Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T09:09:41.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critical Note in Response to J. C. O'Neill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Thomas R. W. Longstaff
Thomas R. W. Longstaff
Affiliation:
Waterville, Maine, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , October 1976 , pp. 116 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 116 note 1 O'Neill, J. C., ‘The Synoptic Problem’, New Testament Studies, xxi (no. 2, January 1975), 273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 116 note 2 Ibid. 273–4.

page 116 note 3 Ibid. 274–5.

page 116 note 4 Cited in Grant, R. M., The Earliest Lives of Jesus (London: S.P.C.K., 1961), p. 48.Google Scholar

page 116 note 1 Sanders, E. P., The Tendencies of the Synoptic Tradition (‘Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 9’; Cambridge: The University Press, 1969), p. 270.Google Scholar

page 116 note 2 Longstaff, Thomas R. W., ‘The Minor Agreements: An Examination of the Basic Argument’, The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, XXXVII (no. 2, April 1975), 184–92.Google Scholar

page 116 note 3 O'Neill, , op. cit. 285.Google Scholar