Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:55:04.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theories of exceptional executive powers in Turkey, 1933–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

Joakim Parslow
Joakim Parslow*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages (IKOS), 0315, Blindern, Oslo, Norway, joakim.parslow@ikos.uio.no.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Turkish constitutions have generally sought to limit the executive branch’s emergency powers by codifying and subjecting them to judicial and parliamentary supervision. In practice, however, ever since the single-party regime of the interwar years, cabinets have wielded wide powers to suspend rights and exercise discretion concerning both security issues and property and finance regimes. The result has been a legal system that, barred from explicitly embracing executive prerogative as a matter of principle, has instead dispersed “exceptional” powers throughout the fabric of the statutes, temporary laws, regulations, and decrees with which the state articulates its authority. The task of maintaining a semblance of normality and coherence within this scattered and contradictory system has been left to legal theoreticians. This article examines how three such theoreticians—the law professors Sıddık Sami Onar, Ali Fuad Başgil, and Ragıp Sarıca—responded to the cabinet’s recourse to emergency powers during the troubled 1930s and 1940s. Instead of defending rule-of-law principles, I argue, these formative figures integrated prerogative into the sphere of ordinary legality, thereby transforming exceptional powers into a normal mode of governance.

Keywords

public lawintellectualsemergency powersconstitutionWorld War II
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 55 , November 2016 , pp. 29 - 54
Copyright
© New Perspectives on Turkey and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ahmet Samim, [Murat Belge]. “The Tragedy of the Turkish Left.” New Left Review I, no. 126 (April 1981): 60–85.Google Scholar
Aldıkaçtı, Orhan. Anayasa Hukukumuzun Gelişmesi ve 1961 Anayasası (Ders Notları). İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası, 1970.Google Scholar
Aybars, Ergun. İstiklal Mahkemeleri. Ankara: Ayraç, 2009.Google Scholar
Bancaud, Alain. Une exception ordinaire. Paris: Gallimard, 2002.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. Cihan Sulhu ve İnsan Hakları. İstanbul: Hür Fikirleri Yayma Cemiyeti, 1948.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. “Devlet Nizamı ve Hukuk, Devletle Hukuk Arasındaki Münasebet Üzerine bir İzah Denemesi.” İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 16, no. 1–2 (1950): 27–50.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. “Kanunun hâkimiyeti prensibi.” İzmir Barosu Dergisi 2, no. 1–5 (1936): 63–75.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. “La Constitution et le Régime politique.” In La vie juridique des peuples, Vol. 7. Edited by H. Lévy-Ullmann and B. Mirkine-Guetzévitch. Paris: Librairie Delagrave, 1939. 9–38.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. “Muasır Devlette Memur Meselesi ve Memurların Mesleki Vazife ve Terbiyesi.” İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 7, no. 4 (1941): 790–803.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. Türkiye Teşkilat Hukukunda Nizamname Mefhumu ve Nizamnamelerin Mahiyeti ve Tabi olduğu Hukuki Rejim. İstanbul: Kenan Basımevi ve Klişe Fabrikası, 1939.Google Scholar
Başgil, Ali Fuad. “Vatandaşların Amme Hakları ve Milli Camianın Emniyet ve Disiplin Meselesi.” In Üniversite Haftası, Erzurum, 13-7-1940–19-7-1940. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları [Ahmed İhsan Matbaası], 1941. 101–114.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Daver, Bülent. İcra Organının Istisnai Yetkileri Bakımından Fevkalâde Hal Rejimleri: (Türkiye’de - Yabancı Memleketlerde). Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası, 1961.Google Scholar
de Malberg, Carré. La loi, expression de la volonté générale: Étude sur le concept de la loi dans la Constitution de 1875. Paris: Sirey, 1931.Google Scholar
Deringil, Selim. Turkish Foreign Policy During the Second World War: An “Active” Neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Devaux, Jean. Le régime des décrets. Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1927.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Introduction: Why Carl Schmitt?” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism. Edited by David Dyzenhaus. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998. 1–18.Google Scholar
Earle, Edward Mead. “The New Constitution of Turkey.” Political Science Quarterly 40, no. 1 (1925): 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erozan, Boğaç, ed. Ahmet Ağaoğlu ve Hukuk-ı Esasiye Ders Notları (1926–1927). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2012.Google Scholar
Erozan, Hüseyin Boğaç. “Producing Obedience: Law Professors and the Turkish State”. (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2005).Google Scholar
Esen, Selin. Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta ve Türkiye’de Olağanüstü Hal Rejimi. Ankara: Adalet, 2008.Google Scholar
Esmein, Adhémar. “De la délégation du pouvoir législatif: A l’occasion du projet dit ‘des pleins pouvoirs’ présenté par M. Crispi au Parlement italien.” Revue politique et parlementaire 1, no. 1 (1894): 200–224.Google Scholar
Feldman, Leonard C. “The Banality of Emergency: On the Time and Space of ‘Political Necessity.’” In Sovereignty, Emergency, Legality. Edited by Austin Sarat. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 136–164.Google Scholar
Gözler, Kemal. Kanun Hükmünde Kararnameler. Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi, 2000.Google Scholar
Güriz, Adnan. “Sources of Turkish Law.” In Introduction to Turkish Law. Edited by T. Ansay, and D. Wallace Jr. New York: Kluwer, 2005. 1–18.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence and Abel, Richard L. “Lawyers in the Civil Law World.” In Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World. Edited by Richard L. Abel and Philip C. Lewis. Berkeley, London, and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988. 1–53.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Ernst E. Die Verfassung der Türkischen Republik. Die Staatsverfassungen der Welt 7. Frankfurt am Main and Berlin: Alfred Metzner Verlag, 1966.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Gareth, “Erdoğan’s Invitation to Gülen: Reconciliation or Power Play?” The Turkey Analyst/Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Silk Road Studies Program. June 25, 2012. http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/inside/turkey/2012/120625B.html.Google Scholar
Jongerden, Joost. “Dams and Politics in Turkey: Utilizing Water, Developing Conflict.” Middle East Policy 17, no. no. 1 (2010): 137–143.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. The Pure Theory of Law. Translated by Max Knight. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Kuzu, Burhan. Türk Anayasa Hukukunda Kanun Hükmünde Kararnameler. İstanbul: Üçdal Neşriyat, 1985.Google Scholar
Lee, H.P. Emergency Powers. Sydney: Law Book Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Mumcu, Uğur. Aybar ile Söyleşi: Sosyalizm ve Bağımsızlık. Ankara: Tekin Yayınevi, 1986.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. Devletçilik ve İdare Hukuku. Hukuk İlmini Yayma Kurumu Konferanslar Serisi 54. Ankara: Hukuk İlmini Yayma Kurumu, 1937.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. Fevkâlade Hallerin Hukuki Nizam Üzerindeki Tesirleri. İstanbul: Kenan Basımevi, 1943.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. “Hukuk Telakkimizin Geçirdiği Buhranlar.” Siyasi İlimler Mecmuası 20, no. 233 (August 1950): 173–178.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. İdare Hukukunun Umumi Esasları Vol. 1. İstanbul: İsmail Akgün, 1960.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. İdare Hukuku (Sömestre 3–4). İstanbul: Güneş Matbaası, 1933.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. “İlim ve Tatbikat.” Mülkiye Mektebi Mecmuası no. 5 (August 1931): 5–8.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. İstimlâk Mevzuatımız ve Tatbikatımız Üzerinde Bazı Düşünceler. Ankara: Türk Hukuk Kurumu, 1943.Google Scholar
Onar, Sıddık Sami. “Nizamname ve Talimatnameler.” İzmir Barosu Dergisi 2, no. 3–7 (1937): 147–274.Google Scholar
Özavcı, Hilmi Ozan. Intellectual Origins of the Republic: Ahmet Ağaoğlu and the Genealogy of Liberalism in Turkey. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Özbudun, Ergun. The Constitutional System of Turkey: 1876 to the Present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Özel, Işık. State-Business Alliances and Economic Development: Turkey, Mexico and North Africa. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Saint-Bonnet, F. L’état d’exception . Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2001.Google Scholar
Sarıca, Ragıp. “Türk Devlet Şurası İçtihatlarına Göre Hükumet Tasarrufları.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 9, no. 1–3 (1943): 415–431.Google Scholar
Sarıca, Ragıp. Türkiyede İcra Uzvunun Tanzim Salâhiyeti: Nizamnameler, Talimatnameler, Türk Parasının Kıymetini Koruma Kararnameleri, Millî Korunma Kanununa Müstenit Kararnameler. İstanbul: Cumhuriyet Matbaası, 1943.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Legal and Extralegal Emergencies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics . Edited by Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelement, and Gregory A. Caldeira. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. 165–184.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Une étude de droit constitutionnel comparé: L’évolution récente du problème des délégations legislatives.” In Introduction à l’étude du droit comparé: Recueil d’études en l’honneur d’Edouard Lambert. Vol. 2. Translated by H. Mankiewiez, and Paul Roubier. Paris: Sirey, 1938. 200–210.Google Scholar
Shissler, A. Holly. Between Two Empires: Ahmet Ağaoğlu and the New Turkey. London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2003.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael. The Law under the Swastika: Studies on Legal History in Nazi Germany . Translated by Thomas Dunlap. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Üskül, Zafer. Siyaset ve Asker: Cumhuriyet Döneminde Sıkıyönetim Uygulamaları. İstanbul: AFA Yayınları, 1989.Google Scholar
VanderLippe, John. The Politics of Turkish Democracy: Ismet Inönü and the Formation of the Multi-Party System, 1938–1950. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vol. 1. Edited by Guenther Roth, and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Weiker, Walter F. Political Tutelage and Democracy in Turkey: The Free Party and Its Aftermath. Leiden: Brill, 1973.Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik Jan. The Unionist Factor: The Rôle of the Committee of Union and Progress in the Turkish National Movement, 1905–1926. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984.Google Scholar