We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Chapter 9 is the pivot of Luke's gospel containing, as it does, the transfiguration as well as marking the transition from the Galilee ministry to the journey to Jerusalem. Not only is it rich in incident, it is also rich in the range of titles given to Jesus. It includes the first recognition, outside the infancy narrative, of Jesus' messianic role (9. 20), the first passion prediction of the Son of Man (9. 22) as well as the first mention of the future Son of Man (9. 26). Furthermore, the chapter contains two titles peculiar to Luke, Master (έπιστάτες, 9. 33, 49) and Chosen One (έκλελγμένος, 9. 35). Luke presents this wealth of christological material in answer to the question posed by Herod, ‘Who is this about whom I hear such things?’ (9. 9). The complexity of the christology in Luke 9 stems not only from the variety of the explicit titles but also from Luke's direct mention of, or allusions to, OT prophets who are used as antetypes for the prophetic role of Jesus. The prophetic ideas in the Lucan writings have been set out by Tiede but the importance of the prophetic element in Luke 9 seems to have been somewhat overlooked in the more detailed studies of this chapter. Ellis, in his essay on the sources of the christology of Luke 9, has noted the Moses typology and possible allusions to Isaiah's servant, although it is doubtful whether the use of κλελεγμέ in 9. 35 (cf κλεκτόζ, Isa 42. 1) and the prediction of Jesus' suffering and rejection are sufficient to make the presence of the servant idea here more than speculative.
1 Tiede, D. L., Prophecy and History in Luke-Acts (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980).Google Scholar
2 Ellis, E. E., ‘The Composition of Luke 9 and the Sources of its Christology’, Current Issues in Biblical and Patristic Interpretation: Studies in Honor of Merril C. Tenney (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975) 120–7, esp. 126.Google Scholar
3 Fitzmyer, J. A., ‘The Composition of Luke, Chapter 9’, Perspectives on Luke-Acts (ed. Talbert, Charles H.; Edinburgh: Clark, 1978) 139–52, esp. 146–7.Google Scholar
4 Moessner, D. P., ‘Luke 9.1–50; Luke's Preview of the Journey of the Prophet Like Moses of Deuteronomy’, JBL 102 (1983) 575–605.Google Scholar
5 E.g., Creed, J. M., The Gospel According to St. Luke (London: MacMillan 1930) 139–41.Google ScholarFitzmyer, J. A., The Gospel According to Luke, I–LX The Anchor Bible (New York: Doubleday 1981) 823–30.Google Scholar
6 Evans, C. F., ‘The Central Section of St. Luke's Gospel’, Studies in the Gospels; Essays in Memory of R. H. Lightfoot (ed. Nineham, D. E.; Oxford: Blackwell, 1957) 37–40.Google Scholar
7 Talbert, C. H., Literary Patterns, Theological Themes, and the Genre of Luke-Acts (Missoula: Scholars Press SBLM 20, 1975) 26–9, 61–2. Talbert produces evidence for the parallelism in content between Luke 9. 1–48 and 22. 7–23. 16 as well as between Luke 9 and Acts 1. 3–11. The parallels show the literary structure of Luke's writings and how one event points to others and is fulfilled by them but they do not, in themselves, explain the christological ideas in Luke 9.Google Scholar
8 Fitzmyer, , ‘Composition’, 144.Google Scholar
9 Danker, F. W., Jesus and the New Age; A Commentary on St. Luke's Gospel (Revised ed. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988) 193. Danker sees the suffering and resurrection of Jesus as being counter to popular expectation in 9. 19. He also regards the messianic title as distinguishing Jesus ‘from any other figures in Israel's past history. The association of Elijah with Jesus has served its purpose’. This seems unlikely in view of the transfiguration and 9. 54–56.Google ScholarThe contrast is also emphasised by Bock, D. L., Proclamation from Prophecy and Pattern: Lucan Old Testament Christology (Sheffield: JSOT Press 1987) 323. Ellis, ‘Composition’, 122, also sees the prophetic terms as being a misunderstanding for which Peter is later rebuked by the heavenly voice at 9. 33.Google Scholar
10 Fitzmyer, , Luke, 774–5.Google Scholar
11 Fitzmyer, , Luke, 799.Google Scholar
12 Fitzmyer, , Luke, 799–800.Google Scholar
13 Conzelmann, H., The Theology of St. Luke (London: Faber & Faber 1960) 57–59. Conzelmann regards the transfiguration as ‘ratifying it (the passion) to Jesus himself to prepare him for his path of suffering’. This seems to be too restricted a view of Luke's purpose, perhaps because Conzelmann equates the ‘exodus’ of Jesus with his passion. But see also p. 59, n. 2.Google ScholarAlso see Talbert, , Patterns, note 7 above.Google Scholar
14 Davies, J. G., He Ascended into Heaven (London: Lutterworth, 1958) 39–41.Google ScholarSee also Talbert, , Patterns, 61–3.Google Scholar
15 Boobyer, G. H., St. Mark and the Transfiguration Story (Edinburgh: Clark, 1942) 76–7.Google Scholar
16 Evans, Craig A., ‘Luke's Use of the Elijah/Elisha Narratives and the Ethic of Election’, JBL 106 (1987) 75–83.Google Scholar
17 Evans, , ‘Election’, 82.Google Scholar
18 Creed, , St. Luke, 65.Google ScholarSee also Tiede, , Prophecy, 19–20.Google Scholar
19 Ravens, D. A. S., ‘The Setting of Luke's Account of the Anointing: Luke 7. 2–8. 3’, NTS 34 (1988) 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
