and made valuable criticisms. I feel especially indebted to Ayşe Öncü for the scholarly effort she put into shortening this paper without omitting any points of its core argument.

References

Ahmed, L. 1992. Women and Gender in Islam. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Arkoun, M. 1994. “Islam Tarihinde Yöntem Sorunu”, trans. by Erdem, C. and Aktay, Y., Tezkire, no.6, Kiş, pp. 49-70.Google Scholar
Aswad, B. C. 1979. “Women, Class, and Power: Examples from the Hatay, Turkey”, in Keddie, N. and Beck, L. (eds.), Women in the Muslim World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ayata, S. 1988. “Statü Yarιşmasι ve Salon Kullanimi”, Toplum ve Bilim, no. 42, Yaz. pp.5-25.Google Scholar
Ayata, S. 1993. “The Rise of Islamic Fundamentalism and Its Institutional Framework”, in Eralp, A., Tünay, M. and Yeşilada, B. (eds.), The Political and Socioeconomic Transformation of Turkey. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Berktay, F. 1990. “Türkiye Solu'nun Kadin Bakιşι: Değişen Bir Şey Var mi?”, in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Kadin Bakιş Açisindan 1980'ler Türkiye'sinde Kadιnlar. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Bolak, H. 1990. “Aile İci Kadin Erkek İlişkilerinin Çok Boyutlu Kavramlaştιrιlmasina Yönelik Öneriler” in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Kadin Bakιş Açιsιndan 1980'ler Türkiye'sinde Kadιnlar. İstanbul: İletişim. Google Scholar
Bordieu, P. 1989. Distinction, trans, by. Nice, R., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, V. 1992. Hermes’ Dilemma and Hamlet's Desire. Cambridge, Massachussettes: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Criss, N.B. 1993. “A Facet of Muslim Womanhood: The Turkish Case”, Turkish Review of Middle East Studies, Annual 7, Istanbul: ISIS.Google Scholar
Çakιr, R. 1994. Ne S¸riat Ne Demokrasi: Refah Partisini Anlamak. İstanbul: Metis Yaymlari.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans, by Rendall, S. F., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Demirtepe, Ü. 1992. Frak'tan T-Shirťe. İstanbul: Yilmaz Yaymlari.Google Scholar
Eickelman, D. F. 1991. “Traditional Islamic Learning and Ideas of the Person in the Twentieth Century”, in Kramer, M. (ed.). Middle Eastern Lives. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. 1992. Social Theory and Psychoanalysis in Transition: Self and Society from Freud to Kristeva. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emerson, C. and M., Holquist. 1986. M. M. Bakhtin Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. by McGee, V. W., Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, J. L. 1991. Islam the Straight Path. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. “Nietzsche, Geneology, History” in Bouchard, D.F. (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. trans. by Bouchard, D.F. and Simon, S., Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gardener, M. 1992. The Dialogics of Critique: M.M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Göle, N. 1991. Modern Mahrem. Istanbul: Metis Yaymlari. Google Scholar
Günes-Ayata, A. 1990. “Türkiye'de Kadmin Siyasete Katιhmι” in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Kadin Bakιş Açιsmdan 1980'ler Türkiye'sinde Kadιnlar. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Günes-Ayata, A. 1990. “Pluralism Versus Authoritarianism: Political Ideas in Two Islamic Publications”, in. Tapper, R.L. (ed.), Islam in Modern Turkey. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Haddad, Y. and Smith, J.I.. 1982. “Eve: Islamic Image of Woman”, Women's Studies International Forum 5, no.2.Google Scholar
Izutsu, T. 1966. Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Quran. Montreal: McGill University Press.Google Scholar
İlyasoğlu, A. 1994. Örtülü Kimlik. İstanbul: Metis Yaymlari.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. 1982. “Urban Change and Women's Roles in Turkey: an Overview and Evaluation”, in Kağιtçιbaşι, Ç. (ed.), Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lazreg, M. 1988. “Feminism and Difference: The Perils of Writing as a Woman on Women in Algeria”, Feminist Studies, 14(1), Spring, pp. 81-107. Google Scholar
Mardin, Ş. 1977. “Religion in Modern Turkey”, International Social Science Journal, 29(2), pp. 279-97. Google Scholar
Mardin, Ş. 1989. Religion and Social Change in Modern Turkey: The Case of Bediiüzzaman Said Nursi. Albany: SUNY Press. Google Scholar
Nader, L. 1989. Orientalism, Occidentalism and the Control of Women. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseneau, P.M. 1992. Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Saktanber, A. 1990. “Türkiye'de Medyada Kadin: Serbest, Müsait Kadin veya İyi Eş, Fedakar Anne”, in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Kadin Bakιş Açisindan 1980'ler Türkiye'sinde Kadinlar. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Saktanber, A. 1991. “Women's Role in the Making of an Islamic Way of Life m Urban Turkey”, paper presented in the symposium: “New Voices in Turkish Women's Studies”, Middle East Center, University of Pennsylvania, April 27, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Saktanber, A. 1992. “Women's Identity in the Revitalization of Islam in Urban Turkey: The Convergence of Modernity and Islamic Way of Life”, unpublished paper presented to the Center for Studies of Islamic Societies and Civilizations, Washington University in St. Louis, April 29, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Saktanber, A. 1994. “Formation of a Middle Class Ethos and Its Quotidian: Revitalising Islam in Urban Turkey”, paper presented in the workshop: “Local Cultures in the Global City”, organized by the Orient Institute of Istanbul in cooperation with the Department of Sociology of the Bosphorus University and the History Foundation of Turkey, April 29-30, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Schick, E. C. 1990. “Representing Middle Eastern Women: Feminism and Colonial Discourse”, Feminist Studies, 16(2), Summer, pp. 345-80.Google Scholar
Sirman, N. 1989a. “Feminism in Turkey: A Short History”, New Perspectives On Turkey, 3(1), Fall, pp.1-34.Google Scholar
Sirman, N. 1990a. “Köy Kadminmin Aile ve Evlilikte Güçlenme Mücadelesi”, in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Kadin Bakιş Açιsιndan 1980'ler Türkiye'sinde Kadinlar. Istanbul: Iletişim.Google Scholar
Sirman, N. 1990b. “State, Village and Gender in Western Turkey”, in Finkel, A. and Sirman, N. (eds.), Turkish State, Turkish Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, W. C. 1981. On Understanding Islam. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Tapper, N. 1990. “Ziyaret: Gender, Movement, and Exchange in a Turkish Community”, in Eickelman, D. and Piscatori, J. (eds.), Muslim Travellers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. 1992. Mikhail Bakhtin The Dialogical Principle. trans, by. Godzich, W., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Toprak, B. 1988. “The State, Politics, and Religion in Turkey”, in Heper, M. and Evin, A. (eds.), State, Democracy and the Military: Turkey in the 1980s. Berlin: de Guyter.Google Scholar
Toprak, B. 1990. “Religion as State Ideology in a Secular Setting: the Turkish-Islamic Synthesis”, in Wagstaff, M. (ed.), Aspects of Religion in Secular Turkey. Durham Center of Middle East and Islamic Studies.Google Scholar
T.R. Prime Ministry, Undersecreteriat For Women's Affairs and Social Services, Directotate General on the Status and Problems of Women. 1993. The Report Prepared in Accordance with Article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Publication No. 80.Google Scholar
T.R. State Ministry for Women's Affairs and Social Services. 1994. The Status of Women in Turkey, The Turkish National Report to the Fourth World Conference on Women 1995.Google Scholar
T.R. State Ministry for Women's Affairs and Social Services, Directorate General on the Status and Problems of Women. 1994. “Commission Report on Lack of Awareness of, and Commitment to, Internationally and Nationally Recognized Women's Rights”, prepared for the Turkish National Report to the Fourth World Conference on Women 1995.Google Scholar
Zubaida, S. 1994. İslam, Halk ve Devlet. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar