No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On infinitivals hosting logophors: The case of Icelandic
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 November 2015
Abstract
This squib provides counterexamples to the claim that Icelandic reflexive sig cannot be construed logophorically if immediately contained inside an infinitival clause. Consequences for Eric Reuland's views on the division of labor between grammar and pragmatics are discussed.
- Type
- Short Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2015
References
REFERENCES
Diekhoff, Tobias J. C. 1911. Functional change of the subjunctive in German. The School Review 19, 624–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2009. Some remarks on the logophoric approach to LDR in Icelandic. Presented at the NORMS-Workshop ‘Relating to Reflexives’, Reykjavík, 25 April 2009.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique. 1989. Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 555–588.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2011. Verbal mood. In von Heusinger, Klaus, Maienborn, Claudia & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1262–1291. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2006. Subjunctives. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 4, 660–684. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restle, David. 2006. Kontrollnomina. Eine Untersuchung zum Verhalten attributiver Infinitivkonstruktionen im Deutschen. Habilitationsschrift, LMU München.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2006. Icelandic logophoric anaphora. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 2, 544–557. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric & Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigriður. 1997. Long distance ‘bindingʼ in Icelandic: Syntax or discourse? In Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre & Rooryck, Johan (eds.), Atomism and Binding, 323–340. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 1999. Propositional Attitudes and Indexicality: A Cross-categorial Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2004. Context of thought and context of utterance: A note on free indirect discourse and the historical present. Mind & Language 19, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. The lazy Frenchmanʼs approach to the subjunctive: Speculations on reference to worlds and semantics defaults in the analysis of mood. In Geerts, Twan, Ginneken, Ivo van & Jacobs, Haike (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003, 269–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór. 2004. The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Rivista di Linguistica 16, 219–251.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór. 2011. Mood in Icelandic. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.), Mood in the Languages of Europe, 33–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Strahan, Tania. 2011. Antecedent-based approach to binding in Icelandic and Faroese. Nordlyd 37, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 2004. Binding by verbs: Tense, person, and mood under attitudes. In Lohnstein, Horst & Trissler, Susanne (eds.), The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, 431–488. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew. 2002. Locality and control with infinitives of result. Natural Language Semantics 10, 167–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar