Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:08:02.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A snapshot of historiography on the nineteenth-century Ottoman provinces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

U. Ceren Ünlü
U. Ceren Ünlü*
Affiliation:
The Atatürk Institute for Modern Turkish History, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, ucerenu@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 42 , Spring 2010 , pp. 237 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akarlı, Engin Deniz. “Book Review on Eugene L. Rogan's Frontiers of the State in the Late Ottoman Empire: Transjordan, 1850-1921.” Journal of Islamic Studies 12, no. 3 (2001): 349–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lisa. “Nineteenth-Century Reform in Ottoman Libya.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 16, no. 3 (1984): 325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ateş, Sabri. “Empires at the Margin: Towards a History of the Ottoman-Iranian Borderland Peoples, 1843-1881.” Dissertation, New York University, 2006.Google Scholar
Blumi, Isa. “The Consequences of Empire in the Balkans and Red Sea: Reading Possibilities in the Transformations of the Modern World.” Dissertation, New York University, 2005.Google Scholar
Ceylan, Ebubekir. “Ottoman Centralization and Modernization in the Province of Baghdad, 1831-1872.” Dissertation, Boğaziçi University, 2006.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda T. “The Ottoman State.” The Historian 68, no. 4 (2006): 813–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Haim. The Social Origins of the Modern Middle East. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. Application of the Tanzimat and Its Social Effects Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpat, Kemal H. “Comments on Contributions and the Borderlands.” In Ottoman Borderlands: Issues, Personalities and Political Changes, edited by Karpat, Kemal H. and Zens, Robert W.. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kiyotaki, Keiko. “Ottoman Land Policies in the Province of Baghdad, 1831-1881.” Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin, 1997.Google Scholar
Klein, Janet. “Powerinthe Periphery: The Hamidiye Light Cavalry and the Struggle over Ottoman Kurdistan, 1890-1914.” Dissertation, Princeton University, 2002.Google Scholar
Ma'oz, Moshe. Ottoman Reform in Syria and Palestine, 1840-1861: The Impact of the Tanzimat on Politics and Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Makdisi, Ussama. “Ottoman Orientalism.” The American Historical Review 107, no. 3 (2002): 768–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortaylı, İlber. Türkiye idare Tarihi. Ankara: Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü, 1979.Google Scholar
Petrov, Milen V. “Tanzimat for the Countryside: Midnat Paşa and the Vilayet of Danube, 1864-1868.” Dissertation, Princeton University, 2006.Google Scholar
Quataert, Donald. ‘Recent Writings in Late Ottoman History.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 35. no. 1 (2003): 133–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogan, Eugene L.Frontiers of the State in the Late Ottoman Empire: Transjordan, 1850-1921. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rogan, Eugene L.. “Incorporating the Periphery: The Ottoman Extension of Direct Rule over Southeastern Syria (Transjordan), 1867-1914.” Dissertation, Harvard University, 1991.Google Scholar
Thompson, Elizabeth. “Ottoman Political Reform in the Provinces: The Damascus Advisory Council in 1844-45.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 25, no. 3 (1993): 457–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar