Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:19:52.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying autocratization in Turkey: political institutions, populism, and neoliberalism

Review products

WilliamHale and ErgunÖzbudun, Islamism, Democracy, and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the JDP (London: Routledge, 2010).
İsmetAkça, AhmetBekmen, and Barış AlpÖzden (eds.), Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony (London: Pluto Press, 2014).
BaharBaşer and Ahmet ErdiÖztürk (eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Turkey: Elections, Resistance and the AKP (London: I.B.Tauris, 2017).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2020

Yunus Sözen
Yunus Sözen*
Affiliation:
Le Moyne College, Department of Political Science, Reilly Hall 414, 1419 Salt Springs Road, Syracuse, NY13214, sozenmy@lemoyne.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this review article I classify the literature on the Turkish political regime during Justice and Development Party rule as two waves of studies, and a potential third wave. The first wave was prevalent at least until the Gezi uprisings in 2013. I argue that, in this wave, the main debate was between two rival and largely culturalist perspectives with conceptual toolkits that tended to interpret regime change through the lens of social transformations. I also maintain that scholarly works written from the hegemonic perspective of this wave, utilizing center–periphery and state–society dichotomies, and a narrow range of concepts from the democratization literature (from defective democracy to democratic consolidation), have misidentified/misinterpreted burgeoning autocratization in Turkey as democratization, albeit with problems. The Gezi uprisings brought to the fore already existing authoritarian features of the Turkish political regime and led to the second wave of studies. In the second wave, the focus was on naming Turkey’s new political regime as a diminished subtype of authoritarianism, and thick descriptions of different facets of Turkey’s new authoritarianism. Finally, I suggest that there is a need for a third wave that builds on recent studies and focuses on explaining Turkey’s autocratization process and democratic breakdown, as well as the impact of autocratization on other aspects of Turkish politics and society.

Type
Review Article
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 63 , November 2020 , pp. 209 - 235
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ak Parti İddianamesi. Ankara: Elips, 2008.Google Scholar
Aknur, Müge, ed. Democratic Consolidation in Turkey. Florida: Universal Publishers, 2012.Google Scholar
Akşin, Sina. Kısa Türkiye Tarihi. İstanbul: İş Bankası, 2007.Google Scholar
Aslan-Akman, Canan. “The 2011 Parliamentary Elections in Turkey and Challenges Ahead for Democratic Reform under a Dominant Party System.” Mediterranean Politics 17(1) (2012): 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayan, Pelin. “Authoritarian Party Structures in Turkey: A Comparison of the Republican People’s Party and the Justice and Development Party.” Turkish Studies 11(2) (2010): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aytaç, Selim and Elçi, Ezgi, “Populism in Turkey.” In Populism around the world, ed. Stockemer, D.. Cham: Springer, 2019, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baykan, Toygar S. The Justice and Development Party in Turkey: Populism, Personalism, Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Berkes, Niyazi. The Development of Secularism in Turkey. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27(1) (2017): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. Liberalism and Democracy. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. “How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism.” Democratization 16(2) (2009): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassani, Andrea and Tomani, Luca. “Reversing Regimes and Concepts: From Democratization to Autocratization.” European Political Science (2018): 1–16.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali. “Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?” Insight Turkey 13(3) (2011): 43–62.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali and Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. Turkish Democracy Today: Elections, Protest and Stability in an Islamic Society. London: I.B.Tauris, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dağı, İhsan. “Islamist Parties and Democracy: Turkey’s AKP in Power.” Journal of Democracy 19(3) (2008): 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
De la Torre, Carlos. “Introduction: Power to the People?” In The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives, ed. de la Torre. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Elgie, Robert. “From Linz to Tsebelis: Three Waves of Presidential/Parliamentary Studies?” Democratization 12(1) (2005), 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, Recep Tayyip. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Kalem Kitabevi, 2011 [2009], 456.Google Scholar
Erişen, Cengiz and Kubicek, Paul, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Turkey: Micro and Macro Challenges. London: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esen, Berk and Gümüşçü, Şebnem. “Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 37(9) (2016): 1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth. Why Dominant Parties Lose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürsoy, Yaprak, “Turkish Public Opinion on the Coup Allegations: Implications for Democratization.” Political Science Quarterly 130(1) (2013): 103–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heper, Metin. The State Tradition in Turkey. North Humberside: Eothen Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Heper, Metin. “The Justice and Development Party Government and the Military in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 6(2) (2005): 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heper, Metin. “Islam, Conservatism, and Democracy in Turkey: Comparing Turgut Özal and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.” Insight Turkey 15(2) (2013): 141–56.Google Scholar
Heper, Metin and Çınar, Menderes. “Parliamentary Government with a Strong President: The Post-1989 Turkish Experience.” Political Science Quarterly 111(3) (1996): 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İnsel, Ahmet. “The AKP and Normalizing Democracy in Turkey.” South Atlantic Quarterly 102(2/3) (2003): 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Kulturkampf in Turkey: The Constitutional Referendum of September 12, 2010.” South European Society and Politics 17(1) (2012): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaveli, Halil. Why Turkey Is Authoritarian. London: Pluto Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kili, Suna. Atatürk Devrimi: Bir Çağdaşlaşma Modeli. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1980.Google Scholar
Laebens, Melis G. and Öztürk, Aykut. “Partisanship and Autocratization: Polarization, Power Asymmetry, and Partisan Social Identities in Turkey.” Comparative Political Studies (2020): https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020926199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan, eds. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Ceren. Religious Politics in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührmann, Anna and Lindberg, Staffan. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New about It?” Democratization 26(7) (2019): 1095–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardin, Şerif. “Center–Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics.” Daedalus 102(1) (1973): 169–90.Google Scholar
Mavioğlu, Ertuğrul. Cenderedeki Medya, Tenceredeki Gazeteci. İstanbul: İthaki, 2012.Google Scholar
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem and Keyman, Fuat. “Turkey under the AKP: The Era of Dominant-Party Politics.” Journal of Democracy 1(23) (2012): 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbay, Cenk, Erol, Maral, Terzioğlu, Ayşecan, and Umut Türem, Z.. The Making of Neoliberal Turkey (London: Routledge, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift.” South European Society and Politics 19(2) (2014): 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parla, Taha. Türkiye’de Anayasalar. Istanbul: İletişim, 2007.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework of Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Somer, Murat. “Understanding Turkey’s Democratic Breakdown: Old vs. New and Indigenous vs. Global Authoritarianism.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(4) (2016): 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer, Murat. “Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1) (2019): 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Mümtaz. 100 Soruda Anayasanin Anlamı. İstanbul: Gerçek, 1997.Google Scholar
Sözen, Yunus. “Turkey between Tutelary Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism.” Private View 13 (2008): 78–84.Google Scholar
Sözen, Yunus. “AKP ve bir Otoriterleşme İdeolojisi Olarak Neo-muhafazakar Popülizm.” Yeniyol 43 (2011): 7–23.Google Scholar
Sözen, Yunus. “Populist Peril to Democracy: The Sacralization and Singularization of Competitive Elections.” Political Studies Review 17(3) (2019): 267–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sözen, Yunus. “Competition in a Populist Authoritarian Regime: The June 2018 Dual Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 24(3) (2019): 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansel, Cemal Burak. “Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond Narratives of Progress.” South European Society and Politics 23(2) (2018): 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taşkın, Yüksel “AKP’s Move to ‘Conquer’ the Center-Right: Its Prospects and Possible Impacts on the Democratization Process.” Turkish Studies 1(9) (2008): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepe, Sultan. “Turkey’s AKP: A Model “Muslim-Democratic” Party?” Journal of Democracy 3(16) (2005): 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavuz, Hakan. “Turkey: Islam without Shari’a.” In Shari’a Politics, ed. Hefner, R. W.. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, Deniz. “AKP ve Neoliberal Popülizm.” In AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu ed. Uzgel, İ. and Duru, B.. Ankara: Phoenix, 2009.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, Ergun et al. “A Sociological Representation of the Justice and Development Party?” Turkish Studies 1(8) (2007): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar