Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:21:44.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No Flirting with Philistinism: Shakespearean Production at Miss Horniman's Gaiety Theatre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Viv Gardner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first production at Britain's first true repertory theatre – the Gaiety, in Manchester – under Annie Horniman's management was of a Shakespeare play: William Poel's staging of Measure for Measure, analyzed in detail by Richard Foulkes in Theatre Quarterly No. 39 (1981). Yet Miss Horniman's attitude both to Poel's experimental ‘Elizabethanism’ and to subsequent attempts at Shakespeare at the Gaiety remained ambivalent, and influenced by such personal tensions and disagreements as saw off Lewis Casson after his radical and political reading of Julius Caesar, in favour of safer stuff conceived as an alternative to Christmas pantomime. The author, Viv Gardner, teaches in the Drama Department of the University of Manchester: she is a former Book Reviews Editor of NTQ, and currently co-editor of the Women and Theatre papers. Here, she sets Shakespearean production at the Gaiety into the context of Miss Horniman and her colleagues' ambitions for the Gaiety and its intended role in Manchester's civic life.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 55 , August 1998 , pp. 220 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliogaphy

Basil Dean Collection, John Rylands University Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Brook Collection, John Rylands University Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Horniman/Garrod Collection, John Rylands University Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Theatre Collection, Central Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Casson, Lewis, ‘William Poel and the Modern Theatre’, The Listener, 10 01 1952, p. 56–8.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Clare, Shakespeare and the Birmingham Repertory Theatre 1913–1929 (London: Society for Theatre Research, 1993).Google Scholar
Dean, Basil, Seven Ages: an Autobiography, 1888–1929 (London: Hutchinson, 1970).Google Scholar
Devlin, Diana, A Speaking Part: Lewis Casson and the Theatre of his Time (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1982).Google Scholar
Foley, Alice, A Bolton Childhood (Manchester: Extra-Mural Department, Manchester University and North West W.E.A., 1973).Google Scholar
Foulkes, Richard, ‘“Measure Still for Measure”: Miss Horniman and Mr. Poel at the Gaiety’, Theatre Quarterly, X, No. 39 (1981).Google Scholar
Foulkes, Richard, The Calverts: Actors of Some Importance (London: Society for Theare Research, 1992).Google Scholar
Goodie, Sheila, Annie Horniman: a Pioneer in Theatre (London: Methuen, 1990).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Dennis, Looking at Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Knowlson, Joyce, Red Plush and Gilt: the Heyday of Manchester Theatre (Manchester, n.d.).Google Scholar
Mazer, Cary M., Shakespeare Refashioned: Elizabethan Plays on Edwardian Stages (Michigan: UMI Research Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Montague, C. E., Dramatic Values (London: Methuen, 1911).Google Scholar
Payne, Ben Iden, A Life in a Wooden O (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Pogson, Rex, Miss Horniman and the Gaiety Theatre, Manchester (London: Rockliff, 1952).Google Scholar
Rowell, George, and Jackson, Anthony, The Repertory Movement: a History of Regional Theatre in Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Speaight, Robert, William Poel and the Elizabethan Revival (London: Heinemann, 1954).Google Scholar
Styan, J. L., The Shakespeare Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Trewin, J. C., Shakespeare on the English Stage (London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1964).Google Scholar