Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:33:24.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Encounters and Gender Hierarchies in the Community of ‘Garipçe’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Güliz Erginsoy
Güliz Erginsoy*
Affiliation:
Mimar Sinan University, Department of Sociology, Istanbul, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Until recently, much of the discussion on globalization has been focused on trans- or supra-local forces at work, with relatively little attention paid to questions of locality—that is, people and groups situated in networks of social relations in a specific time and place. In most analyses, ‘the local’ was conceived in highly abstract and general terms, as the presumed site of reaction, resistance and opposition to the homogenizing forces of globalization. Today, mechanistic interpretations of globalization as an outside threat that engenders ‘local reactions’ has come under increasing criticism. The need to examine the specific socio-economic and cultural-ideological configurations, within which global flows are accommodated, in order to understand how people negotiate meaningful lives amidst changing power relations, has become apparent. The present study is an effort in this direction.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 18 , Spring 1998 , pp. 131 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadan-Unat, N. 1996. Kum Saatini İzlerken, Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1991. “Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,” in Featherstone, M. (ed.), Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalisation and Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
British Foreign Office Archives, Public Record Office, FO 371-12230 - E 3234/25744, London.Google Scholar
Keyder, Ç. and Öncü, A. 1993. “Istanbul Yol Ayrımında,” Istanbul, No. 7, pp. 28–35.Google Scholar
Long, N. 1984. “Creating Space for Change: A Perspective on the Sociology of Development,” inauguration speech, Wageningen Agricultural University. Condensed Version, Sociologia Ruralis, XXIV (3/4).Google Scholar
Long, N. 1989. “Encounters at the Interface: A Perspective on Social Discontinuities in Rural Development,” in Wageningen Studies in Sociology, No. 27. Wageningen: Wageningen University Press.Google Scholar
Long, N. and Long, A. 1992. Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, T. K. and Arce, A. 1993. “Constructing Quality: Globalisation, The State and Food Circuits,” Working Paper. No. 1. The University of Hull and Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place, Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Öncü, A. and Weyland, P. 1997. Space, Culture and Power: New Identities in Globalizing Cities. London and New Jersey: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Ploeg, J. van der. 1992. “The Reconstitution of Locality: Technology and Labour in Modern Agriculture,” in Marsden, T.K. (ed.), Labour and Locality: Critical Perspectives on Rural Change. Vol. 4. London: Fulton.Google Scholar
Sassen-Koob, S. 1984. “Notes on the Incorporation of the Third World Women into Wage Labor through Immigration and Offshore Production,” International Migration Review 18(4), pp. 1144–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklair, L. 1991. Sociology of the Global System. New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar