Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:59:41.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Christiane Müller, Permeable Islands: A Contrastive Study of Swedish and English Adjunct Clause Extraction (Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A80). Lund: Lund University, 2019. Pp. 283.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2020

Terje Lohndal*
Affiliation:
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology and UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Language and Literature, NO-7491Trondheim, Norway. terje.lohndal@ntnu.no
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
© Nordic Association of Linguistics 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anward, Jan. 1982. Basic Swedish. In Engdahl, Elisabet & Ejerhed, Eva (eds.), Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages, 4775. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2019. Locality in syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondevik, Ingrid. 2018. Investigating the universality of adjunct islands through formal acceptability experiments: A comparative study of English and Norwegian. MA thesis, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj, Kizach, Johannes & Nyvad, Anne Mette. 2013a. Escape from the island: Grammaticality and (reduced) acceptability of wh-island violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42(1), 5170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj, Kizach, Johannes & Nyvad, Anne Mette. 2013b. The processing of syntactic islands: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26(2), 239251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet & Ejerhed, Eva (eds.). 1982. Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk [The Norwegian reference grammar]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. The syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalisation. In Coene, Martine, De Cuyper, Gretel & D’hulst, Yves (eds.), Current Studies in Comparative Romance Linguistics, 6190. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120(3), 628648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagström, Björn. 1976. Om satsflätans förutsättningar. En skiss [On the preconditions for islands: A sketch]. In Svensson, Lars, Wieselgren, Anne Marie & Hansson, Åke (eds.), Nordiska studier i filologi och lingvistik. Festskrift tillägnad Gösta Holm på 60-årsdagen den 8 juli 1976 [Nordic studies in philology and linguistics: A Festschrift in honor of Gösta Holm on the occasion of his 60th birthday on July 8 1976], 138150. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog [A grammar of the Danish language]. København: Syddansk universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Kush, Dave, Lohndal, Terje & Sprouse, Jon. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(3), 743779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kush, Dave, Lohndal, Terje & Sprouse, Jon. 2019. On the island sensitivity of topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation. Language 95(3), doi:10.1353/lan.0.0237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, Filippa. 2017. Extraction from Relative Clauses in Swedish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita. 1992. Locality: A Theory and Some of its Empirical Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nyvad, Anne Mette, Christensen, Ken Ramshøj & Vikner, Sten. 2017. CP-recursion in Danish: A cP/CP-analysis. The Linguistic Review 34(3), 449477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin. 2013. On the nature of island constraints. I: Language processing and reductionist accounts. In Sprouse, Jon & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, 64108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. The end of CED? Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10(1), 80126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna & Lohndal, Terje. 2017. Strong vs. weak islands. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn., 151. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan & Andersson, Erik. 1999. Svenska Akademiens Grammatik [The Swedish Academy grammar]. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar
Truswell, Robert. 2007. Locality of Wh-movement and the Individuation of Events. Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Truswell, Robert. 2011. Events, Phrases and Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutunjian, Damon, Heinat, Fredrik, Klingvall, Eva & Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2017. Processing relative clause extractions in Swedish. Frontiers in Psychology 8:2118, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Heinat, Fredrik, Klingvall, Eva & Tutunjian, Damon. 2017. An acceptability study of long-distance extractions in Swedish. In Escobar, Linda, Torrens, Vincent & Parodi, Teresa (eds.), Language Processing and Disorders, 103120. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar