Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:28:42.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering social movements in Turkey: The case of the 1968-71 protest cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Emin Alper
Emin Alper*
Affiliation:
İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, 34469 Maslak, İstanbul, alperemin@hotmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The years between 1968 and 1971 in Turkey were unprecedented in terms of rising social protests instigated by students, workers, peasants, teachers and white-collar workers. However, these social movements have received very limited scholarly attention, and the existing literature is marred by many flaws. The scarce literature has mainly provided an economic determinist framework for understanding the massive mobilizations of the period, by stressing the worsening economic conditions of the masses. However, these explanations cannot be verified by data. This article tries to provide an alternative, mainly political explanation for the protest cycle of 1968-71, relying on the “political process” model of social movement studies. It suggests that the change in the power balance of organized groups in politics, which was spearheaded by a prolonged elite conflict between the Kemalist bureaucracy and the political elite of the center-right, provided significant opportunities to under-represented groups to organize and raise their voices.

Keywords

social movementsTurkish political historystudent movementlabor movementprotest cycle
Type
Research Article
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 43 , Fall 2010 , pp. 63 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, Feroz. Demokrasi Sürecinde Türkiye, 1945-1980. İstanbul: Hil Yayınları, 1996.Google Scholar
Akşit, Bahattin. “Kırsal Dönüşüm ve Köy Araştırmaları (1960-1980).” In Türkiye'de Tarımsal Yapılar, edited by Toprak, Z. and Pamuk, Ş, 188-92. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1988.Google Scholar
Alper, Emin. “Bülent Ecevit.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Sol. İstanbul: ıletişim Yayınları, 2007.Google Scholar
Alper, Emin. “Student Movement in Turkey, from a Global Perspective, 1960-1971.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Boğaziçi University, 2009.Google Scholar
Altunya, N. “TÖS (Türkiye Öğretmenler Sendikası).” In Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi, 275-77.Google Scholar
Altunya, Niyazi. “TÖDMF (Türkiye Öğretmen Dernekleri Milli Federasyonu).” In Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi, 274-75. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Altunya, Niyazi. Türkiye'de Öğretmen Örgütlenmesi, 1908-1998. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Aslan, Filiz. “Grev.” In Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 1996.Google Scholar
Atılgan, Gökhan. Yön-Devrim Hareketi, İstanbul: TÜSTAV, 2002.Google Scholar
Avcıoğlu, Doğan. Türkiye'nin Düzeni, İstanbul: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1968.Google Scholar
Bali, Rıfat, ed. Turkish Students' Movements and the Turkish Left in the 1950's-1960's (US Diplomatic Documents on Turkey), İstanbul: The Isis Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cumhuriyet, various issues.Google Scholar
Davies, J. C.When Men Revolt and Why: A Reader in Political Violence and Revolution. Clencoe: Free Press, 1971.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, Donatella, and Rucht, Dieter. “Left Libertarian Movements in Context.” In The Politics of Social Protest, edited by Jenkins, J. Craig and Klandermans, Bert, 261-65. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Demirel, Tanel. “1946-1980 Döneminde ‘Sol’ ve ‘Sağ’.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Dönemler ve Zihniyetler, 419-37. İstanbul: ıletişim Yayınları, 2009.Google Scholar
Demirel, Tanel. Adalet Partisi: ıdeoloji ve Politika. İstanbul: ıletişim Yayınları, 2004.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Bülent. Bu Düzen Değişmelidir, İstanbul: Tekin Yayınevi, 1974 (1968).Google Scholar
Erdoğan, Necmi. “Demokratik Soldan Devrimci Yol'a: 1970'lerde Sol Popülizm Üzerine Notlar.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 78 (1998): 22–37.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, and Jasper, James M.. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” Sociological Forum 14, no. 1 (1999): 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, T. R.Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Güngör, Yasemin. “Tarım, Ormancılık, Avcılık ve Balıkçılık ışkolu.” In Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi, 149.Google Scholar
Gürel, Burak. “Kırda Sınıf Mücadeleleri.” Devrimci Marksizm 6-7 (2008).Google Scholar
Imran Öktem'e Armağan. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, 1970.Google Scholar
Işıklı, Alpaslan. “Ücretli Emek ve Sendikalaşma.” In Geçiş Sürecinde Türkiye, edited by Schick, İ.C. and Tonak, A.. İstanbul: Belge Yayınları, 1987.Google Scholar
Karadeniz, Harun. Olaylı Yıllar ve Gençlik, İstanbul: May Yayınları, 1979.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. Türkiye'de Devlet ve Sınıflar, İstanbul: ıletişim Yayınları, 1993.Google Scholar
Kılıç, Aykut. “Populism, Sources of Rural Domination and Resistance in Turkey in the 1970s.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Boğaziçi University, 2005.Google Scholar
Kocabaşoğlu, Uygur. “Amerikan Barış Gönüllüleri.” In Sosyalizm ve Toplumsal Mücadeleler Ansiklopedisi, 2034-35.Google Scholar
Koç, Yıldırım. Türkiye ışçi Sınıfı ve Sendikacılık Hareketi Tarihi, İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 2003.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, William. The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe: Free Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. “The Political Opportunity Structure of the Dutch Peace Movement.” West European Politics, no. 12 (1989): 296-97.Google Scholar
Maguire, Diarmuid. “Opposition Movements and Opposition Partners.” In The Politics of Social Protest, edited by Jenkins, J. Craig and Klandermans, Bert, 199–228. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Makal, Ahmet. Türkiye'de Çok Partili Dönemde Çalışma ılişkileri: 1946-1963. İstanbul: ımge Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Mater, Nadire. “Devrimci Gençlik Hareketi Üzerine Ertuğrul Kürkçü ıle Görüşme.” In Türkiye Sorunları Dizisi 2. İstanbul: Alan Yayınları, 1987.Google Scholar
Mater, Nadire. Sokak Güzeldir, İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2009.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer. “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes - toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American journal of Sociology 82, no. 6 (1977): 1212-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mıhçıoğlu, Cemal. Türkiye'de Kamu Personeli Sendikaları. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, 1968.Google Scholar
Milliyet, various issues.Google Scholar
Mülayim, Ziya Gökalp. Tarımda Düzen Değişikliği. Ankara: Ulusal Basımevi, 1970.Google Scholar
Nebioğlu, Kemal. “15-16 Haziran.” In Sosyalizm ve Toplumsal Mücadeleler Ansiklopedisi (STMA). İstanbul: ıletişim, 1988.Google Scholar
Neyzi, Leyla. “Object or Subject? The Paradox of “Youth” in Turkey.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 33, no. 3 (2001): 411-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, R., and Pamuk, Ş.. A History of Middle East Economies in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Özsever, Atilla. “15-16 Haziran.” In Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Öztürk, S., and Arınır, T., “işçi Sınıfı-Sendikalar ve 15/16 Haziran.” İstanbul: Sorun Yayınları, 1976.Google Scholar
Pekin, Faruk. “DİSK.” In Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi, 307-10. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Smelser, N. J.Theory of Collective Behaviour. London: Routledge, 1962.Google Scholar
Sülker, Kemal. Türkiye'yi Sarsan 2 Uzun Gün. İstanbul: Yazko, 1980.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy (1965-1975). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sydney. “Paradigm Warriors: Regress and Progress in the Study of Contentious Politics.” Sociological Forum 14, no. 1 (1999): 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taşkın, Yüksel. “From Left Populism to Conservative Republicanism: Left Kemalists’ Regression from Modernist Optimism.” New Perspectives on Turkey, no. 37 (2007): 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tercüman, various issues.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McCrow Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. “Wise Quacks.” Sociological Forum 14, no. 1 (1999): 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ünsal, Artun. Umuttan Yalnızlığa: Türkiye İşçi Partisi 1961-1971. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 2002.Google Scholar
Zileli, Gün. Yarılma (1954-1972). İstanbul: ıletişim Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Zirakzadeh, Cyrus E.Social Movements in Politics. London: Longman, 1997.Google Scholar