Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T00:38:33.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methods of assessing leaf-fracture properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

N. ARANWELA
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
G. SANSON
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
J. READ
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Numerous authors have attempted to quantify the physical properties of leaves in relation to aspects of leaf ecology, including decomposition, sclerophylly, herbivory, and leaf function and longevity. This paper examines the relative merits of the punch-and-die, tearing and shearing tests for assessing leaf physical properties. We conducted a series of these three mechanical tests on leaves of Solanum laciniatum, and determined the effect of various test parameters on the measurement of fracture properties. For the punch-and-die test, the parameters considered were machine speed, clearance between the punch and the die, edge definition of the punch, and area of the punch. Aspects of the tearing test examined were notch length, end effects, and length-to-width requirements of test strips, and for shearing tests the effects of blade proximity, angle and sharpness were investigated. All the test parameters investigated were found significantly to affect the assessment of leaf-fracture properties. In addition, fracture properties were found to vary significantly within leaves. Some general principles for designing and implementing tests are outlined. This study suggests that while punching and shearing tests are useful means of quantifying leaf fracture properties, the value of the tearing test may be reduced as it is most constrained by the biological nature of the test material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)