No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ernest Newman's Draft of a Berlioz Biography (1899) and its Appropriation of Emile Hennequin's Style Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2013
Abstract
Ernest Newman (1868–1959) first proposed a biography of Berlioz in the 1890s. A schedule for its research and writing was hatched, an agreement was made with a publisher for its manufacture, and Newman promptly set to work on the project. Alas, like so many other book projects Newman commenced in the 1890s, the Berlioz biography was never completed. Even though sketches or drafts of the book do not survive, there is plenty of evidence of the methodology and structure that Newman proposed for the book, for a work-in-progress article, ‘The prose of Berlioz,’ was published in the Chord in June 1899. It is a remarkable essay for its engagement with Berlioz's prose works and for its theorizing on musical biography. I illustrate that Newman's biographical method was partly inspired by the work of Emile Hennequin (1858–93), and was an approach that Newman had previously used in some of his literary criticism. However, I argue that despite Newman's claim of Hennequin's influence, the article's wider influence came from a larger pool of writers working on style theory, including Walter Pater, Walter Raleigh and J.A. Symonds.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
This article grew out of a presentation entitled ‘Ernest Newman's plans for a Berlioz biography in the 1890s’, delivered at the fifth biannual conference on nineteenth-century British music held at the University of Birmingham, 5–8 July 2007. Research for the article was completed in June–July 2009 while I was a Visiting Fellow at the Institute of Musical Research, University of London, funded by a Monash University Travel Grant. I am very grateful to the anonymous assessor of this article for comments that improved the final version.
1 Plans for the history of music, which appear to have been first raised in 1921, are recorded in Vera Newman's Ernest Newman: A Memoir by his Wife (London, 1963), 25.
Mention is made of Newman's planned Parsifal book on p. 269 of the book. It is well known that Newman had planned to write a Berlioz biography; see, for example, Berlioz, Romantic and Classic, ed. Peter Heyworth (London, 1972), 11: ‘He [Newman] did in fact intend to write a full-length study of Berlioz's music. That even in the last years of his life he had not abandoned this project is clear from the fact that he allowed no articles on Berlioz to be included in the two anthologies of his writings in the Sunday Times, which appeared near the end of his life …’.
2 Heyworth, Berlioz, Romantic and Classic.
3 Watt, Paul, ‘The Intellectual life of Ernest Newman in the 1890s’ (PhD diss., University of Sydney, 2009)Google Scholar
4 Pekacz, Jolanta T., ‘Memory, history and meaning: musical biography and its discontents’, Journal of Musicological Research 23/1 (2004), 39–80Google Scholar
5 See his Gluck and the Opera: A Study in Musical History (London, 1895); Richard Strauss (London, 1904); Elgar (London, 1906); Hugo Wolf (London, 1907); The Unconscious Beethoven (London, 1927). The Wagner biographies are A Study of Wagner (London, 1899); Wagner (London, 1904); Wagner as Man and Artist (London, 1914); The Life of Richard Wagner, 4 vols (New York, 1936–47) and Wagner (London, 1940).
6 Edmund Gurney, The Power of Sound (London, 1880)Google Scholar
7 Cooke, Bill, The Gathering of Infidels: A Hundred Years of the Rationalist Press Association (Amherst: Prometheus, 2004)Google Scholar
8 Edward B. Tylor's Researches into the Early History of Mankind and the Development of Civilization (London, 1865)Google Scholar
H.M. Posnett's, Comparative Literature (London, 1886)Google Scholar
Watt, ‘The Intellectual Life of Ernest Newman in the 1890s’, chapter 6Google Scholar
9 Remak, Henry H., ‘Comparative literature, its definition and function’, in Comparative Literature: Method and Perspective, ed. Newton P. Stallknecht and Horst Frenz (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
10 Newman, Gluck and the Opera, 1Google Scholar
11 Susan Bassnett, Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction (Oxford, 1993)Google Scholar
D.R. Oldroyd, Darwinian Impacts: An Introduction to the Darwinian Revolution (Milton Keynes, 1980), pp. 14–16Google Scholar
12 Woodruff D. Smith, Politics and the Science of Culture in Germany, 1840–1920 (New York, 1991), 59–62Google Scholar
Stocking, George W., Victorian Anthropology (New York: The Free Press, 1987)Google Scholar
13 Mugglestone, Erica, ‘Guido Adler's “The Scope, Method, and Aim of Musicology” (1885): An English Translation with an Historico-Analytical Commentary’, Yearbook for Traditional Music 13 (1981), 1–21Google Scholar
14 Correspondence from Ernest Newman to Bertram Dobell, 7 August 1898. MS Dobell 38484–5 (c. 37–38), Bodleian Library, Oxford. The vast majority of letters in this collection are from Newman to Dobell; very few letters from Dobell to Newman have survived.
15 Robertson, John M., ‘The problem of publishing’, Free Review, May 1895, 97–112Google Scholar
16 Correspondence, Newman to Dobell, 7 August 1898.
17 Further particulars of this essay are unknown.
18 Newman to Dobell, 26 November 1898.
19 Ibid.
20 Ibid., 7 February 1899.
21 Ibid., 10 February 1899.
22 Ibid., 16 April 1899.
23 Ibid.
24 The date in Newman's hand is indecipherable but it was written some time between 16 April 1899 and 14 May 1899.
25 Newman, Ernest, ‘The Prose of Berlioz’, Chord, June 1899, 48–55Google Scholar
26 Camlot, Jason, Style and the Nineteenth-Century British Critic: Sincere Mannerisms (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008)Google Scholar
27 Catherine LeGouis, Positivism and Imagination: Scientism and its limits in Emile Hennequin, Wilhelm Scherer, and Dmitri Pisarev (Lewisburg, 1997)Google Scholar
28 John M. Robertson, A History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, to the Period of the French Revolution, vol. 2, 4th edn (London, 1969 [1936])Google Scholar
29 John M. Robertson, Essays Towards a Critical Method (London, 1890)Google Scholar
30 Hennequin, Emile, ‘L'esthétique de Wagner et de la doctrine Spencérienne’, Revue Wagnérienne, 8 November 1885, 282–288Google Scholar
Bujić, Bojaned., Music in European Thought 1851–1912 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Paul, ‘The catalogue of Ernest Newman's library: revelations about his early life in the 1890s’, Script & Print 31/2 (2007), 81–103Google Scholar
31 Catherine LeGouis, Positivism and Imagination: scientism and its limits in Emile Hennequin, Wilhelm Scherer, and Dmitrii Pisarev (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press), 84Google Scholar
32 Wellek, A History of Modern Criticism: 1750–1850, vol. 4: The Later Nineteenth Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955)Google Scholar
33 LeGouis quoting Hennequin's Quelques écrivains français, (p. 28) in Positivism and Imagination, 85.
34 LeGouis, Positivism and Imagination, 85Google Scholar
35 ‘Après avoir fait l'analyse du vocabulaire, de la syntaxe, de la métrique, de la composition de Flaubert, nous avons énuméré ses procédés de description et de psychologie qui se réduisent à ceux du réalisme …’: Hennequin, ‘Gustave Flaubert’, 51.
36 Dowden, Edward, ‘Literary criticism in France’, in Studies in European Literature being the Taylorian Lectures, 1889–1899 (Oxford, 1900), 1–29Google Scholar
37 Newman, Ernest, ‘The Prose of Berlioz’, 49Google Scholar
38 It is known that Newman was also a devotee of Berlioz's music – evident in his essays in Heyworth's volume (Berlioz, Romantic and Classic) – which surely must have been a factor in deciding to write the composer's biography.
39 Ibid., 48.
40 Ibid., 49.
41 Newman, Ernest, ‘Berlioz, Romantic and Classic’, in Newman's Musical Studies (London and New York: Haskell, 1905), 29–30Google Scholar
42 Newman, Ernest, ‘The Prose of Berlioz’, 49Google Scholar
43 Ibid., 51.
44 Ibid., 53.
45 Ibid., 49.
46 Earle, English Prose: Its Elements, History, and Usage (London: Smith, Elder and Co., 1890)Google Scholar
47 Max Nordau, Degeneration, trans from the second edition from the German with an introduction by George L. Mosse (New York: Howard Fertig, 1968)Google Scholar
48 Nordau, Degeneration, 177Google Scholar
49 Ibid., 194 (‘absurdity of style’), 195 (‘incoherence in words’) and 197 (‘graphomanical muddle’).
50 Ibid., both quotes from page 180.
51 Ibid., 190.
52 Ibid., 194.
53 See note 36 above.
54 Symonds, J.A., Essays Speculative and Suggestive (London: Smith, Elder and Co., 1890)Google Scholar
Earle, John, English Prose: Its Elements, History, and Usage (London: Smith, Elder and Co., 1890)Google Scholar
55 Walter Raleigh, Style (London, 1897)Google Scholar
56 Pater, Appreciations, 10Google Scholar
57 Ibid., 11.
58 Ibid., 20, 24
59 Ibid., 31. Original emphasis.
60 Ibid., 29.
61 Ibid., 31.
62 Symonds, Essays Speculative and Suggestive, 168Google Scholar
63 Ibid., 167.
64 Ibid., 170.
65 Ibid.
66 Ibid., 171.
67 Ibid., 174.
68 Ibid., 182, 194, 194.
69 Ibid., 199.
70 Ibid., 199–200.
71 Ibid., 205–6.
72 Ibid., 217.
73 Ibid., 219.
74 Ibid., 220.
75 Ibid., 222.
76 Ibid., 223.
77 Earle, English Prose, 341Google Scholar
78 Ibid., 338.
79 Pater, quoted by Earle, 337.
80 Ibid., 338.
81 Ibid., 347.
82 Ibid., 348–9.
83 Ibid., 351
84 Ibid., 345–6.
85 Raleigh, Style, 2Google Scholar
86 Ibid., 10.
87 Ibid., 78.
88 Ibid., 87.
89 Ibid., 128.
90 Newman, Ernest, ‘Appreciation’, in John M. Robertson, A History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, xxiiGoogle Scholar
91 See, for example, Jason Camlot, Style and the Nineteenth-Century British Critic.
92 LeGouis, Positivism and Imagination, 76Google Scholar
93 Robertson, New Essays Towards a Critical Method (London, 1897), 28–29Google Scholar