Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:33:55.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Syrian refugees in seasonal agricultural work: a case of adverse incorporation in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2016

Sinem Kavak*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Department of Political Science and International Relations, İstanbul and Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, France, skavak@ens-cachan.fr

Abstract

This article examines how the labor market in seasonal migrant work in agriculture in Turkey has changed with the influx of refugees from Syria. Based on both qualitative and quantitative fieldwork in ten provinces of Turkey, the article discusses precarity in seasonal migrant work in agriculture and the impact of the entry of refugees on this labor market. The analysis of precariousness of both Turkish-citizen migrant workers and refugees suggests that precarity is a relational phenomenon. The multifaceted vulnerabilities of groups in the lower echelons of the labor market resonate with one another and the adverse incorporation of vulnerable groups into the labor market pushes the market in a more insecure and informal direction.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Author’s Note: I would like to express my gratitude to the research team of Support to Life International Humanitarian Aid’s Combatting Child Labor program for participating in the fieldwork with me, and also to professors Emre Erdoğan, Pınar Uyan Semerci, and Mine Eder for their comments and guidance.

References

Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi (AFAD). Syrian Refugees in Turkey, 2013: Field Survey Results. Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, 2013.Google Scholar
Ashton, D.N. and Maguire, M.J.. “Dual Labour Market Theory and the Organization of Local Labour Markets.” International Journal of Social Economics 11, no. 7 (1984): 106120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Henry, Crow, Ben, Mackintosh, Maureen, and Martin, Charlotte, eds. The Food Question: Profits vs. People. London: Earthscan, 1990.Google Scholar
Blair, John P. and Fichtenbaum, Rudy H.. “Changing Black Employment Patterns.” In The Metropolis in Black and White: Place, Power, and Polarization. Edited by George C. Galster and Edward W. Hill. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, 1992. 7292.Google Scholar
Bracking, Sarah. The Political Economy of Chronic Poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 23, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, 2003.Google Scholar
Clairmont, Don, Apostle, Richard, and Kreckel, Reinhard. “The Segmentation Perspective as a Middle- range Conceptualization in Sociology.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 8, no. 3 (Summer 1983): 245272.Google Scholar
Erdoğan, Murat. “Türkiye’deki Suriyeliler: Toplumsal Kabul ve Uyum Araştırması .” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Göç ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Merkezi, 2014.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ian and Sassen, Saskia. “Restructuring the Urban Labour Markets.” In Divided Cities: New York & London in the Contemporary World. Edited by Susan S. Fainstein, Ian Gordon, and Michael Harloe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. 105128.Google Scholar
Hickey, Sam and du Toit, Andries. Adverse Incorporation, Social Exclusion and Chronic Poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 81. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, Jane. “Politics and the Construction of Women as Second-class Workers.” In The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation. Edited by Frank Wilkinson, London: Academic Press, 1981. 167191.Google Scholar
Lewis, Hannah, Dwyer, Peter, Hodkinson, Stuart, and Waite, Louise. “Precarious Lives: Experiences of Forced Labour among Refugees and Asylum Seekers in England.” Leeds: University of Leeds, 2013.Google Scholar
Lewis, Hannah, Dwyer, Peter, Hodkinson, Stuart, and Waite, Louise. “Hyper-precarious Lives: Migrants, Work and Forced Labour in the Global North.” Progress in Human Geography (2014): 121. doi: 10.1177/0309132514548303.Google Scholar
Morales, Rebecca and Bonilla, Frank. “Restructuring and the New Inequality.” In Latinos in a Changing U.S. Economy: Comparative Perspectives on Growing Inequality. Edited by Rebecca Morales and Frank Bonilla. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 127.Google Scholar
Phillips, Nicola. “Unfree Labour and Adverse Incorporation in the Global Economy: Comparative Perspectives on Brazil and India.” Economy and Society 42, no. 2 (2013): 171196. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2012.718630.Google Scholar
Orhun, Oytun and Gündoğar, Sabiha Şenyücel. “Effects of the Syrian Refugees on Turkey.” Ortadoğu Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, Report No: 195 (January 2015). http://www.orsam.org.tr/en/enUploads/Article/Files/201518_rapor195ing.pdf.Google Scholar
Osberg, Lars, Mazany, R.L., Apostle, Richard, and Clairmont, Don. “Job Mobility, Wage Determination and Market Segmentation in the Presence of Sample Selection Bias.” The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique 19, no. 2 (1986): 319346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponte, Stefano. Developing a “Vertical” Dimension to Chronic Poverty Research: Some Lessons from Global Value Chain Analysis. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 111, Manchester: University of Manchester, 2008.Google Scholar
Semerci, Pınar Uyan, Erdoğan, Emre, and Kavak, Sinem. Mevsimlik Gezici Tarım İşçiliği Raporu. Hayata Destek İnsani Yardım Derneği, 2014.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şimşek, Zeynep. Mevsimlik Tarım İşçilerinin İhtiyaçlarının Belirlenmesi Araştırması: Nüfus/Tarım İşgücü Göçü/Yaşam Koşulları/Üreme Sağlığı. Ankara: United Nations Population Fund, 2012.Google Scholar