Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:51:23.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Istanbul between Civilization and Discontent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Asu Aksoy  and
Kevin Robins
Kevin Robins
Affiliation:
Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the context of economic globalisation and the new international order taking shape after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Istanbul is assuming a new and strategic prominence in the world. What kind of city is Istanbul likely to become in its next phase of existence? What can we say of the urban culture and of the sense of urbanity that are now developing there? There are those who maintain that the new Istanbul is again becoming a cosmopolitan city, a cultural mosaic. What strike us most forcefully are the forces that are working to inhibit and undermine any such ideal. First, we consider the contemporary transformation in urban form, and then we shall go on to explore the changing cultural identity of the city.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 10 , Spring 1994 , pp. 57 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrieux, G. 1988. “Musique: Alaturka ou Alafranga,” Autrement, Serie Monde, 29.Google Scholar
Bilici, F. 1993. “Sociabilité et Expression Politique Islamistes en Turquie: les Nouveaux Vakifs,” Revue Française de Science Politique, 43(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çakir, R. 1992. “La Mobilisation Islamique en Turquie,” Esprit, AugustGoogle Scholar
Çeçener, B. 1987. “İstanbul'u Beyrut Yapmak,” Ölçü, 1 January.Google Scholar
Çelik, Z. 1986. The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duthuit, C. 1992. “Nécropole Archéologique ou Grands Boulevards?,” Critique, 543-544.Google Scholar
Göle, N. 1993. “Istanbul's Revenge,” İstanbul (English Lang, ed.), 1(2).Google Scholar
Goytisolo, J. 1984. “Istanbul,” Les Temps Modernes, 456-457.Google Scholar
İzberk, M. 1993. “The Silhouette of the Historical Peninsula,” İstanbul (English Language edition), 1(2).Google Scholar
Karpat, K.H. 1976. The Gecekondu, Rural Migration and Urbanisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keyder, Ç. and Öncü, A. 1993. Istanbul and the Concept of World Cities. İstanbul: Friedrich Ebert Vakfi.Google Scholar
Kuban, D. 1993. “Istanbul's Roman-Byzantine Identity,” İstanbul (English Language edition), 1(1).Google Scholar
Leontidou, L. 1993. “Postmodernism and the City: Mediterranean Versions”, Urban Studies, 30(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansel, P. 1993. “Plans to Make Istanbul a Centre of Culture”, Financial Times, supplement on “Istanbul and the Olympics,” 24 June.Google Scholar
Öncü, A. 1993. “Understanding Istanbul,” İstanbul (English Language edition), 1 (2).Google Scholar
Özbeyoğlu, E. 1993. “The 1990 Zoning Plan,” İstanbul (English Language edition), 1(2).Google Scholar
Pope, N. 1993. “Le Retour des Islamistes Turcs,” Le Monde, 11 September.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. 1973. The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. 1992. “The Body and the City,” Times Literary Supplement, 18 September.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. 1992. The Arabesk Debate: Music and Musicians in Turkey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar