The Alleged Matthaean Errata

Norman Walker

doi:10.1017/S0028688500002253

The Alleged Matthaean Errata

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009

Norman Walker

Article contents

Abstract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Short Studies
Information: New Testament Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , July 1963 , pp. 391 - 394

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500002253 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

^{page 391 note 1} S. Vernon MacCasland, J.B.L. (June 1961), pp. 143-8.

^{page 391 note 2} I Kings xxiii. 31.

^{page 391 note 3} II Kings xxv. 27–30.

^{page 391 note 4} Ahaziah, II Kings viii. 25–x. 28; Joash, II Kings xi. 12–20; Amaziah, II Kings xiv. 1–20.

^{page 391 note 5} Life, par. 1.

^{page 391 note 6} Dan. v. 11, 18. R. P. Gougherty, Nabonidus and Belshazzar (1929).

^{page 392 note 1} Chamberlain, V.T. (1955), pp. 366–72.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 1} Grimm-Thayer, , Greek-English Lexicon of the N. T. (Edinburgh, 1888), p. 422.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 2} Gen. xii. 10 and xlvi. 6.

^{page 393 note 3} II Kings xxv. 26.

^{page 393 note 4} But packs everything into Thursday night and Friday morning.

^{page 393 note 5} Jaubert, La date de la Cène (Paris, 1957), Tableau de Concordance at the end.

^{page 394 note 1} Mark v. 17; x. 46–52; xi. 1–10.

^{page 394 note 2} Narborough in A New Commentary of Holy Scripture (S.P.C.K. 1928), N.T.p. 39.Google Scholar

^{page 394 note 3} Papias in Eus. H.P. iii. 39.

^{page 394 note 4} Butler, The Originality of St Matthew (Cambridge, 1951), p. 12, and two articles on the Didache: J.T.S. xi (1960), 265–83, and xii (1961), 38.Google Scholar

^{page 394 note 5} Carr, Gospel According to St Matthew (Cambridge, 1913), p. xvii.Google Scholar

^{page 394 note 6} Augustine, De cons. ev. 11.

Article contents

The Alleged Matthaean Errata

Abstract

Access options

References

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests