Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:25:00.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tansley Review No. 106 Cyclic nucleotides in higher plants: the enduring paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

RUSSELL P. NEWTON
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
LUC ROEF
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Plantenbiochemie en -fysiologie, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen (UIA), Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Antwerp, Belgium
ERWIN WITTERS
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Plantenbiochemie en -fysiologie, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen (UIA), Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Antwerp, Belgium
HARRY VAN ONCKELEN
Affiliation:
Laboratorium voor Plantenbiochemie en -fysiologie, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen (UIA), Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Antwerp, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

For three decades, hypotheses relating to the occurrence and function of cyclic nucleotides in higher plants have been highly controversial. Although cyclic nucleotides had been shown to have key regulatory roles in animals and bacteria, investigations with higher plants in the 1970s and early 1980s were criticized on the basis of (i) a lack of specificity of effects apparently elicited by cyclic nucleotides, (ii) the equivocal identification of putative endogenous cyclic nucleotides and (iii) ambiguity in the identification of enzymes connected with cyclic nucleotide. More recent evidence based on more rigorous identification procedures has demonstrated conclusively the presence of cyclic nucleotides, nucleotidyl cyclases and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in higher plants, and has identified plant processes subject to regulation by cyclic nucleotides. Here we review the history of the debate, the recent evidence establishing the presence of these compounds and their role; future research objectives are discussed.

Type
Tansley Review
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)