Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:29:03.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tetraphenylphosphonium cation (TPP+) is not a reliable membrane potential probe in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus R-2 PCC 7942

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

RAYMOND J. RITCHIE
Affiliation:
Biology A-12, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia (e-mail rayr@bio.usyd.edu.au) Present address: Science & Technology K-12, The University of Western Sydney-Hawkesbury, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia (e-mail r.ritchie@uws.edu.au).
Get access

Abstract

Uptake of the lipophilic cation, tetraphenylphosphonium (TPP+), which is often used as a membrane potential probe, was studied in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus R-2 (PCC 7942) to determine if the technique was valid for these cells. Lipophilic cation probes are notorious for giving inconsistent estimates of membrane potential (ΔΨ) using the Nernst equation (ETPP+=ΔΨ). It is necessary to correct for the large amounts of TPP+ bound to the surface of the cells. The rate of equilibration of intracellular TPP+ is very fast (t½≈1–3 min), hence the permeability of the plasmalemma to TPP+ (PTPP+≈10–50 nm s−1) is very high. There appears to be an active uptake of TPP+ with a pH optimum at about pHo 7.5. TPP+ does not readily uncouple Synechococcus cells. Carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) and dinitrophenol depolarized ETPP+, but monensin made ETPP+ more negative. Accumulation of TPP+ is not affected by [K+] in the medium in a way consistent with it acting as a reporter of the membrane potential. Addition of K+, NH4+ and HCO3 altered the uptake rate of TPP+ in a way consistent with electrogenic uptake of these ions but the effects were smaller than those found using the 86Rb+/valinomycin and 201TI+ probes. A comparison has been made with ΔΨ determinations using other membrane potential probes. ETPP+ was often close to the value of the membrane potential obtained using other methods under control conditions but effects of experimental treatments are sometimes inconsistent with those found using other ΔΨ probes. The TPP+ method is therefore unreliable and could be seriously misleading.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of New Phytologist 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)