Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:35:07.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Place, food, and agriculture: the use of geographical indications in olive oil production in western Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2017

Derya Nizam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study concerns how olive oil producers and local bureaucrats in western Turkey use geographical indications (GIs) as a localist strategy to strengthen their position in global markets by challenging conventional agricultural practices. The study employs the disarticulation approach of global commodity chain analysis in order to understand which factors delink people and places from conventional commodity chains/industrial chains and link them instead to GI chains. The results of the study indicate that regional disadvantages—e.g., high production costs due to land characteristics—are the main factor delinking local actors from the conventional olive oil commodity chain. Furthermore, certain dynamic rent opportunities that are related to characteristics of territorial quality and to local cultural characteristics also contribute to the linking of the region and producers to GI chains.

Keywords

Agriculturefoodgeographical indicationglobal commodity chainsolive oil
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 57 , November 2017 , pp. 3 - 30
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Derya Nizam, Department of Sociology, İzmir University of Economics, 35330, Balçova, İzmir, Turkey, deryanizam@yahoo.com.

Author’s Note: I would like to thank the University of Sydney Postgraduate Research Support Scheme for funding the initial research for this article. I am also very grateful to the following people for their extremely helpful comments and criticism on earlier drafts of the materials: Salvatore Babones, Elisabeth Riedl, Jennifer Bair, Sarah Bowen, Ly Phan, Deniz Yükseker, Çağlar Keyder, and Zafer Yenal. I would also like to thank Michael D. Sheridan for his careful editing, and finally to convey my thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are, of course, my own.

References

Babcock, Bruce A. and Clemens, Roxanne. Geographical Indications and Property Rights: Protecting Value-added Agricultural Products. MATRIC Briefing Paper 04-MBP 7 (May 2004). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8b5d/ 76403235fd24d6aab776635a0c749190cf51.pdf.Google Scholar
Bair, Jennifer and Werner, Marion. “Commodity Chains and the Uneven Geographies of Global Capitalism: A Disarticulations Perspective.” Environment and Planning A 43, no. 5 (2011): 988–997.Google Scholar
Barham, Elizabeth. “Translating Terroir: The Global Challenge of French AOC Labeling.” Journal of Rural Studies 19, no. 1 (2003): 127–138.Google Scholar
Barlow, James. “A Note on Biotechnology and the Food Production Chain: Some Social and Spatial Implications of Changing Production Technology.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12, no. 2 (1988): 229–246.Google Scholar
Bowen, Sarah. “Embedding Local Places in Global Spaces: Geographical Indications as a Territorial Development Strategy.” Rural Sociology 75, no. 2 (2010): 209–243.Google Scholar
Bowen, Sarah and Zapata, Ana Valenzuela. “Geographical Indications, Terroir, and Socioeconomic and Ecological Sustainability: The Case of Tequila.” Journal of Rural Studies 25, no. 1 (2009): 108–119.Google Scholar
Bramley, Cerkia and Kirsten, Johann F.. “Exploring the Economic Rationale for Protecting Geographical Indicators in Agriculture.” Agrekon 46, no. 1 (2007): 69–93.Google Scholar
Buller, Henry and Morris, Carol. “Growing Goods: The Market, the State, and Sustainable Food Production.” Environment and Planning A 36, no. 6 (2004): 1065–1084.Google Scholar
Chayanov, Aleksandr Vasilevich. A.V. Chayanov on the Theory of Peasant Economy. Edited by Daniel Thorner, Basile Kerblay, and R.E.F. Smith. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
De Haan, Leo J. “Globalization, Localization and Sustainable Livelihood.” Sociologia Ruralis 40, no. 3 (2000): 339–365.Google Scholar
DuPuis, E. Melanie, and Goodman, David. “Should We Go ‘Home’ to Eat? Toward a Reflexive Politics of Localism.” Journal of Rural Studies 21, no. 3 (2005): 359–371.Google Scholar
Evans, Gail E. and Blakeney, Michael. “The Protection of Geographical Indications after Doha: Quo Vadis?” Journal of International Economic Law 9, no. 3 (2006): 575–614.Google Scholar
Friedland, William H. “Reprise on Commodity Systems Methodology.” International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 9 (2001): 82–103.Google Scholar
Friedland, William H., Barton, Amy E. and Thomas, Robert J.. Manufacturing Green Gold: Capital, Labor, and Technology in the Lettuce Industry: An Application of the Sociology of Agriculture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gade, Daniel W. “Tradition, Territory, and Terroir in French Viniculture: Cassis, France, and Appellation Contrôlée.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94, no. 4 (2004): 848–867.Google Scholar
Goodman, David, Sorj, Bernardo and Wilkinson, John. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-industrial Development. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Guthman, Julie. “Back to the Land: The Paradox of Organic Food Standards.” Environment and Planning A 36, no. 3 (2004): 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthman, Julie. “The Polanyian Way? Voluntary Food Labels as Neoliberal Governance.” Antipode 39, no. 3 (2007): 456–478.Google Scholar
Guthman, Julie. “Unveiling the Unveiling: Commodity Chains, Commodity Fetishism, and the ‘Value’ of Voluntary, Ethical Food Labels.” In Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research. Edited by Jennifer Bair. London: Stanford University Press, 2009. 190–206.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. “The Art of Rent: Globalization, Monopoly and the Commodification of Culture.” In A World of Contradictions: Socialist Register 2002. Edited by Leo Panitch and Colin Leys. London: Merlin Press, 2001. 93–110.Google Scholar
Henderson, Elizabeth. “Rebuilding Local Food Systems from the Grassroots Up.” Monthly Review: An Independent Socialist Magazine 50, no. 3 (1998): 112–124.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, Mary K. and Heffernan, William D.. “Opening Spaces through Relocalization: Locating Potential Resistance in the Weaknesses of the Global Food System.” Sociologia Ruralis 42, no. 4 (2002): 347–369.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, C. Clare. “Embeddedness and Local Food Systems: Notes on Two Types of Direct Agricultural Markets.” Journal of Rural Studies 16, no. 3 (2000): 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İslamoğlu, Huricihan, Gülöksüz, Elvan, Yücel Kaya, Alp, Çavdar, Ayşe, Karakoç, Ulaş, Nizam, Derya and Yazıcı, Göksun. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBITAK) Project No. 106K137. İstanbul, 2008. http://uvt.ulakbim.gov.tr/uvt/ index.php?cwid=9&vtadi=TPRJ&ano=101068_5f6d57e7a04db12f9011bb60c35073ee.Google Scholar
Ilbert, Hélène and Petit, Michel. “Are Geographical Indications a Valid Property Right? Global Trends and Challenges.” Development Policy Review 27, no. 5 (2009): 503–528.Google Scholar
International Olive Council. “World Olive Oil Figures 2016.” International Olive Council. http://www.internationaloliveoil.org/estaticos/view/131-world-olive-oil-figures.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar and Yenal, Zafer. “Agrarian Change under Globalization: Markets and Insecurity in Turkish Agriculture.” Journal of Agrarian Change 11, no. 1 (2011): 60–86.Google Scholar
Lowe, Philip and Ward, Neil. “Field-level Bureaucrats and the Making of New Moral Discourses in Agri-environmental Controversies.” In Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring. Edited by David Goodman and Michael J. Watts. London: Routledge, 1997. 256–272.Google Scholar
Mann, Susan A. and Dickinson, James M.. “Obstacles to the Development of Capitalist Agriculture.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 5, no. 4 (1978): 466–481.Google Scholar
Marsden, Terry, Banks, Jo and Bristow, Gillian. “Food Supply Chain Approaches: Exploring Their Role in Rural Development.” Sociologia Ruralis 40, no. 4 (2000): 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettepenningen, Evy, Vandermeulen, Valerie, Huylenbroeck, Guido Van, Schuermans, Nick, Hecke, Etienne Van, Messely, Lies, Dessein, Joost and Bourgeois, Marie. “Exploring Synergies between Place Branding and Agricultural Landscape Management as a Rural Development Practice.” Sociologia Ruralis 52, no. 4 (2012): 432–452.Google Scholar
Mutersbaugh, Tad. “Fighting Standards with Standards: Harmonization, Rents, and Social Accountability in Certified Agrofood Networks.” Environment and Planning A 37, no. 11 (2005): 2033–2051.Google Scholar
Nizam, Derya. “Coğrafi İşaretler ve Küresel Piyasada Yerelleşen Tarım Ürünleri.” Praksis 25 (2011): 87–116.Google Scholar
Nizam, Derya. “Place-Based Labels in Agricultural Value Chains.” Comparative Sociology 16, no. 3 (2017): 422–445.Google Scholar
Pacciani, Alessandro, Belletti, Giovanni, Marescotti, Andrea and Scaramuzzi, Silvia. “The Role of Typical Products in Fostering Rural Development and the Effects of Regulation (EEC) 2081/92.” Paper presented at the 73rd Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists. Ancona, June 28–30, 2001.Google Scholar
Rangnekar, Dwije. “Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni.” Environment and Planning A 43, no. 9 (2011): 2043–2059.Google Scholar
Suh, Jeongwook and MacPherson, Alan. “The Impact of Geographical Indication on the Revitalisation of a Regional Economy: A Case Study of ‘Boseong’ Green Tea.” Area 39, no. 4 (2007): 518–527.Google Scholar
T.C. Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı Kooperatifçilik Genel Müdürlüğü. “2014 Yılı Zeytin ve Zeytinyağı Raporu.” http://koop.gtb.gov.tr/data/53319ec1487c8eb1e43d72a1/2014%20Zeytinya%C4%9F%C4%B1%20Raporu.pdf.Google Scholar
Thiedig, Frank and Sylvander, Bertil. “Welcome to the Club? An Economical Approach to Geographical Indications in the European Union.” Agrarwirtschaft 49, no. 12 (2000): 428–437.Google Scholar
Ünsal, Artun. Ölmez Ağacın Peşinde. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2011.Google Scholar
Ulusal, Zeytin ve Zeytinyağı Konseyi (UZZK). “2013–2014 Sezonu Türkiye Zeytin ve Zeytinyağı Rekoltesi Tahmin Raporu.” http://itb.org.tr/dosya/rekolteraporu/20132014-sezonu-turkiye-rekolte-tahmin-raporu-4.pdf?v=1421220430845.Google Scholar
Van der, Ploeg, Douwe, Jan and Renting, Henk. “Impact and Potential: A Comparative Review of European Rural Development Practices.” Sociologia Ruralis 40, no. 4 (2000): 529–543.Google Scholar
Vivas-Eugui, David. “Negotiations on Geographical Indications in the TRIPs Council and Their Effect on the WTO Agricultural Negotiations.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 4, no. 5 (2001): 703–728.Google Scholar
Watts, Michael J. and Goodman, David. “Agrarian Questions, Global Appetite, Local Metabolism: Nature, Culture, and Industry in Fin-de-siècle Agro-food Systems.” In Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring. Edited by David Goodman and Michael J. Watts. London and New York: Routledge, 1997. 1–32.Google Scholar