Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:26:23.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business Relations into/from Gendered Social Relations: Exchange in the Transnational Suitcase Trade Market of Laleli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Deniz Yükseker
Deniz Yükseker*
Affiliation:
Sociology Department, The Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the past decade there has been a resurgence of studies in the social sciences that emphasize the role of “the social” in market exchange and economic development. This is a welcome change from the “asocial” homo economicus of neoclassical theory and finds various expressions, most notable among them being studies on social capital, trust, and networks. Simplified, the argument is that men and women do not enter into economic transactions in a social vacuum; rather, their community ties, their face-to-face relations, and their networks of such relations facilitate gainful exchange and may ultimately contribute to successful economic development in a country or region.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 27 , Fall 2002 , pp. 77 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrighi, Giovanni. 1986. “Custom and Innovation: Long Waves and Stages of Capitalist Development” in Di Matteo, M.et al. (Eds.), Technological and Social Factors in Long Term Fluctuations, Proceedings, Siena, Italy, December 1986. New York and Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. 2001. “The New Economic Sociology and its Double Silence on Capitalism and Braudel,” Review, 24(1), pp. 107–123.Google Scholar
Attwood, Lynne. 1996. “The Post-Soviet Women in the Move to the Market: A Return to Domesticity and Dependence?” in Marsh, Rosalind (Ed.), Women in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, pp. 255–266.Google Scholar
Baker, Wayne E. 1990. “Market Networks and Corporate Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), pp. 589–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blacher, Philippe. 1996. “Les ‘Shop-Turisty’ de Tsargrad ou les Nouveaux Russophones d'Istanbul,” Turcica, 28, pp. 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacich, Edna. 1973. “A Theory of Middleman Minorities,” American Sociological Review, 38, pp. 583-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacich, Edna and Modell, J.. 1981. The Economic Basis of Ethnic Solidarity: A Study of Japanese Americans. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital,” in Richardson, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1982. The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism 15th-18th Century Vol. 2, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bridger, Sue, et al. 1996. No More Heroines? Russia, Women and the Market. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruno, Marta. 1997. “Women and the Culture of Entrepreneurship,” in Buckley, Mary (Ed.), Post-Soviet Women: From the Baltic to Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1988. “The Stability of American Markets,” American Journal of Sociology, 94(2), pp. 356–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology (supplement), 94, pp. 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Philip D. 1984. Cross-Cultural Trade in World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIE (State Institute of Statistics). 1997. Yearbook of Foreign Trade. Ankara: DIE.Google Scholar
DPT (State Planning Organization). 2002. http://www.dpt.gov.trGoogle Scholar
Fine, Ben. 1999. “The Developmental State is Dead-Long Live Social Capital?” Development and Change, 30, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flıgstein, Neil. 2001 The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-first-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York and London: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1963. Peddlers and Princes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1990. “The Old and New Economic Sociology: A History and an Agenda,” in Friedland, Roger and Robertson, A.F., (Eds.), Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal. 1985. Ottoman Population 1830-1914. Demographic and Social Characteristics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kolankiewicz, George. 1996. “Social Capital and Social Change,” British Journal of Sociology, 47(3) September, pp. 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippner, Greta. 2001. “The Elusive Market: Embeddedness and the Paradigm of Economic Sociology,” Theory and Society, 30(6), pp. 774–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena. 1996/1997. “Blat Exchange: Between Gift and Commodity,” Cambridge Anthropology, 19(3), pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Light, Ivan. 1972. Ethnic Enterprise in America. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Ivan and Gold, Steven J.. 2000. Ethnic Economies. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lotspeich, Richard. 1995. “Crime in the Transition Economies,” Europe-Asia Studies, 47(4), pp. 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Thomas. M. 1996. “Russian Democracy and Social Capital,” Social Science Information, 35(4), pp. 629–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD 1997. OECD Economic Surveys: Russian Federation 1997-1998. Paris: Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process,” in Polanyi, Karlet al. (Eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory. Glencoe: The Free Press, pp. 243–269.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1994. “The Informal Economy and its Paradoxes,” in Smelser, Neil J. and Swedberg, Richard (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 426–449.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Bach, Robert. 1985. Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Landolt, Patricia. 2000. “Social Capital: Promise and Pitfalls of its Role in Development,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 32, pp. 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Sensenbrenner, Julia. 1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Detei minants of Economic Action,” American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), pp. 1320–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (with Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Raffaella Y.). 1993a. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993b. “The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life,” The American Prospect, 13 Spring, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
Rzhanitsyna, Lyudmila. 1995. “Women's Attitudes Toward Economic Reforms and the Market Economy,” in Koval, Vitalina (Ed.), Women in Contemporary Russia. Providence: Berghahn Books, pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Gertrude. 1996. “Economic Transformation in the Post-Soviet Republics: An Overview,” in Kaminski, Bartłomiej (Ed.), Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Euroasia. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 11–41.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1983Ц934]. The Theory of Economie Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Trans. Opie, Redvers). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Shami, Seteney. 1998. “Circassion Encounters: The Self as Other and the Production of the Homeland in the North Caucasus,” Development and Change, 29(4), pp. 617–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, Claire. 1994. Thieves' World: The Threat of the New Global Network of Organized Crime. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect,” American Sociological Review, 61(4) August, pp. 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenal, H. Deniz. 2000. “Weaving a Market: The Informal Economy and Gender in a Transnational Trade Network between Turkey and the Former Soviet Union,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Binghamton University.Google Scholar
Yükseker, Deniz, (in press). Laleli-Moskova: Kayıtdışı Ticaret ve Cinsiyet İlişkileri, Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
Yükseker, Deniz, (forthcoming). “On the Embeddedness of Economic Action: Gendered Trading in a Transnational Marketplace in Istanbul,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Special Issue on Migration and the Subversion of Gender.Google Scholar
Zukin, Sharon and DiMaggio, Paul. 1990. “Introduction,” in Zukin, Sharon and DiMaggio, Paul (Eds.), Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar